矢板明夫說三道四，現在的中國為何遍地“張獻忠”？(bilingual 雙語) Yaita Akio talks about this and that. Why is there so many "Zhang Xianzhong" in China now?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyF1x0wwTkA

美國之音中文網

Nov 18, 2024

近來珠海、無錫等地接連發生無差別殺人的惡性報復社會事件，被稱為“張獻忠現象”。其原因有，社會不滿的聲音沒有渠道發泄、共產黨多年灌輸的仇恨教育、政府喪失了處理問題的手段。矢板明夫說三道四，為您深入解讀。

@長征組歌 11 hours ago

怎樣評價89.64？

中國紅旗網 百家爭鳴 賀春生 2016-9-4

   64運動的積極方面是反鄧、反腐敗，反官倒。是文化大革命以後由大學生發起的既有文革的形式，又有資產階級民主憲政內容的小資產階級革命性質的政治運動。

    尤其是它的後期，明顯的被美國西化派、自由派，顏色革命所控制。

    這也是鄧小平後期借用所謂四項基本原則殘酷血腥鎮壓學生運動的一個理由。學生運動來勢很猛，矛頭是直指鄧氏集團的。鄧小平絕不允許文化大革命重演，必須得把這場運動鎮壓下去。經過相當長的時間的預謀，學生運動組織內部在大量混進西化派分子參與和主導的情況下，後期其性質明顯的帶有顏色革命的特點。這也是鄧小平準備鎮壓學生運動，所事先安插的或與美國串通，利用西化派民主勢力的派遣與明顯滲透的配合，為鎮壓這次學生運動找到的藉口。

    美國在利用顏色革命搞垮別的國家的時候，並不是一概都推翻這個國家的現政權的（對於特色中國的處理方式就是如此），而是在政治、軍事、經濟、文化等領域實施全面的高壓並加之和平演變的技倆使之完全屈從的情況下與現政權在非常隱蔽的頻繁接觸中，隨時權衡着是與這個國家共建和保持一種逼奸和交媾的奴役關係，經濟利益來得更容易些，還是推翻現政權重建一個新的傀儡政權為美國輸送的經濟利益來得更容易些。所以，64運動後期，美國默許了鄧小平的法西斯血腥鎮壓學生運動的殘暴計劃，最後，邊喊邊退虛張聲勢的撤出了這場角斗。

    89.64學生運動，就是這樣的一鍋夾生飯。在鄧小平徹底投靠美國的前提下，美國決定保留特色偽共，這樣既可以達到美國顛覆這個原本屬於共產黨領導的國家的目的，又可以使顛覆的成本降到最低，而利益卻可以最大化。也就是說暫時可以不使用武力，就可以控制這個國家。用中國古典戰法（孫子兵法）解釋，這就叫“上兵伐謀（攻心為上）、其次伐交、其次伐兵、其下攻城”。

    今天看來，這場鬥爭除了美國背後導演的外部因素以外，核心問題只不過是特色黨內資產階級這一派與那一派的爭鬥，也就是鄧小平改開復辟的穩健派與趙紫陽等復辟倒退的自由派的爭鬥。實質上是一場統治階級內部的飽狗和餓狗的爭鬥，台上狗和正在準備上台的台下狗的爭鬥。他們不論哪一方面取得勝利，與無產階級和全國廣大人民群眾的根本利益都沒有正面的關係。

    今天的復辟現實，特色現在所走的道路，正是當年64運動的鄧小平改開復辟的穩健派與趙紫陽等復辟倒退的自由派們所要走的同一的道路。他們的區別僅在於是早一天全面復辟資本主義走蘇聯解體的道路，還是不急於求成、用溫水煮青蛙的辦法，寧可晚一天但一定要穩妥的復辟帶有中國特色的資本主義。

    因為，鄧小平復辟資本主義要的是求穩，要的是“摸着石頭過河”，要的是“溫水煮青蛙”，他不允許搞激變，怕翻船！而自由派，也就是激進派，是嫌復辟的進程太慢，急功近利，企圖一夜變天，直接走西方民主憲政的資本主義道路。為了能夠復辟成功和在權力爭奪中穩操勝券，鄧小平因此敢冒天下之大不韙，不惜動用坦克部隊，借用軍隊中的嫡系力量對64學生運動進行了殘酷的血腥鎮壓，對天安門廣場進行了連資本主義國家也輕易不敢做的大屠殺和血洗。製造了震驚中外慘絕人寰的血案。鄧小平老謀深算，一舉平定了動亂，並為自己名正言順的登台掛印鋪平了道路。當然這都是在美國的或明或暗的策應下實現的。

