设万维读者为首页 广告服务 技术服务 联系我们 关于万维
简体 繁体 手机版
分类广告
版主:诤友
万维读者网 > 教育学术 > 跟帖
重写
送交者: littelfat 2009月04月22日07:10:37 于 [教育学术] 发送悄悄话
回  答: 楼下给定理君的回贴供你和并瓦参考。littelfat 于 2009-04-22 07:06:52
What is is at debate is not whether the Chinese language is capable of symbolic or formal derivations. To that end, any language systems can potentially introduce a set of symbols, if needs be. And the symbols can simply be the characters from the very same language. As a matter of fact, I believe that, by now, under the heavy influence of western cultures, all major forms of human languages have been made to connect with symbolic reasoning using symbolic tools as part of their "own" languages.

But so what ?

The fact is: the very form and format of the Chinese language is not conducive to generating the symbolic language spontaneously and automatically on its own.

I think history has clearly demonstarted that. The very fact that you are using partial
symbolic language only after (not before) you have been educated within the western cultural system (be it math, science or whatever) only serves to attest the truth of that statement.
0%(0)
0%(0)
标  题 (必选项):
内  容 (选填项):
实用资讯
回国机票$360起 | 商务舱省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出炉:海航获五星
海外华人福利!在线看陈建斌《三叉戟》热血归回 豪情筑梦 高清免费看 无地区限制
一周点击热帖 更多>>
一周回复热帖
历史上的今天:回复热帖
2005: 韩露: 苏格兰小镇寻书记
2005: 郭影: 留学西班牙还是韩国?
2004: 清华理科现状
2004: 中国科学界的急功近利