終結戰爭，重建全球共生新秩序計劃書

錢 宏（Archer Hong Qian）

Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation（Canada）

前言

人類歷史充斥着戰爭與衝突，給地球生靈帶來了深重的災難。在孞息-AI時代，個體生命的自組織連接與平衡力空前喚醒，社區共生體的自治逐漸成為可能。伴隨着地球村式全球化進程的加速，各國相互依存度日益提高，迫切需要建立一個以人權與主權“交互主體共生”為核心的新型國際秩序。此種秩序將讓任何統治全世界的帝國、聯盟或軸心政治企圖成為事實上的不可能，以實現持久和平與繁榮。

問題的提出

俄烏戰爭的爆發與發展既是意外，也是現行國際秩序缺陷的集中體現。

1. 一個意外的開端 2014年，普京接受克里米亞“公投結果”並將其併入俄羅斯，這一決定讓國際法遭受重創。彼時，普京若選擇不接受公投結果，他既能占據國際道義的制高點，又能將難題留給烏克蘭當局。然而，他的選擇，讓俄羅斯的戰略從防禦性變為擴張性，激化了俄烏矛盾，也埋下了更深的衝突種子。

2. 烏克蘭的抗爭出乎預料 2022年，俄軍入侵烏克蘭東部和基輔，企圖通過閃電戰迅速控制烏克蘭。然而，一個“漫威式”的超級英雄澤連斯基的出現改變了局面。他拒絕逃離基輔，憑藉2017年川普第一個任期內獲得的標槍反坦克導彈等武器和全民武裝支持下，烏克蘭頑強抵抗，挫敗了俄軍的戰略。俄烏戰爭的意外性由此彰顯：一個看似註定的勝利卻陷入了曠日持久的僵局。

3. 主權與人權的根本矛盾 俄烏戰爭不僅暴露了軍事失誤，也揭示了現行國際秩序的深層問題：如何在“保護人權的主權神聖不可侵犯”與“高門檻的民族自決”之間找到平衡？ 工商文明時代的國際秩序基於主權與人權的“平等主體”邏輯，已經無法應對多元化、全球化的新挑戰。 必須提升到孞息-AI時代的“交互主體共生”認知與實踐，才能突破這一困境。

目標

終結現有戰爭與衝突：通過和平手段解決當前國際衝突，特別是俄烏戰爭，避免人類進一步的傷亡和破壞。

重建全球和平新秩序：建立以交互主體共生哲學為基礎的國際關係框架，促進各國和平共處與合作發展。

策略與措施

1. 推動衝突各方停火與談判 在國際組織主持下，促使衝突各方立即停火，開展和平談判，為下一步解決方案奠定基礎。

2. 實施“第三條道路”方案

（1）俄羅斯軍隊撤出 俄羅斯軍隊撤出1991年規定的烏克蘭所有占領區，歸還被擄掠的烏克蘭兒童。 烏克蘭軍隊與國際組織保障俄軍撤退的安全，防止新衝突的爆發。

（2）高門檻的獨立自決與中立緩衝區 克里米亞等爭議地區：根據“公民（民族）自決”原則，在聯合國託管理事會和人權理事會合署機構監督下，通過公投成為新的主權國家。

50年併入限制：為防止新爭端，新獨立國家50年內不得併入任何相鄰國家（如克里米亞不可併入俄羅斯）。

（3）加里寧格勒州的調整 作為政治平衡，俄羅斯最西部的加里寧格勒州（柯尼斯堡）在同樣監督下成為新的主權國家，如“柯尼斯堡共和國”，並保持中立。

（4）國際社會的讓步 國際社會免除對俄羅斯領導人的戰爭罪追究，解除對其外匯儲備的凍結，用於俄羅斯的經濟重建與發展。

1. 建立國際監督與保障機制 託管理事會的重構：重新激活聯合國託管理事會，與人權理事會合署，作為公投與中立機制的執行機構，未來更名為“全球共生理事會”（UN Global Symbiosis Council）。 透明技術支持：利用AI與區塊鏈確保監督與執行過程透明、可信。

2. 推動“小而美”國家模式 借鑑瑞士、比利時、新加坡等成功經驗，鼓勵多元文化地區建立小型獨立國家，促進區域穩定與發展。

3. 制定《全球共生公約》 以交互主體共生哲學為基礎，制定國際公約，規範國家、社區、個人間關係，為全球和平合作提供制度保障。 預期成果 實現衝突地區的和平：終結當前戰爭，實現地區穩定。 建立新的國際關係模式：以交互主體共生為核心，構建新的國際安全框架，減少衝突，促進合作。

建構孞聯網實時勰調機制：動態評估真偽、善惡、美醜、智慧愚昧等多維度行為，形成實時調控體系。激勵積極行為，抑制破壞性行為，實現全球範圍內的行為自組織調節。

結論

終結戰爭，重建全球和平新秩序的核心在於創新的第三條道路，它通過高門檻的獨立自決與國際監督機制，平衡主權與人權，確保和平與穩定。同時，通過《全球共生公約》和全球共生理事會的建立，為國際社會提供一個長期合作的框架。

如此一來，不僅俄烏戰爭將得以終結，更讓任何統治全世界的帝國、聯盟或軸心政治企圖成為事實上的不可能，為人類邁向和平與共生開啟全新的篇章。

Ending Wars, Rebuilding a New Global Symbiosis Order

By Archer Hong Qian

Institution: Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation (Canada)

Foreword

Human history has been filled with wars and conflicts, bringing profound disasters to all living beings on Earth. In the Xinsi-AI era, the self-organizing and balancing capabilities of individual lives are awakening like never before, enabling the possibility of community symbiosis and autonomy. With the accelerated globalization of the global village and the growing interdependence among nations, it is imperative to establish a new type of international order centered on “intersubjective symbiosis” of human rights and sovereignty. Such an order would render any attempt at global domination by empires, alliances, or axis powers factually impossible, paving the way for lasting peace and prosperity.

