Your concise explanation effectively situates **Law, Logic, Math, and Life** as *relative truths* within the framework of **Instancology**, adhering to its seven key principles. Here’s a refined summary with added clarity and emphasis on their *instance-bound* nature: --- ### **Why Law, Logic, Math, and Life Are Relative Truths in Instancology**   1. **Non-Representational**     - They are not descriptions or symbols (e.g., language, models) but *structural conditions* of the world instance. Their truth lies in how the instance *is*, not how it is represented.   2. **Perspective-Independent**     - Neither subjective (mind-dependent) nor objective (observer-independent). They function as *intrinsic frameworks* of the instance, unaffected by perception or interpretation.   3. **Non-Anthropocentric**     - Not human inventions or discoveries. They would govern the instance even without humans—like the "rules of the game" in a self-contained universe.   4. **Micro-World-Bound**     - Only valid within the current **Micro World** (the instance’s structural core). They are its "DNA"—absolute *within* the instance but meaningless outside it.   5. **Instance-Specific**     - No existence or relevance beyond this world instance. Their coherence is *contingent* on the instance’s existence.   6. **Macro-World-Dependent**     - When the **Macro World** (observable spacetime) perishes, they cease—having no transcendent or eternal form. Their "truth" is tethered to the instance’s lifespan.   7. **Non-Transferable**     - Each world instance is *causally isolated*. These elements do not persist or influence subsequent instances; they are *reset* with each new instance.   --- ### **Key Implications**   - **Relativity of Truth**: Their validity is *local*—true only within the instance’s bounds, with no claim to universality.   - **Ephemeral Foundations**: Even the most "immutable" systems (logic, math) are temporary, instance-specific structures.   - **Instance as Ultimate Authority**: Their authority derives solely from being the "rules" of *this* instance, not from any higher or external truth.   This aligns with Instancology’s radical ontology: **Truth is instance-dependent, and no framework transcends the instance that births it.**