阿道夫法西斯主義的理論基礎 

      我的元首愚弄腦殘群體的聖經 —— 群體心理學 

"The bible of mass manipulation", It was Hitler' manual for manipulation. 

He certainly proved that it works, even in the most diabolical way. It should 

be a warning to us all. Unfortunately its going on today in the mass media, 

except now it is totally scientific when the subconscious mind of the 

population is targeted. Must read to understand the principles of mass 

manipulation.

谷歌同志一秒鐘完工譯文：

“操控群體的聖經”，這是希特勒的操控手冊。 他當然證明了它是

有效的，即使是最令人作嘔的方式。 這應該是對我們所有人的警告。 

不幸的是，它今天在大眾媒體上正在發生，除了現在，當以人群的

潛意識為目標時，這是完全科學的。 必讀書以了解如何操縱群體的

基本原理。

Hitler’s Guide to Propaganda – 

The Psychology of Coercion

希特勒式宣傳指南 —— 高壓強制心理學

by Sajid Surve, DO | November 4, 2008

Psychiatry and Psychology CategoryAdolf Hitler was a monster. The revolution he spawned changed the world landscape forever. But have you ever wondered how he did it? How did Hitler convince 70 million rational people to engage in horrible atrocities and wage war against the world? Although his agenda was decidedly negative, Hitler was a master of the science of coercion. Through the use of his speeches and propaganda, he was able to bend the will of ordinary people into submission and create an obedient army ready to carry out his orders, no matter how absurd they might be. Hitler’s formula for coercion of a group of people was very simple. He discussed it at length in his book Mein Kampf:

1. Keep the dogma simple. Make only 1 or 2 points.

2. Be forthright and powerfully direct. Speak only in the telling or ordering mode.

Hitler3. As much as possible, reduce concepts down into stereotypes which are black and white.

4. Speak to people’s emotions and stir them constantly.

5. Use lots of repetition; repeat your points over and over again.

6. Forget literary beauty, scientific reasoning, balance, or novelty.

7. Focus solely on convincing people and creating zealots.

8. Find slogans which can be used to drive the movement forward.

Most of Hitler’s inspiration came from a social psychologist by the name of Gustave Le Bon, who published several works and was considered an authority on the psychology of crowds. Le Bon posited that once individuals came together to form a group, the individual’s will was surrendered to what was perceived to be the will of the group. Their faculties of reasoning were impaired or destroyed, and they entered into a more suggestible state. The larger the group, the easier it was to coerce.

Aside from the general pointers above regarding how to engage in coercion, Hitler also had a very specific structure which he used for all of his speeches in order to capitalize on the susceptibility of the crowd. The first thing he would do is point out the commonality of the people gathered in the crowd so that he could instantly unify the group. The next step would be to identify a threat to that commonality to put the group on edge, and stir up the emotions of fear and anger. The third and most important step was to invoke a higher power, and appoint himself as an agent of that higher power. If the crowd was able to believe this, then the last two steps were easy: give the higher power’s “solution” to that threat to the commonality, and proclaim that carrying out the solution would be a victory for both the commonality and the higher power.

This speech structure was obviously successful to disastrous consequences. Since Hitler’s time, others have utilized the same structure to accomplish coercion for different ends. One of the most notable examples would be Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. His I Have a Dream speech follows this pattern almost perfectly, but to serve a very different purpose. So where can we benefit from this knowledge?

The first application is to identify when others are attempting to engage in coercion. A political campaign is essentially a huge, protracted exercise in coercion, as is advertising and marketing. Being aware of the tools utilized can be helpful to rise above the influence and encourage others to do the same.

Secondly, as in the case of Dr. King, sometimes coercion can serve a positive purpose. Wielding these tools can help to improve abilities in public speaking and persuasive argument. Simple ideas like unifying a group before proceeding are excellent ways to communicate more effectively.

In short, Adolf Hitler was a monstrous figure. By deconstructing his tools we can learn not to fall prey to them again, and apply the useful aspects of his craft towards the greater good.

希特勒式宣傳指南 —— 高壓強制心理學

薩吉德·瑟夫（Sajid Surve）| 2008年11月4日

精神病學和心理學類別阿道夫·希特勒是一個怪物。他引發的革命徹底改變了世界格局。但是您是否想知道他是如何做到的？希特勒如何說服7千萬理性人從事可怕的暴行並與世界進行戰爭？儘管他的議程絕對是負面的，但希特勒還是脅迫科學的大師。通過演講和宣傳，他使平民百姓的意志屈服了，並創建了一支服從軍隊，隨時準備執行他的命令，無論他們多麼荒謬。希特勒強迫一群人的公式很簡單。他在他的著作《我的奮鬥》中詳細討論了這一點：