    今天的社會現實，特色現在所走的道路，正是當年64運動復辟倒退的自由派們所要走的道路。只不過是按照鄧小平總設計的穩健方案進行的，而不是按照自由派或蘇聯戈爾巴喬夫式的激進方案進行的。40年來，他的陰謀暫時地得逞了。當今的一切政策和走向，都是鄧小平總設計方案的繼續，鄧小平與江澤民、與胡錦濤，與習近平的關係，只不過是接力棒的關係，傳承的關係，繼續的關係。在這條復辟資本主義的道路上，他們只是20步和30步的關係，50步和100步的關係，是由特色社會主義過渡到特色資本主義，再由特色自由資本主義過渡到特色壟斷資本主義直到今天的特色官僚權貴資產階級法西斯主義的幾個過程。

    這正驗證了毛主席當年的預言：“修正主義上台，就是資本主義上台，而且是最壞的資本主義，是法西斯主義。”

    所以，當年的64運動，實際上並沒有多少積極的革命意義，更沒有象有些人所說的那樣是無產階級文化大革命的繼續。當時許多人看不清這個問題，這是可以理解的。但是在今天，我們無產階級和全國人民，特別是有一定的階級鬥爭和政治鬥爭覺悟，有一定的馬列毛主義理論認知的革命者，就一定要看清這個問題，決不能被錯誤的輿論所利用，再犯政治上的幼稚的低級錯誤。

    然而，“共產黨人到處支持一切反對現存的社會制度和政治制度的革命運動。”（《共產黨宣言》285頁）而且，共產黨人還堅持無產階級要有自己的革命運動。這個運動就是消滅私有制，推翻資產階級專政，建立無產階級專政，重新實現社會主義。並且還要堅持：“他們的目的，只有用暴力推翻全部現存的社會制度，才能達到。”（《共產黨宣言》285頁）的這條唯一正確的根本途徑！

Translation

Yaita Akio talks about this and that. Why is there so many "Zhang Xianzhong" in China now?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyF1x0wwTkA

Voice of America Chinese Network

Nov 18, 2024

Recently, Zhuhai, Wuxi and other places have successively experienced vicious social revenge incidents of indiscriminate killings, which are called the "Zhang Xianzhong phenomenon". The reasons include that there is no channel for the voices of social dissatisfaction to vent, the Communist Party has been instilling hatred education for many years, and the government has lost the means to deal with problems. Yaita Akio talks about this and that, and gives you an in-depth interpretation.

@長征組歌 11 hours ago

How do you evaluate 89.64?

China Red Flag Network Hundred Schools of Thought He Chunsheng 2016-9-4

The positive aspects of the 64 movement are anti-Deng, anti-corruption, and anti-official corruption. It is a petty-bourgeois revolutionary political movement initiated by college students after the Cultural Revolution, which has both the form of the Cultural Revolution and the content of bourgeois democratic constitutionalism.

Especially in its later period, it was obviously controlled by the Westernization faction, liberals, and color revolutions in the United States.

This was also a reason for Deng Xiaoping to use the so-called four basic principles to brutally and bloodily suppress the student movement in the later period. The student movement was very fierce, and the spearhead was directly aimed at the Deng group. Deng Xiaoping would never allow the Cultural Revolution to happen again, and this movement must be suppressed. After a long period of premeditation, with a large number of Westernization factions participating and leading the student movement organization, its nature in the later period was obviously characterized by color revolution. This was also Deng Xiaoping's preparation to suppress the student movement, and he arranged it in advance or colluded with the United States, using the dispatch of Westernization faction democratic forces and the obvious infiltration to find an excuse to suppress this student movement.

When the United States uses color revolutions to bring down other countries, it does not overthrow the current regime of the country in general (this is how it handles China with special characteristics). Instead, it implements comprehensive high pressure in the political, military, economic, and cultural fields, and uses the technique of peaceful evolution to make it completely submissive. In very covert and frequent contacts with the current regime, it weighs at any time whether it is easier to build and maintain a slave relationship of rape and copulation with the country, or to overthrow the current regime and rebuild a new puppet regime to deliver economic benefits to the United States. Therefore, in the late stage of the June 4th Movement, the United States acquiesced to Deng Xiaoping's brutal plan of fascist bloody suppression of the student movement, and finally withdrew from the fight with a bluff while shouting and retreating.

