三重壟斷與操縱：全能國家的前提與困境

The Three Monopolies and Manipulations: The Premise and Predicament of an Omnipotent State

錢 宏Archer Hong Qian

2025.11.8晨於Singapore途中

如果美國的馬姆達尼-桑德斯們理解和鼓吹的社會主義（包括強制共產主義、國家社會主義、特色社會主義或穆斯林社會主義、乃至民主社會主義），也是全能政府-舉國體制，那麼：

全能政府的前提條件，是實行“三壟斷-三操縱”：

首先，壟斷-操縱真理的意識形態制度——即以話術-謊言替代邏輯思行自由，阻斷生命自組織連接動態平衡的交互主體共生

其次，壟斷-操縱權力的政治法律制度——即以黨團社群取代警察、司法、立法

最後，壟斷-操縱資源與經濟利益的經濟制度——即以劫富濟貧-政府供應取代勞動分工-市場秩序

然而，三壟斷-操縱必然扼殺國民、社會、政府三大自組織交互作用生機，致使全能政府-舉國體制，陷入顧此失彼的混亂失序，結果必然是“成也壟斷-操縱，敗也壟斷-操縱”——成的是，結黨營私的官僚機會主義者，殖官主義盛行；敗的是，誠實工作的社會建設主義者，讓全能政府無以為繼！

當然，除非有“制度外部性”供應、供養這個全能政府-舉國體制，比如體制外給予“最惠國待遇”（GSP非對等交互普惠制）條件下的“世界貿易組織”（WTO）——“特利芬-羅德里克三元難題”條件下的經濟全球化（始於二戰後至21世紀初的全球化2.0，Archer），可以續其命，甚至輝煌一時。

但是，即便如此，也不是長久之計，再富有的“最惠國待遇”輸出者，在“特利芬-羅德里克三元難題”條件下，都不可能長期失血，危及自身（國民待遇）機體健康。

這些主權在民的國家（如美國、歐盟、英國、加拿大、土耳其、烏克蘭、列支敦士登），他們終究會反思質疑“憑什麼呀？”並訴諸“武力”強行或理性糾偏（如取消GSP，加征關稅，甚至“脫鈎斷鏈”）。這樣一來，“橫空出世”的川普、山普、江普、海普們，必會打碎經濟全球化2.0，或“富裕導向民主”話術包裝下掩蓋的不公平、不對等幻象——“全球自由貿易”的神話！

否則，他們自己也難以為繼，受惠者也未必感謝反而會自我膨脹，而斷了制度外部性供養的“全能舉國體制”自然而然會陷入“內卷”和得而復失（續而復死）的“溫家寶難題”（2012）終局！

所以，雖然美國的馬姆達尼-桑德斯們的言行，一看就是個失敗的社會主義打小抄的笑話，但他們居然能通過“競選”獲得美國最大城市紐約（人口830多萬、都會區的GDP超過2萬億美元）的執政機會，那就只能承認事實，讓美國人民也嘗試一下“全能政府三重壟斷-操縱”的厲害，也讓美國立國250年以來的“犯錯-糾錯”機制，再經受一次關乎“We the People”切身利益的嚴峻考驗吧！

參看：

1、《一切就此開始：高超的政治話術，透露狡黠的愚蠢》 http://symbiosism.com.cn/11116.html

2、《曼達尼是“民主社會主義”者？搞笑了吧？》
http://symbiosism.com.cn/11108.html
https://blog.creaders.net/user_blog_diary.php?did=NTMwNzEz

3、Archer Hong Qian：最簡明的全球化三段論 http://symbiosism.com.cn/9985.html

The Three Monopolies and Manipulations: The Premise and Predicament of an Omnipotent State（三種壟斷與操縱：全能國家的前提與困境）

By Archer Hong Qian

On the way to Singapore, November 8, 2025, in the morning.

The Three Monopolies and Manipulations: The Premise and Predicament of an Omnipotent State
Archer Hong Qian
Morning of November 8, 2025 · En route to Singapore

If the socialism understood and promoted by America’s Mamdani–Sanders faction (including coercive communism, national socialism, socialism with national characteristics or Muslim socialism, and even democratic socialism) is also a totalitarian government–whole-nation system, then:

The precondition for a totalitarian government is the implementation of the “Three Monopolies – Three Manipulations”:

First, the monopoly and manipulation of truth through an ideological system—namely, replacing the freedom of logical thinking and acting with rhetoric and lies, thereby blocking the intersubjective symbiosis in which life self-organizes to connect dynamic balance.

Second, the monopoly and manipulation of power through a political–legal system—namely, replacing the police, judiciary, and legislature with party, factional, and collective organizations.

Finally, the monopoly and manipulation of resources and economic interests through an economic system—namely, replacing the division of labor and market order with redistribution and government provisioning under the slogan of “robbing the rich to help the poor.”

However, the three monopolies and manipulations will inevitably stifle the vitality of the three great self-organizing interactions among the people, society, and the state, causing the totalitarian government–whole-nation system to fall into unmanageable disorder and confusion. The result is bound to be: “Success by monopoly–manipulation, failure by monopoly–manipulation.” What succeeds is the bureaucratic opportunists who form cliques for private gain—colonial officialism flourishes; what fails is the honest social constructionists, leaving the totalitarian state unable to sustain itself.

Of course, unless there is “institutional externality” that supplies and sustains this totalitarian government–whole-nation system. For example, the “Most-Favored-Nation” (MFN, a Generalized System of Preferences of unequal reciprocity) granted by external systems under the “World Trade Organization” (WTO)—the economic globalization conditioned by the “Triffin–Rodrik Trilemma” (beginning after WWII and lasting into the early 21st century, known as Globalization 2.0)—can extend its life, even allowing it to flourish for a time.

Yet even so, it is not a long-term solution. No matter how wealthy the provider of “Most-Favored-Nation” treatment may be, under the “Triffin–Rodrik Trilemma,” it cannot continue losing blood indefinitely without endangering its own national (citizen welfare) organism.

These countries where sovereignty rests with the people (such as the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, Turkey, Ukraine, Liechtenstein)—they will eventually reflect and ask, “Why should we?” and resort to forceful or rational correction (such as canceling GSP, raising tariffs, or even “decoupling and severing supply chains”). As a result, the sudden rise of figures like Trump, Milei, and other “Pop”-type leaders will inevitably shatter the illusions of Globalization 2.0, or the myth of “global free trade” concealed under the rhetoric of “prosperity-driven democracy”—a system built on unfair and unequal terms.

Otherwise, the provider countries themselves will be unable to sustain it, and the beneficiaries may not even be grateful—instead becoming self-inflated. Once cut off from institutional externalities, the totalitarian whole-nation system will naturally fall into “involution” and the cycle of “gain and loss again” (prolongation followed by collapse), resulting in what is known as the “Wen Jiabao Dilemma” (2012) endgame.

Therefore, although the words and actions of America’s Mamdani–Sanders faction may seem like a laughable copy-and-paste of failed socialism, the fact that they have managed to gain governing power through “elections” in the largest U.S. city, New York (with more than 8.3 million residents and a metropolitan GDP exceeding $2 trillion), means we must accept reality: let the American people also experience the severity of the “Three Monopolies – Three Manipulations” of a totalitarian government. And let the United States’ 250-year-old mechanism of “making mistakes and correcting mistakes” once again undergo a severe test—one that touches the vital interests of “We the People.”