中國遼寧航空母艦太快了：看看外國網民的震撼評論

散養的貓

發表於：2014-01-09 10:30

　　中國海軍已經完成首艘航母的試航，這是擴張海權的新證據，引起她的鄰居對其軍事野心的擔憂。

　　Ben Mills 16 hours ago

　　From memory this was onlyever planned as a training and development vessel in preparation for their ownnewly developed carrier.

　　記得這艘僅僅是訓練艦，為他們自己的新航母做準備。

　　JimmyRocker 17 hours ago

　　Most people here willprobably laugh at the Chinese carrier but buying it for so cheap andrefurbishing it was a good move! Better than the UK who have spent (￡6.2billion) on two carriers and we can't even afford to use one! Should have gonefor the second hand one and just bought some more F35s!

　　這的大部分人可能嘲笑中國的航母，但是以便宜的價格購買然後改進是個很好的方法!比英國強，兩艘航母花62億英鎊，我們甚至一艘都用不起!本應該買個二手的，再買更多的F35就行了。

　　、Ian Watson 16 hours ago

　　What, buy more of themdisastrous planes? We scrapped our Harriers for a plane that is currentlyunable to live up to a quarter of its claimed expectation, seriously overbudgetby billions, currently has the tactical advantage of planes in the 1960's....oh yes lets buy some more!

　　回樓上，什麼，買更多的杯具飛機?因為一個連標稱能力的四分之一都達不到的飛機廢掉我們的航母?嚴重的超預算，目前只有60年代性能的飛機…哦，是的，讓我們再多買點!

　　aitcH 7 hours ago

　　Second-hand junk. Keelelaid 1985 December 6, incomplete hull launched on 1988 December 4 then it sataround incomplete for lack of funds.

　　It's electronics appear to be on the thin side, too.

　　Luckily VietNam has just bought four Russian-built submarines, so they willhave something to practice on.

　　二手的廢物。1985年12月6日開建，1988年12月4日未完成的艦體下水，因為缺少資金而閒置。

　　它的電子設備看起來也是不足的。

　　幸運的是越南剛剛買了四艘俄羅斯潛艇，所以他們也會練點什麼。

　　plutonium 14 hours ago

　　Always slating off China,hardly democratic here are we? Arresting people for twittering comments about LeeRigbys murderer! Jealousys a wonderful thing!

　　總是叱責中國，我們這幾乎沒有民主了嗎?因為LeeRigbys謀殺案逮捕推特用戶!嫉妒美好的事情!

　　Ian Watson 16 hours ago

　　I always find it somewhatamusing when all these experts claim this and that, feting the"great" American military machine whilst demoting the Chinese orRussian units as some sort of inferior machine, who is kidding who?

　　Remember folks, the Chinese can with apparent ease call up an armed forcebigger than the whole population of the US, the Chinese think along Russianlines in that they got plenty of bodies to spare and sooner or later the otherside will run out of bullets, exactly what happened to the Germans who werecock a hoop and within a few short weeks had run out of ammo, supplies and wererouted which didn't stop until they got back to Berlin.

　　我總是覺得那些說三道四的專家有些可笑，吹捧偉大的美國軍事裝備，貶低中國和俄國的東西是次品，誰在開誰的玩笑?

　　顯然中國可以輕鬆的召集比整個美國人口都多的軍隊，中國人和俄國人想的一樣，因為他們有許多人備用，遲早對手的子彈會打光，就像德國人發生的那樣，德國人得意洋洋，幾個星期內便打光了彈藥，補給，隨後便是不可阻擋的潰敗，一直退到柏林。

　　、koe 15 hours ago

　　The US military budget,is bigger than the combined budget of the whole world, that should give someindication of their technological advantage. I am not saying the Chinese areinadequate merely that they still have some catching up to do.

　　Comparing Russia in WW2 (i.e near unlimited bodies) to China in a modern warscenario, is disingenuous. US nuclear and shielding capabilities would makeshort work of China.

