写下这个题目立刻发现这个结论很靠谱。因为米是男人，写这个埋汰男人，可见男人真的是白痴。不过，这话即使是女人说，你也扣不上性别歧视的嫌疑的帽子。因为“男人白痴”是一个正经八百的科学命题，称为“男人白痴理论”，简称MIT（Male Idiot Theory）。

MIT不只是一个理论，而且被证实是正确的。最近在《英国医学杂志》（British Medical Journal）上发表的研究结果发现有充分证据说明男人确实是愚蠢的。《英国医学杂志》可不是娱乐圈的八卦杂志，而是权威的医学文献，看样子男人这次算是栽了。

这项研究的主要根据是达尔文奖（Darwin Awards）。这是以提出进化论的达尔文的名字命名，每年评出死的最愚蠢的人，候选人都是以愚蠢的方法丧命，将自己移出人类基因库。

比如，一个恐怖分子制作炸弹包裹寄给有关人士，可是因为邮资不够被退回，这笨蛋看着包裹面熟，想都不想直接拆开，结果被自己的炸弹炸死。不过，他也不算太蠢，起码炸弹制作还是成功的。

有一个工人要拆除停车场中的支柱。周围办公室的员工闲着没事，打赌猜测他拆除最后一根柱子的方案。结果谁都没猜对，因为他根本没有方案，直接去拆最后那根柱子，理所当然地被水泥板压死。值得欣慰地是，他完成了工作。

还有，有个贼偷自动升降梯的钢缆。他站在电梯中割断钢缆，然后随着电梯坠落，如他所愿，死的时候手里抓着钢缆。有一人把购物手推车偷挂在火车尾部，想“搭顺风车”回家。被火车拖了两英里,还没到家就直接上西天了。有个人为了向朋友证明一支具有手枪功能的“间谍笔”是真的，就向自己头上开了一枪，结果确实是真的。

很不幸这几个佼佼者都是男人。

研究者通过对达尔文奖的分析发现：90%的奖项都由男性“获得”。

在332项提名中，有14项是男女共享，它们大多是爱冒险的丈夫和爱丈夫的妻子共同陷于危险境地的状况。其余318个有效奖项中282项（88.7%）授给男性，只有36项授给女性。此性别差异完全符合MIT(男人白痴理论): 男人是傻瓜，傻瓜做傻事(men are idiots and idiots do stupid things)。

University of Newcastle的Dennis Lendrem博士说：愚蠢的冒险被定义为无意义的冒险，这些冒险的收获极小甚至没有，结局基本是无法挽回的悲剧。男人愿意冒这种毫无必要的险去追求社会尊严，或者仅仅以此换取“吹嘘的权利”。

回头看万维博主，女人比男人多。男人=白痴，女人>男人，这说明写博客的人白痴比较少。

结论：写博客的男人是白痴中的聪明人，还好，还好！

Study supports the theory that men are idiots

Sex differences in risk seeking behaviour, emergency hospital admissions, and mortality are well documented. Males are more likely to be admitted to an emergency department after accidental injuries, more likely to be admitted with a sporting injury, and more likely to be involved in a fatal road traffic collision.

Related Articles

However, little is known about sex differences in idiotic risk-taking behaviour. So researchers in north east England decided to test "male idiot theory" (MIT) that many of the differences in risk seeking behaviour may be explained by the observation that men are idiots and idiots do stupid things.

They reviewed data on idiotic behaviours demonstrated by winners of the Darwin Award over a 20 year period (1995 to 2014), noting the sex of the winner. To qualify, nominees must improve the gene pool by eliminating themselves from the human race using astonishingly stupid methods.

Worthy candidates include a man stealing a ride home by hitching a shopping trolley to the back of a train, only to be dragged two miles to his death before the train was able to stop; and the terrorist who posted a letter bomb with insufficient postage stamps and who, on its return, unthinkingly opened his own letter.

Of the 413 Darwin Award nominations, 332 were independently verified and confirmed by the Darwin Awards Committee. Of these, 14 were shared by male and female nominees -- usually overly adventurous couples in compromising positions -- leaving 318 valid cases for statistical testing.

Of these 318 cases, 282 Darwin Awards were awarded to males, and just 36 awards given to females. Males thus made up 88.7% of Darwin Award winners, and this sex difference is highly statistically significant, say the authors.

This finding is entirely consistent with male idiot theory (MIT) and supports the hypothesis that men are idiots and idiots do stupid things.

Journal Reference:

1.     B. A. D. Lendrem, D. W. Lendrem, A. Gray, J. D. Isaacs. The Darwin Awards: sex differences in idiotic behaviour. BMJ, 2014; 349 (dec10 20): g7094 DOI:10.1136/bmj.g7094