設萬維讀者為首頁 廣告服務 技術服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
簡體 繁體 手機版
分類廣告
版主:彎刀
萬維讀者網 > 競技沙龍 > 跟帖
Here is my take
送交者: CyberCat 2009月04月29日11:34:05 於 [競技沙龍] 發送悄悄話
回  答:  由 於
1. If his wife goes back to him, evidence or not is irrelevant.
2. If they agree on a divorce, evidence or not is irrelevant.
3. If it is a contested divorce, at least in some states he cannot introduce evidence of adultry on the court. Even if it is allowed, he will have to first consult with a lawyer to find out how to obtain the evidence legally.

If you want to use the evidence against the doctor, be aware that you don't commit extortion.
0%(0)
0%(0)
    本來離婚最好就是請一律師. 一了百了. - 網貓 04/29/09 (178)
  看吧,我就說有敲詐的嫌疑,會有問題的。 /無內容 - 快樂園丁 04/29/09 (149)
標  題 (必選項):
內  容 (選填項):
實用資訊
回國機票$360起 | 商務艙省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出爐:海航獲五星
海外華人福利!在線看陳建斌《三叉戟》熱血歸回 豪情築夢 高清免費看 無地區限制
一周點擊熱帖 更多>>
一周回復熱帖