设万维读者为首页 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
简体 繁体 手机版
分类广告
版主:奇异恩典
万维读者网 > 彩虹之约 > 帖子
Evidence for sex harassment
送交者: repentant 2016年09月09日18:41:13 于 [彩虹之约] 发送悄悄话

How Can I Prove I Was the Victim of Sexual Harassment If It's My Word Against My Boss?


December 10th, 2015

Contributor: Sagar Shah, Esq.

As a lawyer, one of the easier cases to argue is one where there is indisputable evidence your client was wronged. This is the smoking gun situation, where the defendant is clearly at fault. In the world of sexual harassment, these smoking gun cases are rare. What is more common is a war of words—different versions of events told by the two sides to a sexual harassment case. As the victim of sexual harassment, this can be intimidating, especially if it is your word against your supervisor’s. Can your word hold up against your supervisor’s or your employer’s? Will your version of events be enough to win a sexual harassment case?

In this post, we’ll talk about the elements of sexual harassment, what types of evidence are used in a sexual harassment case, how conflicting testimony is resolved, and what you can do as a victim of sexual harassment to help support your own case. If you believe you’ve been sexually harassed at work and would like to understand more about your case, please contact Eisenberg & Baum. We have an experienced group of New York sexual harassment attorneys who are ready to help and advocate on your behalf.

What Are the Elements of Sexual Harassment?

As we’ve discussed in prior blog posts, there are generally two types of sexual harassment cases: quid pro quo cases and hostile work environment cases. Quid pro quo sexual harassment cases occur when an employee is offered some employment benefit in return for the employee's participation in some unwanted sexual conduct.


There are generally two types of sexual harassment cases: quid pro quo cases and hostile work environment cases

Hostile work environment claims, on the other hand, don’t involve this kind of “exchange” of sexual conduct for benefits but rather depend on the employee showing that they were subjected to unwanted sexual conduct that was severe enough to create an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment. Unlike quid pro quo claims, hostile work environment claims typically require the employee show a pattern of harassment over time that ultimately interfered with the employee’s job.

What Types of Evidence Are Used in Sexual Harassment Cases?

Whether you have a quid pro quo claim or a hostile work environment claim, there are two general categories of evidence that you can use to support your case and counter the version of events provided by your supervisor or employer.

Direct Evidence of Sexual Harassment

Direct evidence is the most straightforward way of proving a sexual harassment claim. Direct evidence is evidence that goes to directly proving an element of your claim. For example, a statement by your supervisor that he will fire you if you do not consent to a sexual act would be direct evidence of quid pro quo harassment. Likewise, emails containing sexually explicit jokes sent to you by your supervisor could be direct evidence of a hostile work environment. Even if the statements supporting your claim were made verbally, they can be used to support your claim.

Circumstantial Evidence of Sexual Harassment

Sometimes, the harassment is not as blatant as the examples given above. Instead, an element of the harassment must be inferred by the circumstances surrounding the employee and the harasser. This type of evidence is known as circumstantial evidence, and while it can be more difficult to prove a sexual harassment claim or element based on circumstantial evidence, it can still be effective. Take the above example of the supervisor propositioning their employee, but instead assume the supervisor did not make an explicit threat to fire the employee if they did not consent. Nevertheless, the employee refused to participate in the sexual act and a day later, they were fired. The proximity of the firing to the supervisor's proposition could be circumstantial evidence of a link between the proposition and the decision to fire the employee. Another example of circumstantial evidence that could help support the employee's claim is evidence that other employees were treated similarly in the past by the same supervisor. The more circumstantial evidence there is to support the link between the proposition and the firing, the stronger the employee’s case will become.

How Will Different Versions of Events Be Resolved?

Sexual Harassment Testimony

So what happens when your version of events conflicts with your harasser's version? First, you should know that, just because your supervisor tells a different story, that does not mean your testimony won’t be considered by a court. Your testimony, as the alleged victim of sexual harassment, is often a crucial part of your case. The purpose of the courts and administrative bodies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in handling disputes is often to decide between differing versions of events. The more support you can give for your version through other evidence, the more likely you will prevail in the dispute.

What Can I Do To Support My Case?

Support for your case can come through a number of different sources, from statements by witnesses and other victims to emails and other documentation of the harassment. That kind of evidence is not always available, so it is helpful if you find yourself being sexually harassed, to document your experience as you go through it. We suggest keeping detailed, dated notes of conversations and interactions you’ve had with your harasser and management. Your employer will often have a reporting procedure for sexual harassment victims, which we also recommend you follow. This will provide another avenue for documenting your complaint. If there is a dispute between you and your harasser or employer about what actually happened, your documentation can be critical in supporting your case.

