美國伯克驅逐艦下水後，中國才出現旅滬;美國核動力航母遊行在海面的時候，中國的都是一些性能落後的艦艇;F16和大黃蜂裝備的時候，中國的飛機還是J7、J8;美國的F22也服役了，中國的自行研製的三代機才裝備不久。

中國現在有052C和已下水的052D;中國現在有遼寧號和自己正在建造的國產航母自己下餃子似的054A;中國現在有也有了J10 J11和J15;中國的四代機J20去年試飛，J31也在前幾天試飛。

我們知道差距、但是我們一直在努力、進步、追趕。你們就像帖子中的那句話一樣“你們就盡情取笑吧，總有一天你再也笑不出來”。

在此感謝中國軍工！

摸索的魚 07陸軍 中尉

我非常高興,倒退三十年,你能想象美國人會那麼在意中國的發展嗎?會拿他們最高科技的產品跟中國比嗎?不會,因為那時候他們超級自信,超級高傲,中國的建設成績在他們眼裡不值一提,現在呢?中國每前進一步,都會引發美國人的吵鬧,上自美國總統大選,下到小白鬼子的上網發貼,沒一處不顯示出美國的忐忑和惱火,為逐漸失去所謂的優勢而擔憂.

------------------------

以下是美國（外國）網民的評論：

OG_Locc

"placing the rising Asian power just behind the U.S."

LOL. Really?

If by "just behind" - you mean multiple decades - this shitty hack job of an article is spot on. LMAO

“這個崛起中的亞洲大國僅次於美國”

笑，真的嗎？

如果真是“僅次於”，那麼你說的是僅落後幾十年吧。粗製濫造的文章由此可見一斑。笑翻了。

stardave2020

Agreed, China is like 60 years behind us. As long as they don't have FREEDOM!!! and DEMOCRACY!!! they will always be behind.

It is not like they are the largest manufacturing nation on earth, it is not like they have a economy to support it, it is not like they are investing massively into their education and future generation. And of course it is not like they are white.

So yeah, China will always be behind US as long as the human species continue to exist.

USA!!! USA!!!!

同意，中國落後我們60年。只要沒有自由和民主，他們就會永遠落後。

中國是世界最大的製造國，有一個可供支撐的經濟，在下一代的教育上大規模投資，然而民主和自由不是以上方面可以比擬的。當然，也不在於他們不是白人。

所以，只要人種仍然存在下去，中國就會一直落後美國。

美國！美國！

Toby1

Chinese aviation has a long way to go before they catch up with US tech. That is just a simple fact.

中國航空業要想追上美國，還有很長一段路要走。這是簡單的事實。

stardave2020

Ok let me summarize 90% of response here

1. USA STRONG!!!!!

2. China weak

3. USA REAL STEATH!!!!

4. China 60 years behind

5. USA STRONG!!!!!!

6. Cheap Chinese clone

7. USA STRONG!!!!!!!

there ya go.

好吧，讓我總結下這裡90%的評論。

1、美國強！

2、中國弱

3、美國戰機真正隱形

4、中國落後60年

5、美國強！

6、中國廉價複製

7、美國強！

OG_Locc

China's only about 20 something years behind on the stealth aspect. But you're right, they're about 50 years behind on the engine technology.

中國在隱形方面只落後大約20年。不過你說得對，他們在發動機技術上落後大約50年。

Thomas

my wife loves Chinese made Chanel hand bags, they look real and are cheap!!! I would get a pair of Oakley sun glasses myself, but I'm just afraid my eyeballs will get sun burned without that UV coating they put on the lenses. LOL

我妻子喜歡中國產的香奈兒手袋，看起來逼真又便宜！我自己本想買一副奧克利太陽鏡，不過擔心鏡片上沒有塗防紫外線塗料而眼睛被灼傷，笑。

Thomas

We buy Chinese products everyday because we don't have much of a choice: everything is made in China! The Chinese labor is so cheap, I love it! But poor little red commie guys, I feel sorry for them working to death in sweatshops 12 hours days for $1 while I buy a shit load of fun stuff to enjoy in my free time (hahah, get it? FREE time....FREEDOM?). At least the Chinese workers only have one child to feed, its cheaper that way too.

我們每天都買中國貨，因為沒得選擇：每一件東西都是中國產！中國勞動力非常便宜，我喜歡！不過要為可憐赤色小共表示遺憾，他們為了1美元在血汗工廠每天累死累活上班12個小時，而我在自由時間裡買一大堆東西來享受（哈哈，懂沒？自由時間...自由？）。至少中國工人只要撫養一個小孩，那樣負擔也更輕就是了。

BANSAK9214

It will in no way be able to compete with Japan's new F-3 TigerLion...now also in secret development.

絕對無法與日本正在秘密開發的F-3 TigerLion戰機競爭。

Lee Powney

China 2011 trade SURPLUS= $155.14 billion USD

USA 2011 trade DEFICIT $558 billion USD

USA 2010 spending on defence $683.7 billion USD

I dont think they will be behind for long... get used to it

中國2011年貿易盈餘1551.4億美元

美國201年貿易赤字5580億美元

美國2010年軍費開支6837億美元

我認為他們不會落後多久...你會習慣的。

Jimsworld

This is great news!

We may need help in pushing back the next alien invasion, and with China helping us out we might even have a chance.

