设万维读者为首页 广告服务 技术服务 联系我们 关于万维
简体 繁体 手机版
分类广告
版主:奇异恩典
万维读者网 > 彩虹之约 > 跟帖 感谢万维网友为5.12四川地震受难同胞奉献的爱  
Clarification
送交者: mean 2018月07月29日16:15:09 于 [彩虹之约] 发送悄悄话
回  答: I think RCC and EPC mean 于 2018-07-29 15:39:32

almost all textual criticism scholars, liberal or conservative, believes Mark 16:9-20 isn't part of the original manuscript. This matters to Protestant version of inerrancy because this concept extends to "original manuscript" mostly. If it likely did not appear in the "original manuscript", its authority may be called into question.

RCC and EOC defines canoniicity of the Bible differently. The authority of the church and tradition is the determining factor of the authority of the Bible. So whether Mark 16:9-20 was part of the original manuscript or not, does not really matter. All that matters is that it's been used in the church as being authoritative. 

0%(0)
0%(0)
  这是非常deceptive的一段话: - 新歌 07/29/18 (14)
    \"original manuscript\" - mean 07/29/18 (1)
标  题 (必选项):
内  容 (选填项):
实用资讯
万维读者网十周年有奖征文评选结果
一周点击热帖 更多>>
一周回复热帖
历史上的今天:回复热帖
2016: 启示录 15
2016: Christian Today关于GRACE对于远调查的
2015: news:We fight back!!
2015: 神的义:用神的方法(赎)来达到神的标
2014: xiangpu: “以信为本”
2014: 重生与信心:一个硬币的两面
2013: 呵呵,看来很多人连基础神学的功课都没
2013: 要是/如/像神,还是要是/如/像基督,你