設萬維讀者為首頁 廣告服務 技術服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
簡體 繁體 手機版
分類廣告
版主:阿飛的劍
萬維讀者網 > 茗香茶語 > 帖子
賀梅案一錘定音的論斷
送交者: YDX 2011年09月12日10:48:29 於 [茗香茶語] 發送悄悄話
http://www.parentalrightsandjustice.com/upload/site/1/79/jackhe_motion_for_determination.pdf

[In summary, we made attempts to visit our daughter; we did not go to Bakers’ home
because they did not want us back any more and the police ordered us not to go back;
we did not know there was a 4 month limit set in the Tennessee statute; and we had
nowhere to visit our daughter. There was no willfulness in our failure to visit between January 28, 2001 and June 20, 2001.... Since we did not willfully abandon our daughter, we request the Supreme Court to reinstate our parental rights.]

[Once the facts establish the material change in our circumstances and our fitness
as parents, the “superior parental rights doctrine” should apply. As this Court has
ruled before:

In a contest between a parent and a non-parent, a parent cannot be
deprived of the custody of a child unless there has been a finding, after
notice required by due process, of substantial harm to the child. Only
then may a court engage in a general “best interest of the child”
evaluation in making a determination of custody.
In re Adoption of Female Child, 896 S.W.2d 546, 548 (Tenn. 1995).

In our case, the temporary nature of the custody arrangement hinged on the
temporary nature of the hardship we experienced in 1999. Since the condition and
reason for the 1999 temporary custody arrangement no longer exists and the change
of circumstances is clear, we, the biological parents of our daughter, ask the Supreme
Court to grant our April 9, 2001 petition to modify custody as a matter of law.]


0%(0)
0%(0)
標 題 (必選項):
內 容 (選填項):
實用資訊
回國機票$360起 | 商務艙省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出爐:海航獲五星
海外華人福利!在線看陳建斌《三叉戟》熱血歸回 豪情築夢 高清免費看 無地區限制
一周點擊熱帖 更多>>
一周回復熱帖
歷史上的今天:回復熱帖
2010: 日本這次贏定了。呵呵
2010: 狗視眈眈
2009: 瓦斯彈:話說油條
2009: 世界最新宜居城市榜出爐:溫哥華排名第
2008: 08碼居然對採訪他的記者說他的穆斯林信
2008: PERSEPOLIS===我在伊朗長大
2006: 王瑞芸:三家村 (ZT)
2006: 小胖子威爾一家