(cause without the USA, China is is just a back water 3rd world country - who else is going to buy there ‘Made in China’ plastic - I suppose Russia will

這是好消息！

在打退外星人的入侵時，我們可能需要幫忙。有了中國的幫助，我們或許有勝算。

沒有美國，中國就是個落後的第三世界國家——誰還會購買“中國造”的塑料製品——我猜俄羅斯會

quackula1

China would like to thank the following corporations for their contributions:

Boeing

Lockheed-Martin

Military Contractors and Sub Contractors

"Thanks for letting us steal your technology"

中國會想感謝以下公司的貢獻：

1、波音

2、洛克希德馬丁

3、軍備承包商和分包商

“謝謝讓我們偷你們的技術”

PeteEllis

So, all we really know is that it looks high tech and can fly. Right? How is this a huge leap forward for the Falcon Eagle? Last I heard the Chinese were relying on Russian made engines for their warplanes.

所以我們真正知道的就是看起來高科技和可以飛，對吧？怎麼會是巨大飛躍？我上次聽說中國戰機依賴俄羅斯提供發動機。

Federale

Stealth? It looks like an F-15 copy.

隱形戰機？看起來就像是F-15飛機的復製品。

Tim Culley

This is such a gross exaggeration of Chinese air power it is irresponsible.

China is perhaps 35 years away from having a fleet comparable to that of the United States TODAY. You make it sound as though they are about to become the worlds strongest air power which is completely misleading. The gap will only widen in the future.

把中國空軍力量說得太誇張了吧，這是不負責任的。

要想打造堪比當今美國的艦隊，中國還需要35年的時間。你說得好像中國空軍快要成為世界最強大空軍一樣，這完全是誤導。差距在未來只會擴大。

fabio gonzalez

I guess spying does pay off for the chinese.

我認為中國人的間諜活動確實成功。

MauriceAGuarin

This just amazes me how the Chinese military has come so far in aviation

震驚了，中國空軍已經走得如此之遠。

goldeneye

It's one prototype with old-generation major parts. The US has over 100 F-22's in service...

這是用上一代機型主要零件拼裝起來的原型機。美國已經服役100多架F-22隱形戰機...

hnlee

Though everyone looks down upon them today, the Chinese is a very smart race. They can come up with products that could be ultimately surprise everyone.

All you need is very smart people and money, and they have got both.

So laugh as you like and one day you will laugh no more.

雖然大家今天看不起中國人，不過他們是非常聰明的種族，可以生產出最終讓每個人吃驚的產品。

你所需要的一切就是聰明的人和錢。中國人兩個都有。

所以你就盡情取笑吧，總有一天你再也笑不出來。

majrod

They might have "smart people" but once other people stop coming up with new ideas to copy you're kind of stuck. I'll be much more concerned when China invents something. Until then we need to get serious about security and tech transfer. That will slow the Chinese down a decade.

他們或許有“聰明人”，不過一旦別人沒有推出新創意讓其山寨，他們就卡住了。我更關注中國什麼時候發明一些東西。在此之前，我們需要嚴重關切技術安全和技術轉移，這樣可以延緩中國發展達十年之久。

GerardAlvarado

maybe you should move to china them

也許你應該搬到中國去。

goldeneye

Note the non-stealthy engine outlets, old-style. Also the steep, sharp angles on everything; which is against stealth.

注意看不符合隱形設計的發動機外沿。還有遍布機身的稜稜角角，這些都不符合隱形設計。

stardave2020

Come on guys, don't disappoint me, let all the butthurt comment flow in.

Don't forget to include the following points.

1. Cheap Chinese Copy

2. 10000% as a result of Chinese hackers

3. Just a single technology demonstrator with no ability to produce more

etc. etc...

Come on "China experts" it is time for you to shine.

加油，各位，別讓我失望，把所有惱羞成怒的言論都放上來吧。

別忘了包括以下幾點：

1、廉價的中國復製品

2、100%是中國黑客偷來的技術

3、只是一架展示技術的原型機，沒有能力批量生產

等等...

加油，現在該是“中國專家” 光芒四射的時候了。

goldeyene

But it'll turn out to be just a copy of old US stealth technology. It doesn't seem to be completely stealthy either. It's a huge plane for a *fighter.* How could it dogfight anyone? Its big & clumsy, 3rd rate, Chinese copy-cat *technology.*

結果會是美國老款隱形技術的復製品。看起來也不像具有完全隱形能力。作為戰機來說體積太龐大。怎麼空戰？這是中國三流山寨技術生產出來的龐大笨拙戰機。

johnboy4546

"It's a huge plane for a *fighter.* "

It appears to be significantly smaller than the Su-27 flying alongside it, and the Su-27 is most definitely a fighter

“作為戰機來說體積太龐大”。

——似乎明顯比伴飛的蘇-27飛機更小。毫無疑問，蘇-27是戰機。

Tim Culley

No offense but I'm not sure that the plane deserves to be called "stealth just because the outside is a little smoother looking. What evidence do you have that this plane actually has a reduced radar/thermal cross section?

請勿見怪，不過我不確定這架飛機是否僅因為更平整就配得上隱形稱號。還有哪些證據可以證明這架飛機的雷達截面積確實降低了？

aggielawyer

It's pretty easy to slam through a stealth fighter development plan when you can steal designs and technology from other countries. You can also save money on design and development AND, in the case of China, on labor costs.

當你可以從其他國家偷來設計和技術時，全力發展隱形戰機就相當簡單了。你可以節約一大筆設計和開發費用。就中國而言，還可以降低勞動力成本。

Blair Toland

The Chinese can't even figure out how to make a jet engine that doesn't grenade after five hours...Their stealth attempts are basic propaganda at best, death traps for their poor pilots at worse. Let me know when they stop buying engines from Vladimir.

中國人連飛機發動機都搗鼓不出來，他們開發的隱形戰機最多是用於宣傳的基本型，是可憐飛行員的死亡陷阱。我倒想看看他們什麼時候不再向弗拉基米爾·普京購買發動機。

Chuckiechan

The best technology ever stolen.

這是偷來的最好技術