1.保持訓誡簡單。只講1或2個要點。

2.坦率而有力的指導。僅在告知或訂購模式下講。

3.儘可能將概念簡化為黑白的刻板印象。

4.談論人們的情緒並不斷激發他們。

5.使用大量重複；一遍又一遍地重複您的觀點。

6.忘記文學之美，科學推理，平衡性或新穎性。

7.只專注於說服人民和創造狂熱分子。

8.找到可以用來推動運動前進的口號。

希特勒的大部分靈感來自一位名叫古斯塔夫·勒龐（Gustave Le Bon）的社會心理學家，他出版了多部作品，並被認為是人群心理學的權威。勒·邦（Le Bon）認為，一旦個人聚在一起組成一個團體，個人的意志就會被屈服於被認為是該團體的意志。他們的推理能力受到削弱或破壞，他們進入了一個更容易讓人聯想到的狀態。小組越大，越容易脅迫。

除了上面關於如何進行脅迫的一般性指示外，希特勒還具有非常具體的結構，他在所有演講中都使用了這種結構，以便利用人群的敏感性。他要做的第一件事是指出聚集在人群中的人們的共性，以便他可以立即統一團隊。下一步將是確定對該共性的威脅，以使該組織處於優勢地位，並激起恐懼和憤怒的情緒。第三也是最重要的一步是調用更高的權力，並任命自己為更高權力的代理人。如果群眾能夠相信這一點，那麼最後兩個步驟就很容易了：將更高的權力的“解決方案”提供給對共同性的威脅，並宣布實施解決方案將是共同性和更高權力的勝利。 。

這種言語結構顯然成功地帶來了災難性的後果。自希特勒（Hitler）時代以來，其他人已經利用相同的結構來實現針對不同目標的強制。最著名的例子之一是小馬丁·路德·金博士（Dr. Martin Luther King，Jr.）的“我有一個夢想”演講，幾乎完全遵循了這種模式，但目的卻截然不同。那麼我們可以從中受益嗎？

第一個應用程序是識別其他人何時試圖進行脅迫。政治運動從本質上講是一種巨大的，持久的脅迫活動，廣告和市場營銷也是如此。意識到所使用的工具可能有助於超越影響力並鼓勵其他人也這樣做。

其次，就像金博士一樣，有時脅迫可以起到積極的作用。運用這些工具可以幫助提高公眾演講和說服力的能力。簡單的想法，例如在繼續進行之前統一一個小組，是進行更有效溝通的絕佳方法。

簡而言之，希特勒是一個了不起的人物。通過解構他的工具，我們可以學會不要再淪為他們的獵物，而將他的手藝的有用方面應用到更大的利益上。

George Lachmann Mosse claimed that fascist theories of leadership that emerged during the 1920s owed much to Le Bon's theories of crowd psychology. Adolf Hitler is known to have read The Crowd and in Mein Kampf drew on the propaganda techniques proposed by Le Bon.[46][47] Benito Mussolini also made a careful study of Le Bon.[48] Le Bon also influenced Vladimir Lenin and the Bolsheviks.[49]

喬治·拉赫曼·摩斯（George Lachmann Mosse）聲稱，1920年代出現的法西斯主義領導理論很大程度上歸功于勒邦（Le Bon）的人群心理學理論。 眾所周知，阿道夫·希特勒（Adolf Hitler）閱讀過《人群》，在《我的奮鬥》中借鑑了勒邦（Le Bon）提出的宣傳技巧。[46] [47] 貝尼托·墨索里尼（Benito Mussolini）也對勒邦（Le Bon）進行了仔細研究。[48] 勒龐也影響了弗拉基米爾·列寧和布爾什維克。[49]

http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/445/pg445-images.html

https://fobore.com/book/1564

  ****************************

退役海軍少將局座張召忠同志：

有人說了這麼一句話，我感覺很對的，

他說美國海軍是一支力量，

除去美國之外的世界一百多個國家海軍全加起來，

都拉到海上跟美國打，也打不過美國。

我仔細想了一下，也差不多是這樣一個情況。

     視頻鏈接：

http://dy.163.com/v2/article/detail/EP7S29OL0517JOIK.html

   ****************************

睡虎地出土的秦簡規定，老百姓家養的牛瘦了幾斤，就要受刑。

商鞅為何視人不如畜生，讓人民沒有一絲尊嚴呢？《商君書》

如是回答：

《弱民》說：“民，辱則貴爵，

弱則尊官，貧則重賞。以刑治民，則樂用；以賞戰民，則輕死。

故戰事兵用曰強。民有私榮，則賤列卑官；富則輕賞。治民

羞辱以刑，戰則戰。民畏死、事亂而戰，故兵農怠而國弱。”

至此，“同盟者”終於成為了“奴才”的一份子，整個帝國，

唯王獨尊。

而“愚民，弱民，疲民，辱民，貧民”只是完成上述步驟的

手段，而且是必須手段，畢竟要完成“反人性”的目標，這些

技術性的“利用人性弱點”的手腕兒，就屬於必備的條件。

但是，當“民”完整地享受和適應了以上的“五術”之後，

連“人性”都將不再完整，也就徹底的工具化、物化，所以，

有後人評價商鞅是“以手摶沙”，非常精當，“合格的秦民”

就是一粒粒沙子，而秦王就是那隻攥住沙子的手。

當沙子太多，手掌攥不住時，或者握得太緊、太松，想要換個

省力的姿勢時，沙子堆成的城堡、帝國，都會自己碎裂，散落

一地，這也恰是秦制帝國輪替的宿命所在。