设万维读者为首页 广告服务 技术服务 联系我们 关于万维
简体 繁体 手机版
分类广告
版主:纳川
万维读者网 > 天下论坛 > 帖子
Naval Power: USA vs PRC
送交者: renqiulan 2024年04月24日16:12:07 于 [天下论坛] 发送悄悄话

Naval power is not solely determined by the quantity of ships, but rather by the effectiveness and reach of their weapon systems.


Roughly ten percent of China's warships have a range surpassing a thousand miles, with few boasting strike capabilities extending beyond a couple of thousand miles (1 mile = 1.6 km).


Meanwhile, American supercarriers boast full blue-water capability, ready to strike targets at significantly longer distances, especially with standoff missiles.


Playing catch-up, China is currently upgrading its intermediate-range missiles, which range from 500 to 5000 kilometers.


In response, U.S. naval forces have a couple of "game-changers" deployable in the Pacific theater.

The first one is a system of land-based intermediate-range missiles strategically positioned in U.S. territories like Midway and Guam, with potential additional locations around Darwin, Australia. Spanning thousands of kilometers, these cruise missiles would effectively counter Chinese naval threats to the shipping routes.

The second one involves equipping submarines with a maritime-targeting version of the Tomahawk cruise missile. Unlike earlier iterations, these Tomahawks can effectively target moving naval vessels, reminiscent of their groundbreaking role in the Gulf War of 1992. Such advancement is a result of leveraging GPS technology for precision strikes.

What about China's Yaogan (遥感) reconnaissance satellites for targeting? Well, lagging behind America's advancements in autonomous adjustment, China's system has to rely on preset paths, rendering its missiles unable to hit moving targets.

The Chinese Navy, untested in real battles, lacks war experience, and its second-rate technologies can hardly improve the situation. Prolonging the current arms race with the U.S. would only accelerate deglobalization and exacerbate China's vulnerability in essential resources such as food and fuel. Don't expect Russia to stand with a loser.



Author: renqiulan


The U.S. Naval Institute (USNI)

FT_4_22_24.jpg

These are the approximate positions of the U.S. Navy's deployed carrier strike groups and amphibious ready groups throughout the world as of April 22, 2024, based on Navy and public data.


0%(0)
0%(0)
标 题 (必选项):
内 容 (选填项):
实用资讯
回国机票$360起 | 商务舱省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出炉:海航获五星
海外华人福利!在线看陈建斌《三叉戟》热血归回 豪情筑梦 高清免费看 无地区限制
一周点击热帖 更多>>
一周回复热帖
历史上的今天:回复热帖
2023: 对中国驻法国大使馆发言人声明的质疑
2023: 美国式纠偏
2022: 选择自杀的基层民众
2022: 浅谈人类的两大思维逻辑
2021: 程晓农| 中美冷战局势下的海上对峙最新
2021: 苹果社评| 全方位抗中共已成美国的长远
2020: 义和团五毛儿之练成
2020: 坚持一国 方能两制
2019: 看周如何默认毛害贺龙想朗说明林彪冤假
2019: “四一二反革命政变”就是蔡元培等浙江