怎么办？美国总统遭遇了一个哈姆雷特王子式的问题！

By Archer Hong Qian

看看这张集合图，川普因“慕尼黑安全会”上万斯刺激欧洲自强的发声，以及《乌美矿产协议》促和思路引发各种纠葛，惹的身为盟友却一面正义凛然大会小会支持乌克兰，一面继续给俄罗斯输血的欧洲，骂成了筛子。

这的确是这个时代的，川普遭遇的一个哈姆雷特式的问题！

怎么办？从这个问题出发，川普总统除了愿意被泽连斯基绑定同时对美国选民有个交待，签下《乌美矿产协议》之外，更应该与欧洲盟友签一个既解决盟友能源刚需，有起到对俄乌战争釜底抽薪作用的《欧美石化协议》，全面开放石油天然气生产供应，还能解决大量就业，平抑贸易逆差，获得数千亿美元收入，这大笔钱，可以对内投资新兴产业，对外援助乌克兰、以色列和印太地区⋯⋯川普的MAGA运动就全盘皆活游刃有余了！

总之，川普的MAGA运动在当前局势中的核心挑战，是如何在确保美国利益与全球责任之间取得动态平衡。

面对欧洲在俄乌战争中的矛盾行为，川普通过《乌美矿产协议》为美国和乌克兰建立实质性利益联系，但要真正釜底抽薪，结束俄乌战争，实现公正而持久和平，还需与欧洲签订《欧美石化协议》，开放石油天然气生产供应。这不仅缓解欧洲对俄能源依赖，还能促进美国就业、平衡贸易逆差、关税大棒适可而止，并为国内建设与全球安全援助提供充足资金，从而实现MAGA战略的全面活跃与有效推进。

2025.3.8夜Vancouver

What to do? The President of the United States is facing a Hamlet-like dilemma!

Look at this visual representation — Trump, due to J.D. Vance’s call for European self-reliance at the Munich Security Conference and the US-Ukraine Mineral Agreement’s peace-promoting approach, has triggered various entanglements. This has led Europe — while grandly supporting Ukraine in public — to continue financially supporting Russia, drawing heavy criticism despite being allies.

This is indeed a Hamlet-like question of our time, one Trump must face!

The President of the United States is facing a Hamlet-like dilemma, torn between profound internal conflicts, difficult decisions, and moral choices.

• "To be or not to be?" – Perhaps the president is facing a life-or-death political crisis, such as war, economic collapse, or the threat of impeachment.

• The dilemma of revenge and justice – Maybe the president must decide whether to take harsh action against a country, individual, or political party but fears the consequences could backfire.

• "Overthinking leads to inaction" – Just as Hamlet delays action due to excessive contemplation, is the president also paralyzed by overanalyzing the situation?

• Betrayal and conspiracy among allies – If the president has been deceived by advisors, party members, or international allies, he could be trapped in a Hamlet-like tragedy.

What to do? Beyond being tied to Zelensky and addressing American voters by signing the US-Ukraine Mineral Agreement, Trump should also sign a US-Europe Petrochemical Agreement. This would address Europe’s energy needs, cut off Russia’s funding for the war, open US oil and gas production, create jobs, reduce trade deficits, and generate billions in revenue. These funds could fuel domestic emerging industries and support Ukraine, Israel, and the Indo-Pacific — making Trump’s MAGA movement far more effective and adaptable.

Ultimately, the core challenge for Trump’s MAGA movement in the current situation is how to strike a dynamic balance between safeguarding US interests and fulfilling global responsibilities.

Faced with Europe’s contradictory behavior in the Russia-Ukraine war, Trump’s US-Ukraine Mineral Agreement creates substantial mutual interests between the US and Ukraine. But to truly end the war and achieve lasting peace, the US-Europe Petrochemical Agreement is needed. It would ease Europe’s dependence on Russian energy, boost US employment, balance trade deficits, and provide ample resources for domestic development and international aid — enabling the full and effective implementation of the MAGA strategy.

Archer Hong Qian
March 8, 2025, Vancouver