Finally, if you believe you have a sexual harassment claim, please contact us. We can discuss the merits of your case and advise you on your next steps. We offer free initial consultations for sexual harassment claims and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win your case.

 http://www.eandblaw.com/employment-discrimination-blog/2015/12/10/how-can-i-prove-i-was-the-victim-of-sexual-harassment-if-its-my-word-against-my-boss/

0%(0)
0%(0)
笔 名 (必选项): 密 码 (必选项): 注册新用户
标 题 (必选项):
内 容 (选填项):
闂佽瀛╃粙鎺楀Φ閻愮數绀婇柨鐕傛嫹
闂佽瀛╃粙鎺椼€冮崨鑸汗闁跨噦鎷�
实用资讯
回国机票$360起 | 商务舱省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出炉:海航获五星
海外华人福利!在线看陈建斌《三叉戟》热血归回 豪情筑梦 高清免费看 无地区限制
一周点击热帖 更多>>
1 赵晓:石破茂——日本首位新教基 万维网友来
2 赵晓:神是昔在、今在、永在的神 万维网友来
3 【里程信仰问答之186】怎样认识 nngzh
4 回家的路上 生命季刊
5 需要我如何诚恳地道歉? xiahong
6 2023年12月30日 林业工人
7 十二凡人第一章:神召凡人(Commo 林业工人
8 “传话救仆”是高端解经,还是低 谨守
9 瞎哄很显然不诚实、懒惰和偷盗( 谨守
10 “信郁金香”与“见神的国” 谨守
一周回复热帖
1 林慈信:有道可傳﹐以經解經 谨守
2 作为巴文克著作的翻译者之一,老 谨守
3 “无限与有限之间深渊限定,是不 nngzh
4 John Macarthur:关于全然败坏T 谨守
5 Weak和永生弟兄是否同意老宣“神 nngzh
6 【里程信仰问答之122】进化论是 nngzh
7 永生之道的迷思:如何信耶稣才 厨房里的冰
8 Beeke:阿米念主义和加尔文主义 谨守
9 Exegesis的成果是纯正教义,比如 追求永生
10 为什么老N能够愚蠢得如此fundame 谨守
历史上的今天:回复热帖
2015: 微一用下流言語侮辱主內姐妹的原始資料
2015: 被Ashley Madison暴露的牧师自杀
2014: “宣道会乱象”:3年5位牧者被逐和弃会
2014: 年年岁岁;历史上的今天:9月9日(部分
2013: zt 宣教士:拣选与弃绝
2013: 再转贴:Essential vs Non-Essential
2012: 神是个灵
2011: 1956年许梅骊的讨倪檄文《我控诉》与《
2011: 问答与回应:被欺辱的牧者及其出走ZT

闂傚倸鍊烽懗鑸电仚缂備胶绮崝娆忕暦閵忋倕鍐€妞ゆ劑鍎卞皬婵$偑鍊栫敮鎺斺偓姘煎墰閳ь剚鑹鹃ˇ浼村Φ閸曨垰绠抽柟瀛樼妇閸嬫捇寮拌箛瀣╂睏闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟� | 婵犲痉鏉库偓妤佹叏閻戣棄纾绘繛鎴欏灪閸婅埖绻濋棃娑卞剰缂佺姷鍠栭弻銊╂偄閸濆嫅銏ゆ倵濮橆剦妲洪柍褜鍓欑粻宥夊磿闁秴绠犻幖鎼厜缂嶆牠鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 | 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥ㄧ珶閸喆浠堢紒瀣儥濞兼牕鈹戦悩宕囶暡闁绘帡绠栭弻鐔虹磼閵忕姵鐏堢紓浣哄缂嶄線寮婚悢琛″亾濞戞瑡缂氶柣顓烆儑缁辨帡顢氶崱妯侯伓 | 闂傚倸鍊风粈浣虹礊婵犲洤缁╅弶鍫氭櫇閻瑩鏌″鍐ㄥ妞も晝鍏橀弻鐔兼倻濡鏆楅梺宕囨嚀缁夊綊寮诲澶婄厸濞达絽鎲″▓銊х磽娴g懓鏁鹃柟鍑ゆ嫹 | 缂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁鐤い鏍仜閸ㄥ倻鎲搁悧鍫濈瑲闁稿鍠愰妵鍕冀閵娿儺妫滈梺绋款儐閹稿骞忛崨鏉戠妞ゎ厽鍨堕ˉ宥夋⒒娴h櫣銆婇柡鍜佷邯楠炲繘鏁撻敓锟� | 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁绠犻煫鍥ㄧ☉缁€澶嬩繆閵堝懏瀚呯紓宥嗙墵閺屾盯鍩勯崘锛勭窗闂佸磭鎳撶粔鐢垫崲濠靛顥堟繛鎴炵懄閹瑩鎮跺鐐

Copyright (C) 1998-2025. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.