設萬維讀者為首頁 廣告服務 技術服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
簡體 繁體 手機版
分類廣告
版主:奇異恩典
萬維讀者網 > 彩虹之約 > 帖子
Dispensationalism and Covenent
送交者: oldfish 2013年09月27日20:06:59 於 [彩虹之約] 發送悄悄話

Dispensationalism and Covenent Theology

时代论與 约神学

 

尼提寧 译

 

I.                    Introduction:   介言

 

In analyzing the theological systems that predominate today, it is important that we remain as objective as possible. We do not want to misrepresent what others believe. We do not want to engage in ballistic brick-throwing and unloving polemics against Christian peoples who hold differing theological opinions.

在分析主宰今日神学系统中的神学时,我们的客观性是非常重要的。我们不希望错误的诠释别的神学信仰,我们不想要與那些持守不同神学观念的基督徒进行不必要的拍砖之传之举和令人厌恶的论战。

 

Never do we want to "write someone off" and deny that they are our Christian brother or sister because they organize their "belief-system" differently that we do, provided they profess that Jesus is the Christ and have received Him by faith. Christian unity is not uniformity of thought or ideology. We seek a unity of love despite diversity of opinion, understanding, interpretation or theological explanation. Our unity is in Christ, not in theological constructions.

我们也从未想要仅仅因为與我们不同的“信仰系统(belief-system)”,而“一笔勾销”某人是我们的基督徒弟兄或姐妹,更遑论他们也承认耶稣是基督,並在信中领受了 。基督徒的合一不是思想,或意识,或释经,或神学诠释上的统一。我们的合一乃是在基督耶稣裡面,而不是在神学的架腹裡面。

 

Covenant theology and Dispensational theology often view themselves as opponents at opposite extremes of the theological spectrum, shooting arrows across a great theological chasm. There is indeed a great diversity of opinion, as we have tried to delineate, but from another perspective they are both camped in the same ditch.

 约神学與时代论神学往往视彼此为神学光谱之两个对立的極端,在一个庞大的神学峡谷两旁彼此口诛笔伐。然而,在观念上的巨大差異以为,就如同我们已经勾勒的图画一样,从另一个角度而言,他们乃是驻扎在同一个壕沟中的战友。

 

Dispensational theology begins its application of presuppositions in Genesis 12-17 with the expectation of a literal and physical fulfillment of an unconditional covenant with Abraham. Covenant theology also focuses the application of its presuppositions on the "everlasting covenant" of God with Abraham in Genesis 17. Isn't it interesting that both theologies seem to commence with epistemological premises about the fulfillment of promises to Abraham? Should not our theology commence with divine activity prior to Abraham?

时代论的神学乃是基於对於创世纪12-17章的假设,以字面與物质的意义期盼神與亚伯拉罕立的约能够无条件的应验。 约神学也着重於创世纪17章中,神與亚伯拉罕立定的“永约”的应用。这两个神学系统都着手於从知识论的前提上,处理亚伯拉罕之约的应验,这样的事实是否显得非常有意思呢?难道我们的神学不该着手於神在亚伯拉罕之前的行动?


(待续)

0%(0)
0%(0)
標 題 (必選項):
內 容 (選填項):
實用資訊
回國機票$360起 | 商務艙省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出爐:海航獲五星
海外華人福利!在線看陳建斌《三叉戟》熱血歸回 豪情築夢 高清免費看 無地區限制
一周點擊熱帖 更多>>
一周回復熱帖
歷史上的今天:回復熱帖
2012: mean: Zt :Sanctus Real - Lead Me
2012: 四季樹:行至洛杉磯,寫帖留念
2011: 搖頭弟兄,對這則新聞有什麼勸勉的嗎?
2011: 我從尼亞加拉大瀑布給大家致以問候!
2010: 主日證道:有個地方叫陰間(路16:19-3
2009: 鹽若失了味,可用什麼叫它再咸
2009: 測試
2008: 【每周背經】下周經文:要常常喜樂.
2008: ZT給士每拿教會的信