设万维读者为首页 广告服务 技术服务 联系我们 关于万维
简体 繁体 手机版
分类广告
版主:红树林
万维读者网 > 五 味 斋 > 帖子
重要的进展:劳工领袖支持新美加墨协定,民主党和总统接近握手
送交者: FVCK 2019年12月09日15:22:28 于 [五 味 斋] 发送悄悄话

https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/12/09/afl-cio-chief-got-deal-usmca/


Can Donald Trump score a major win on trade and international relations even as House Democrats prepare to impeach him on his handling of the latter? The president of the nation’s largest labor coalition says yes. The White House has crafted a deal on the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement which satisfies both unions and Democrats, and now should pass quickly in the House:


SEE ALSO: Moderate House Dem: I’m struggling to see how the evidence here justifies impeachment


A key party to the talks, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka, said Monday morning that there was a deal and he planned to meet with his executive committee Monday afternoon to discuss it.

“We have pushed them hard and have done quite well,” Trumka said in an email to the Washington Post.

Support from the AFL-CIO, which opposes the existing North American Free Trade Agreement and blames it for destroying millions of good-paying manufacturing jobs, would likely ensure support from a majority of House Democrats if the deal is brought up for a vote.

Perhaps realizing the issue will play to Trump’s benefit, the union’s negotiator tried to wrest credit for deal away from the president. Their demands produced a trade deal with “significant differences,” the attorney claims:


“The USMCA they signed in 2018 is not going to be the same as the USMCA we see in 2019,” said Dan Ujczo, a trade lawer with Dickinson Wright. “There are going to be significant differences.”

Differences, to be sure, but how significant are they likely to be? According to the Washington Post, the changes focus mainly on steel, iron, and pharmaceuticals, which are important trade areas but hardly the bulk of transactions in North America. Besides, the deal will still need passage in Mexico and Canada after the US codifies the trade deal into statutory law. They wouldn’t go along with a massive overhaul of the agreement that they made earlier with Trump, not unless the Democrats went all the way back to NAFTA.

And let’s not forget too that the ongoing negotiations with Mexico and Canada were conducted by the White House, not the AFL-CIO. As the terms have changed in talks with the House Democrats and Labor, trade representative Robert Lighthizer has held continuous meetings with his counterparts in both countries to simultaneously work out the differences between the original USMCA and the demands being made in the House.

Politically, this would be a huge win for Trump, who almost alone campaigned against the preceding NAFTA during the 2016 campaign. He called it the worst trade deal in history, promising to end it and replace it with a deal that treated American workers with more respect. Despite considerable skepticism that Trump could get Canada and Mexico back to the bargaining table, he managed to succeed in the end with short-term trade wars that both Republicans and Democrats initially opposed. Trump has been waiting more than a year for the House to act on the deal, and until recently it appeared that Nancy Pelosi was content to run out the clock on the agreement rather than give Trump a win.

Now, however, voters are asking why Democrats aren’t getting anything done except impeachment, especially in the key swing states that gave Trump his victory in 2016. Pelosi might need this more than Trump does at this point, especially now that she has fully committed to getting articles of impeachment to the House floor by Christmas. If that’s all she has to show for 2019, Pelosi is going to lose some of her freshmen in the next election and Democrats might not win back Michigan, Pennsylvania, or Wisconsin in 2020 either.


0%(0)
0%(0)
  川总英武!  /无内容 - 衣冠禽兽 12/09/19 (1)
    劳工领袖企图淡化总统的功劳 - FVCK 12/09/19 (2)
标 题 (必选项):
内 容 (选填项):
实用资讯
北美最全的折扣机票网站
贝佳药业美国专利【骨精华】消关节痛、骨刺、五十肩【心血通】改善心绞痛

一周点击热帖 更多>>
一周回复热帖
历史上的今天:回复热帖
2018: zt这不是战狼,也不是阴谋论--也谈这个
2018: 你拿费里曼的自由市场经济理论来作衡量
2017: 关于言论自由和网站运行的几个提问
2017: 曾经有人把自己母亲的照片放上来,我建
2016: “公共食堂”制度是如何加剧饥荒的?zt
2016: 朴大妈的事情是这样的
2015: 窗铺说得没错。恐怖粉子家属即便没参与
2015: 素质(身份)不同的体现:对对眼们是研
2014: 昨天一个学生问问题,说不会求导数,有
2014: 刚才有个中国学生来找我。她以前上过我