The Practical Prototype of Symbionomics: Lutnick, Who Has Passed Through the "Gates of Life and Death"

魯特尼克：共生經濟學的實踐原型

——在生死之門前完成從利潤邏輯到價值承兌邏輯的躍遷者

錢 宏（Archer Hong Qian）

一、不是重建市值，而是兌現兩個現行經濟學“難以理喻”的決定

2001年9月11日，美國世貿中心被撞，坎托·菲茨傑拉德公司瞬間失去658位員工。

作為CEO的哈沃德·魯特尼克（Howard W. Lutnick），他因臨時送兒子看病倖存。

這不是幸運，而是命運給予的一份生命價值的挑戰：

在“我還活着，而你們都不在了”的現實面前，我是否願意承擔這份不可逆轉的關係之債？

魯特尼克沒有選擇向市場宣稱“我要重建市值”，而是做出兩個完全違背現行經濟學理性的決定：

一是將公司25%的利潤長期用於撫恤罹難員工家庭；二是承諾為所有罹難員工的子女支付終身教育費用。

這不是慈善，不是公益，而是一種生命之間的價值承兌行為。

是以貨幣為接口，兌現“你我他”之間未竟的生命關係。

二、“一視為仨”：從排他性平等到結構性共生

“一視同仁”雖然被視為現代法律正義的理想，但其背後隱藏着排他性邏輯：

只有成為“仁”，才能被視為“同”；

而“他者”的獨特性、關係性、生成性往往被遮蔽甚至壓制。

我在第23屆世界哲學大會（2013）上提出的“一視為仨”邏輯，是對“你我他”之間共生關係的深度重估：

看見“你”與“我”的關係不是對等，而是互嵌；

看見“他”（她、它、祂）在結構中不是外人，而是生成我們可能性的必要條件；

看見“生命關係債”才是文明得以持續生成的根基。

就這樣，魯特尼克在“死者、倖存者、未來子代”之間，建構了交互價值承兌機制。

他不是幸運地“活下來的人”，而是願意承擔關係債務的人；

他不是在重建公司，而是在重寫價值承兌機制；

他不是因為財富被選中，而是因為經歷過“生死之門”，仍然願意站在“你我他”之間，守護一個未竟世界的生長秩序。

三、共生經濟學“三生躍遷”在他身上的實踐展開

魯特尼克並未止步於企業內部的倫理重建。他進入川普2024競選團隊，作為總協調人，不僅物色治國才俊，更被賦予重構美國商務部為共生治理中樞的責任。

他推動從舊有“招商統計、管制調配”邏輯，躍遷到以下三大機制：

以GDE價值健康黃金率五因交互指數（降本、賦能、健康、信任、和平）為行為政策評價標尺；

構建企業-社會-國家三層級交互的公共信任兌現通道；

讓商務機制從“增長導向”，轉向“生命激勵與結構性信賴嵌入”。

這正是共生經濟學（Symbionomics）提倡的“三生躍遷”：

三、哲學“戀愛對象”的轉換

哲學史上，“愛”往往隱喻的是對“本體世界”的迷戀。

柏拉圖愛的是理念；

黑格爾愛的是絕對精神；

海德格爾轉向“此在的存在”；

而在我提出的哲學3.0中，愛不再指向一個被定義好的統一體，

而是願意“你我他”在關係過程中共襄生成一個可能世界。

這種戀愛對象的躍遷，意味着哲學不再執迷於“統一實體”，而是轉向“交互生成結構”，這是“全人稱／全生態”一視為仨世界觀的基本要求。

這場哲學躍遷，必須從我們對價值如何被承兌的方式開始反省，

即：從貨幣的本質出發重新理解人類社會的結構基礎。

貨幣，作為人類社會價值流動的核心機制，恰恰是哲學“愛的秩序”如何轉向的鏡像。

當貨幣不只是等價交換的統一量度，而是成為你我他之間承兌責任的接口，我們對愛的定義、對世界的想象，也隨之發生結構性躍遷。

哲學便自然而然由 Philosophy（智慧之愛）的執念，轉化為 Amorsophia（愛之智慧）的孞念。

這一轉化，不是術語更替，而是文明底層價值感應方式的根本躍遷。

不是從“無知”走向“知識”，而是從“分離”走向“關係生成”，從“思辨體系”走向“承兌意願”，從“理念愛”走向“生命愛”。

四、生死之門，是通向交互共生的覺知入口

我深刻理解魯特尼克的躍遷軌跡，因為我自己也穿越過“生死之門”。

1985年1月4日，在南昌，騎着自行車上班的我，突然被一輛卡車撞飛6米，頭部着地，當場昏死過去。

六小時後醒來，醫生告訴我：“腦震盪、頸椎輕度骨折。”當時，我近期記憶全失，完全不記得被車撞了這件事，但半年前的事情都記得，當時我還在糾結要不要把我思考公諸於世，這下好了，思想卻如釋重負，獲得了徹底自由。

