设万维读者为首页 广告服务 技术服务 联系我们 关于万维
简体 繁体 手机版
分类广告
版主:纳川
万维读者网 > 天下论坛 > 帖子
民主党徒们,你们输了。你们如果想赢回来,要用一些以前没用过的
送交者: 胡骑来 2017年03月20日13:41:47 于 [天下论坛] 发送悄悄话
民主党徒们,你们输了。你们如果想赢回来,要用一些以前没用过的手法,就是

民主党徒们,请提前为2020年做准备,广为宣传。

Abraham-Ada's Method /*********************************************************/ Hi, folks. Do you know how to vote when you DON'T like either candidates, Richard and Thomas? Yes, you are right. Pick Richard when you don't like either because 'R' < 'T'. If we don't go to vote, they will believe that we are vanished. If we pick one randomly, they will believe that we will cancel each other and our opinion is mere a noise. We, the people who don't like either candidates, should agree the voting strategy that all of us will pick the bad bird according to the given name in alphabetical order from A to Z. The idea is to tell them "Give us at least one candidate we like or whose name is Abraham". If the USA still have 10 votes remain and we insist this voting strategy, I guarantee that we will have a president we like before the USA die out. I don't know if my English skill is good enough to explain this great idea clearly. But I believe you can understand it because you are electrical engineers. If you think this great idea will help the USA, please share it with your family, your friends, your enemies and anyone you know. Have fun. /*********************************************************/ /*the Abraham-Ada's Method expressed in C style pseudocode*/ /*01*/ /* code_001*/ /*02*/ char* vote((char*) candidate[]) /*03*/ { /*04*/ if (there_is_a_candidate_i_like == TRUE) /*05*/ return candidate[i_like]; /*06*/ else /*07*/ { /*08*/ sort_by_name(candidate); /*09*/ return candidate[0]; /*10*/ } /*11*/ } /*********************************************************/ /* The code_001 still has a problem. If they set up a dummy or so call 'third party' whose name is Abraham to absorb our arrows and to defend the Richard and Thomas, our votes will have no effect because according to code_001 we will pick this dummy. And we are still vanished just as we do not go to vote. Hence I give the code_002 as a revise. I think if they want to sale Richard and Thomas to us, Richard and Thomas will become the two most well-known candidates. */ /*01*/ /* code_002 */ /*02*/ char* vote((char*) candidate[]) /*03*/ { /*04*/ (char*) most_well_known_candidate[2]; /*05*/ /*06*/ if (there_is_a_candidate_i_like == TRUE) /*07*/ return candidate[i_like]; /*08*/ else /*09*/ { /*10*/ most_well_known_candidate[0] = /*11*/ the_1st_most_well_known(candidate); /*12*/ most_well_known_candidate[1] = /*13*/ the_2nd_most_well_known(candidate); /*14*/ /*15*/ sort_by_name(most_well_known_candidate); /*16*/ return most_well_known_candidate[0]; /*17*/ } /*18*/ } /*********************************************************/ Example: Suppose there are 10,000 voters. 60% or 6000 do not like Richard or Thomas. And in the remaining 40% or 4000, 55% like Thomas, 45% like Richard. (1) If this 6000 does not go to vote, then Thomas gets 4000*55%=2200, Richard gets 4000*45%=1800, Thomas wins. (2) If 15% of this 6000, that is 900, goes to vote. But they pick one randomly. Usually according to the normal distribution law, Richard or Thomas will get approximately same points. Let's assume Richard gets 467 and Thomas gets 433. Then Richard, 1800+467=2267, Thomas, 2200+433=2633. Thomas wins. Even 6000 is a large number, but they will not affect the result because they cancel each other. They do not matter. (3) If 15% of this 6000, that is 900, goes to vote. They all pick Richard according to code_002 when they do not like either. Then Richard gets 1800+900=2700, and Thomas still gets 2200, Richard wins and Thomas loses. After the boss of the election game in the background knows the code_002, next time he/she will give you a bird you like or a bird whose name is Abraham and no one want to be the second bird whose losing can be predicted. And this election game can not fool people again. We just push the boat according to the flow. That is the point. YES, WE HAVE BEEN FOOLED FOR MORE THAN 200 YEARS. /*********************************************************/ /*********************************************************/


0%(0)
0%(0)
  normal distribution 中文怎么说?   /无内容 - 明君小雪 03/20/17 (2)
    正态分布  /无内容 - pifu01 03/20/17 (0)
    你这个“亚伯拉罕·艾达方法“确实有利于解决投票问题  /无内容 - 明君小雪 03/20/17 (9)
      尤其针对美式民主的投票问题。  /无内容 - 明君小雪 03/20/17 (4)
        最好就是编进法律。公民不得弃权投票。  /无内容 - 明君小雪 03/20/17 (4)
      按照生日投票也行。谁年轻投给谁。  /无内容 - 明君小雪 03/20/17 (5)
        但是不能解决苏格拉底之死的问题 - 英国脱欧问题  /无内容 - 明君小雪 03/20/17 (4)
          任何地区的独立公投的问题 也属于苏格拉底之死问题  /无内容 - 明君小雪 03/20/17 (7)
    纸上谈兵越说越玄  /无内容 - 明君小雪 03/20/17 (8)
      不这样说,民运们没积极性啊  /无内容 - 胡骑来 03/20/17 (14)
        用中国鸟位给民运提精神,呵呵  /无内容 - 明君小雪 03/20/17 (8)
          不给他们此看得到吃不到的胡萝卜,他们不跟着来。  /无内容 - 胡骑来 03/20/17 (5)
标 题 (必选项):
内 容 (选填项):
实用资讯
发龙药业大回馈!美国专利骨胶原、活心素、灯盏素、排毒养颜宝购买两疗程免费邮寄中国
想进就进,想出就出,全球汇市不分昼夜!
天天养生,保健礼品,物超所值,疯狂现金折扣,直销美加,港台,大陆,东南亚
西洋参、羊胎盘、鱼油卵磷脂200多种送礼自用健康佳品,全部特价!由此进入
留美学生医疗保险$39/月,短期访美旅游保险,不需体检无年龄限制
一周点击热帖 更多>>
一周回复热帖
历史上的今天:回复热帖
2016: 以色列议会各政党就反邪教立法达成一致
2016: 从章怡和写作看毛泽东反右的先见之明
2015: 余不洁:论柴玲指控远志明强奸事件
2015: 民主在美国困难时期的作用
2014: 普京最后会输得连内裤都不剩
2014: 胡耀邦缺什么?缺人格!缺德!缺信仰!
2013: 不洁之人:毛泽东的神秘举动
2013: 专制制度的打黑和反腐败本质上更黑和更
2012: 温总理记者会意义:公开与最大的保守派
2012: 胡锦涛误判 叶利卿阴云姓温不姓薄