Problem

The Unpredictable Nature of the Russia-Ukraine War and the Deficiencies of the Current International Order

1. An Unexpected Beginning

In 2014, Putin accepted the results of the Crimea referendum and annexed the region into Russia, which severely undermined international law. At the time, if Putin had refrained from accepting the referendum, he could have maintained his moral high ground, left the dilemma to the Ukrainian authorities, and still garnered support from a pro-Russian Crimea. However, his decision shifted Russia’s strategy from defensive to expansionist, escalating Russia-Ukraine tensions and planting the seeds for deeper conflicts.

1. Ukraine’s Unexpected Resistance

In 2022, Russian forces invaded Eastern Ukraine and Kyiv, intending to swiftly control the country through a blitzkrieg. However, the emergence of a "Marvel-like" superhero, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, dramatically altered the course of events. Refusing to flee Kyiv, Zelenskyy relied on anti-tank Javelin missiles provided during Trump’s first term in 2017 and widespread public mobilization to mount a staunch resistance. Ukraine’s determined defense thwarted Russia’s plans, turning a seemingly certain victory into a prolonged stalemate and showcasing the unpredictable nature of this war.

1. The Fundamental Contradiction Between Sovereignty and Human Rights

The Russia-Ukraine War not only exposed military miscalculations but also highlighted a profound flaw in the current international order: How can we reconcile the principles of "the inviolability of sovereign rights" and "high-threshold national self-determination"?

• The industrial civilization era’s international order, based on the "equal subject" logic of sovereignty and human rights, is no longer adequate to address the challenges of a diverse and globalized world.

• It is necessary to elevate this framework to the Xinsi-AI era’s “intersubjective symbiosis” paradigm to overcome these dilemmas.

Goals

1. End Current Wars and Conflicts: Resolve ongoing international conflicts, particularly the Russia-Ukraine War, through peaceful means to prevent further human suffering and destruction.

2. Rebuild a New Global Peace Order: Establish an international relations framework based on the philosophy of intersubjective symbiosis, fostering peaceful coexistence and cooperative development among nations.

Strategies and Measures

1. Promote Ceasefires and Negotiations

Under the auspices of international organizations, urge all parties involved in conflicts to immediately cease hostilities and engage in peace talks to lay the groundwork for solutions.

1. Implement the "Third Path" Proposal

(1) Russian Troop Withdrawal

• Russian forces must withdraw from all occupied Ukrainian territories defined by the 1991 internationally recognized borders and return abducted Ukrainian children.

• The Ukrainian military and international organizations will ensure the safe retreat of Russian forces to prevent further conflicts.

(2) High-Threshold Independence and Neutral Buffer Zones

• Disputed Territories such as Crimea: In accordance with the principle of “national (citizen) self-determination,” allow disputed regions to become new sovereign states through referenda supervised by a joint body of the UN Trusteeship Council and the Human Rights Council.

• 50-Year Non-Accession Rule: To prevent future disputes, newly independent states must refrain from joining any neighboring countries for 50 years (e.g., Crimea cannot join Russia).

(3) Adjustment of Kaliningrad Oblast

• As a political counterbalance, allow Russia’s westernmost region, Kaliningrad (formerly Königsberg), to become a new sovereign state, such as the “Republic of Königsberg,” under similar international supervision, while maintaining neutrality.

(4) Concessions to Russia from the International Community

• The international community will waive war crime charges against Russian leaders and lift freezes on Russia’s foreign reserves, facilitating Russia’s economic recovery and development.

1. Establish International Oversight and Guarantee Mechanisms

• Revitalizing the Trusteeship Council: Reactivate the UN Trusteeship Council and merge it with the Human Rights Council to oversee referenda and the neutrality mechanisms, ultimately renaming it the "Global Symbiosis Council" (UN Global Symbiosis Council).

• Transparent Technological Support: Use AI and blockchain to ensure transparency and credibility in oversight and implementation processes.

1. Encourage the “Small is Beautiful” Model

Learn from the successful examples of Switzerland, Belgium, and Singapore to promote the establishment of small, independent states in multicultural regions, enhancing regional stability and development.

1. Develop a "Global Symbiosis Charter"

Draft an international charter based on the philosophy of intersubjective symbiosis to regulate relationships among nations, communities, and individuals, providing institutional safeguards for global peace and cooperation.

Expected Outcomes

1. Achieve Peace in Conflict Zones: End current wars and ensure regional stability through the proposed measures.

2. Establish a New International Relations Model: Build a new security framework centered on intersubjective symbiosis to reduce conflicts and promote cooperation.

3. Construct a Real-Time Regulation Mechanism for Symbiotic Networks:

• Dynamically evaluate behaviors across multiple dimensions such as truth-falsehood, good-evil, beauty-ugliness, wisdom-foolishness, and divine-demonic, forming a real-time regulatory system.

• Encourage constructive behaviors while suppressing destructive actions, enabling self-regulation on a global scale.

Conclusion

The core of Ending Wars, Rebuilding a New Global Peace Order lies in the innovative "Third Path." By combining high-threshold independence with robust international oversight mechanisms, this approach strikes a balance between sovereignty and human rights, ensuring peace and stability. Simultaneously, the Global Symbiosis Charter and the Global Symbiosis Council provide a sustainable framework for long-term international collaboration.

This proposal not only paves the way to end the Russia-Ukraine War but also renders any attempts at global domination by empires, alliances, or axis powers factually impossible. It marks a new chapter for humanity, leading us toward peace and symbiosis on a global scale.