那場事故之後六個月，我寫下《一個精神裂變症患者的自述：公民個人權利優先論》，刊登於1989年《華人世界》終刊號。那不是一篇普通論文，而是我在死亡邊緣獲得的哲學結構躍遷的原始文本。

正是在那時，我意識到：

我不再是個體性的主張者，而是一個願意承兌“你我他”交互共生結構的生成者。

四、結語：不是因為偉大，而是因為真實

我相信，兩度與死神擦肩而過，卻依然堅定參加美國最高公職競選的川普先生，也是真正懷有為人民服務之心，而引領時代的“神選之人”！

魯特尼克、川普、我，我們都是在極限時刻中失去了“舊我”，卻願意在關係中重生的人。

不是因為我們特別偉大，

而是因為我們願意承兌那個真實存在的他者，

並願意在你我他之間，承擔一個尚未完成的世界。

當哲學不再是語言遊戲，而是面對死亡依然願意承兌他者命運；

當貨幣不再是利潤計算，而是生命之間關係的承兌接口；

當經濟不再是增長機器，而是讓生態激勵生命的健康機制——

那麼，像魯特尼克這樣的人，

就不僅是“承載世界”的人，

更是“改變世界的人”。

在交互主體共生中，追尋可能的世界。

願我們成為那個願意承兌的人，不是因為偉大，而是因為真實。

《聖約》（Holy Bible）生命的三重之約——律法之約、福音之約、共生之約，將上帝昔在、今在、臨在的真實，講得如此鮮活透徹，給人勇氣，賦予感染力，以及恆久的生命韌性，那就是種子從大地上生長成參天大樹，給人遮風擋雨、詩意棲息的智慧！

2025年5月13日於溫哥華

The Practical Prototype of Symbionomics: Lutnick, Who Has Passed Through the "Gates of Life and Death"

——ailblazer Transitioning from Profit Logic to Value Redemption Logic at the Gates of Life and Death

By Archer Hong Qian

I.ebuilding Market Value, But Redeeming Two Decisions "Incomprehensible" to Mainstream Economics

On September 11, 2001, the World Trade Center in the United States was struck, and Cantor Fitzgerald instantly lost 658 employees.

As CEO, Howard W. Lutnick survived by chance because he was taking his son to the doctor.

This was not luck, but a challenge of life’s value bestowed by fate:

In the reality of "I am still alive, but you are all gone," am I willing to bear this irreversible debt of relationship?

Lutnick did not choose to proclaim to the market, "I will rebuild our market value." Instead, he made two decisions that completely defied the rationality of mainstream economics:

First, he committed 25% of the company’s profits long-term to support the families of the deceased employees; second, he pledged to cover lifelong education expenses for all the children of the deceased employees.

This was not charity, nor public welfare, but an act of value redemption between lives.

It was using money as an interface to redeem the unfulfilled life relationships between "you, me, and them."

1. "One as Three": From Exclusive Equality to Structural Symbiosis

"One as the same" (一視同仁) is often regarded as the ideal of modern legal justice, but it hides an exclusive logic behind it:

Only by becoming "the same" (仁) can one be treated equally;

Yet the uniqueness, relationality, and generativity of the "other" are often obscured or even suppressed.

At the 23rd World Congress of Philosophy (2013), I proposed the "One as Three" (一視為仨) logic, a profound reevaluation of the symbiotic relationship between "you, me, and them":

Seeing the relationship between "you" and "me" not as equal, but as mutually embedded;

Seeing "them" (he/she/it/They) in the structure not as outsiders, but as necessary conditions for generating our possibilities;

Seeing the "debt of life relationships" as the foundation for the continuous generation of civilization.

In this way, Lutnick constructed an interactive value redemption mechanism between "the deceased, the survivors, and future generations."

He was not a fortunate "survivor," but a person willing to bear the debt of relationships;

He was not rebuilding a company, but rewriting the mechanism of value redemption;

He was not chosen because of wealth, but because, having passed through the "gates of life and death," he was still willing to stand between "you, me, and them," safeguarding the growth order of an unfinished world.