The June 4th student movement in 1989 was such a half-cooked meal. Under the premise that Deng Xiaoping completely surrendered to the United States, the United States decided to retain the special pseudo-communism, so that it could achieve the goal of subverting the country originally led by the Communist Party, and minimize the cost of subversion, while maximizing the benefits. In other words, it can control the country without using force for the time being. To explain it in the Chinese classical tactics (Sun Tzu's Art of War), this is called "the best strategy is to attack the enemy's mind (attacking the enemy's heart is the best), the next best is to attack the enemy's alliances, the next best is to attack the enemy's troops, and the worst is to attack the enemy's city".

Today, apart from the external factors directed by the United States, the core issue of this struggle is nothing more than a struggle between one faction of the bourgeoisie within the party with characteristics, that is, a struggle between the conservative faction of Deng Xiaoping's reform and opening up and the liberal faction of restoration and regression such as Zhao Ziyang. In essence, it is a struggle between the well-fed dogs and the hungry dogs within the ruling class, and between the dogs on the stage and the dogs off the stage who are preparing to take the stage. No matter which side they win, it has no positive relationship with the fundamental interests of the proletariat and the broad masses of the people across the country.

Today's restoration reality, the path that the characteristics are taking now, is exactly the same path that the conservative faction of Deng Xiaoping's reform and opening up and restoration and the liberal faction of restoration and regression such as Zhao Ziyang wanted to take in the June 4th Movement. The difference between them is that they would rather restore capitalism one day earlier and follow the path of the Soviet Union's disintegration, or not rush for success and use the method of boiling frogs in warm water, and would rather restore capitalism with Chinese characteristics one day later but steadily.

Because Deng Xiaoping's restoration of capitalism requires stability, "crossing the river by feeling the stones", and "boiling frogs in warm water". He does not allow radical changes for fear of capsizing! The liberals, that is, the radicals, think that the restoration process is too slow, and they are eager for quick success and instant benefits. They attempt to change the world overnight and directly follow the capitalist path of Western democratic constitutionalism. In order to restore successfully and win the power struggle, Deng Xiaoping dared to risk the world's disapproval and did not hesitate to use tank troops and borrow the direct forces of the army to carry out a brutal and bloody suppression of the 1989 student movement, and carried out a massacre and bloodbath in Tiananmen Square that even capitalist countries dare not do easily. It created a bloodbath that shocked China and the world. Deng Xiaoping was very shrewd and shrewd. He put down the turmoil in one fell swoop and paved the way for his legitimate accession to the throne. Of course, this was achieved with the overt or covert support of the United States.

Today's social reality, the path that the characteristics of China are taking now is exactly the path that the liberals who wanted to restore and regress in the June 4th Movement wanted to take. It's just that it is carried out according to the prudent plan designed by Deng Xiaoping, rather than the radical plan of the liberals or the Soviet Union Gorbachev. For 40 years, his conspiracy has temporarily succeeded. All current policies and trends are the continuation of the plan designed by Deng Xiaoping. The relationship between Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin, Hu Jintao, and Xi Jinping is just a baton relationship, a relationship of inheritance, and a relationship of continuation. On this road to the restoration of capitalism, they are only 20 steps and 30 steps, 50 steps and 100 steps. It is a few processes of transition from socialism with Chinese characteristics to capitalism with Chinese characteristics, and then from free capitalism with Chinese characteristics to monopoly capitalism with Chinese characteristics until today's bureaucratic and powerful bourgeois fascism with Chinese characteristics.

This just proves Chairman Mao's prediction: "When revisionism comes to power, capitalism comes to power, and the worst kind of capitalism is fascism."

Therefore, the June 4th Movement did not actually have much positive revolutionary significance, nor was it a continuation of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution as some people say. It is understandable that many people did not see this issue clearly at that time. But today, we, the proletariat and the people of the whole country, especially revolutionaries who have a certain level of class struggle and political struggle awareness and a certain level of Marxist-Leninist-Maoist theoretical cognition, must see this issue clearly and must not be used by erroneous public opinion to make naive and low-level political mistakes again.

However, "Communists support all revolutionary movements against the existing social and political systems everywhere." (The Communist Manifesto, page 285) Moreover, the Communists insist that the proletariat must have its own revolutionary movement. This movement is to eliminate private ownership, overthrow the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, establish the dictatorship of the proletariat, and re-realize socialism. And we must also insist on the only correct and fundamental path: "Their goal can only be achieved by violently overthrowing all existing social systems." (The Communist Manifesto, page 285)