　　美軍的子彈比全世界的人口都多，並且技術先進。我不是說中國能力不足，僅僅是說他們還有一些要追趕的。

　　拿二戰中的俄國(例如無限的炮灰)和現代戰爭中的中國比就是抬槓。美國的核武器和防禦能力將會快速解決中國。

　　、Jonathan Smith 7 hours ago

　　They know that they cancrush the US economically.

　　他們知道，他們可以搞垮美國經濟。

　　、jake masoc 15 hours ago(狒狒)

　　Thats on land, but in thesea and air the US is decades ahead of the Chinese.

　　這是在陸地上，在海洋和天空，美國比中國先進幾十年。

　　HonchoSmokebox 19 hours ago

　　Yeah - just a quick scarestory to worry us about the big, nasty Chinese navy.

　　The US spends about 4.5% of its GDP - about $682 billion each year on itsmilitary. That's almost 40% of all the military spending in the world.

　　China spends just over 2% - about $166 billion, which is less than 10% of thetotal military spending in the world.

　　Woooh! Watch out for those scary Chinese.

　　是的，僅僅是一個使我們煩惱的龐大而討厭的中國海軍的嚇人故事。

　　美國軍費占GDP的4.5%，大約6820億美元每年。那幾乎是世界軍費總額的40%。

　　中國軍費占GDP2%，大約1660億美元，占全球軍費不到10%。

　　喔~小心這些可怕的中國人。

　　、Chris Townsend 17 hours ago

　　The $166 Billion isn'tclose to the real amount. You don't launch 3 new stealth fighters in a year onthat budget.

　　1660億美元離真實的費用差得遠呢。以這樣的預算你不可能一年內試飛3種新型隱形飛機。

　　jake masoc 2 hours ago(狒狒)

　　That pile of rusting junkwill be on the seabed shortly after China tries to take on the Yanks.

　　在中國試着去挑戰美國後很快那就會成為一堆海底的廢鐵。

　　jake masoc 15 hours ago(狒狒)

　　It has no arrestor systemso once the one j-15 launches it cannot land back on this rust bucket.

　　Maybe this 1950s Ukranian mothballed heap of junk is just a teat bed for thefuture. I bet the US is quaking in its boots.

　　沒有阻攔系統，一旦J15起飛，就不能降落回這個破鐵桶上了。

　　可能這個50年代烏克蘭封存的垃圾在未來就是個廢材。我猜美國一定緊張得發抖。

　　thepainter 18 hours ago

　　Wow a J-15 took off fromthis "aircraft carrier" , whatever next . . .

　　哇哦，J15從“航母”上起飛，後面就不管了…

　　jake masoc 19 hours ago(狒狒)

　　An old rust bucket fromthe Soviet era. May have been modernized but still a rust bucket.

　　蘇聯時代的破舊水桶。可能現代化改裝了但依然是破水桶。

　　、malcolmbrhc 17 hours ago

　　Hitler used to saysomething similar about Ukrainian tanks as compared with Panzers. Didn't workout well for him...

　　回樓上，希特勒也對烏克蘭坦克說過相似的話。看來沒什麼作用…

　　Thwyllo 18 hours ago

　　Fourteen years to refurba second-hand aircraft carrier? Says it all really.

　　14年改裝一個二艘航母?真的已經說明一切了。

　　malcolmbrhc 17 hours ago

　　Yes, the Chinese areobviously rubbish at technology. Shanghai to Beijing rail journey time ispathetic really. The recent moon landing was just a fluke. And I bet you aretyping your response on a thoroughly inferior Chinese made computer.

　　是的，中國人的技術顯然很垃圾。上海到北京的鐵路速度真的很可悲。近來的登月就是僥倖。我打賭你是用中國產的次品電腦打的這條回復。

　　、multifinlayson 16 hours ago

　　All the technology youcite was invented outside China.

　　你說的這些技術都不是中國發明的。