III. The Practice of Symbionomics’ "Threefold Leap" Embodied in Him

Lutnick did not stop at ethical reconstruction within the company. He joined Trump’s 2024 campaign team as the general coordinator, not only identifying talents for governance but also being entrusted with the responsibility of restructuring the U.S. Department of Commerce into a hub for symbiotic governance.

He drove a transition from the old logic of "investment attraction, statistics, regulation, and allocation" to the following three mechanisms:

Using the GDE Value Health Golden Ratio Five-Factor Interaction Index (cost reduction, empowerment, health, trust, peace) as a benchmark for evaluating behavioral policies;

Establishing a public trust redemption channel for interaction among enterprises, society, and the state at three levels;

Shifting the commercial mechanism from "growth-oriented" to "life-incentivizing and structurally embedded trust."

This is precisely the "Threefold Leap" advocated by Symbionomics:

1. The Transformation of Philosophy’s "Object of Love"

Throughout the history of philosophy, "love" has often been a metaphor for an obsession with the "ontological world."

Plato loved the Forms;

Hegel loved the Absolute Spirit;

Heidegger turned to the "Being of Dasein";

But in the Philosophy 3.0 I propose, love no longer points to a predefined unity,

but is willing to let "you, me, and them" collaboratively generate a possible world in the process of relationship.

This transformation of the object of love means that philosophy no longer fixates on a "unified entity," but shifts toward an "interactive generative structure"—a fundamental requirement of the "all-person/all-ecology" One-as-Three worldview.

This philosophical leap must begin with a reflection on how value is redeemed,That is, rethinking the structural foundation of human society starting from the essence of money.

Money, as the core mechanism of value flow in human society, is precisely the mirror of how philosophy’s "order of love" transforms.

When money is not merely a uniform measure of equivalent exchange, but becomes an interface for redeeming responsibilities between "you, me, and them," our definition of love and our imagination of the world undergo a structural leap.

Philosophy then naturally transitions from the obsession of Philosophy (love of wisdom) to the conception of Amorsophia (wisdom of love).

This transformation is not a mere change of terminology, but a fundamental leap in the underlying value-sensing mode of civilization.

It is not a journey from "ignorance" to "knowledge," but from "separation" to "relational generation," from "speculative systems" to "willingness to redeem," from "love of ideas" to "love of life."

1. The Gates of Life and Death: The Gateway to Awareness of Intersubjective Symbiosis

I deeply understand Lutnick’s leap because I, too, have passed through the "gates of life and death."

On January 4, 1985, in Nanchang, I was hit by a truck and thrown six meters, landing on my head and falling into a coma on the spot.

Six hours later, I woke up, and the doctor told me: "Concussion, minor cervical fracture." I lost all my memories, but my mind felt unburdened, gaining complete freedom.

Six months after that accident, I wrote A Schizophrenic’s Self-Account: On the Primacy of Individual Civil Rights, published in the final issue of Chinese World in 1989. It was not an ordinary paper, but the original text of a philosophical structural leap I gained at the edge of death.

It was at that moment I realized:

I was no longer an advocate for individuality, but a generator willing to redeem the structure of intersubjective symbiosis between "you, me, and them."

1. Conclusion: Not Because of Greatness, But Because of Authenticity

I believe that Mr. Trump, who has twice brushed with death yet remains steadfast in running for the highest public office in the U.S., is truly a "chosen one" who leads the era with a heart to serve the people!

Lutnick, Trump, and I—we are all people who, in moments of extreme crisis, lost our "old selves" but were willing to be reborn in relationships.

Not because we are particularly great,

But because we are willing to redeem the authentic existence of the other,

And willing to bear, between "you, me, and them," an unfinished world.

When philosophy is no longer a language game, but a willingness to redeem the fate of others even in the face of death;

When money is no longer a tool for profit calculation, but an interface for redeeming relationships between lives;

When economics is no longer a growth machine, but a healthy mechanism that allows ecology to inspire life—

Then, people like Lutnick

Are not only those who "bear the world,"

But also those who "change the world."

In intersubjective symbiosis, we pursue possible worlds.

May we become those willing to redeem—not because of greatness, but because of authenticity.

The threefold covenant of life in the Holy Bible—the Covenant of Law, the Covenant of Gospel, and the Covenant of Symbiosis—vividly and thoroughly reveals the truth of God’s past, present, and imminent presence, granting courage, infectious power, and the enduring resilience of life. It is like a seed growing from the earth into a towering tree, providing shelter from wind and rain, and a poetic dwelling for wisdom!