第五和平方略：五項基本原則、十一條和平框架

The Fifth Peace Strategy: Five Fundamental Principles and Eleven Peace Frameworks

——交互主體共生基金會（加拿大聯邦）倡議

Initiative by the Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation (Federally Registered Non-Profit in Canada)

引言：從消耗共死，到覺悟共生

從自然法的視角，人類戰爭是一種特殊的生態戰爭。尤其是熱兵器時代，人類的生態戰爭，一旦開打，就沒有人可以“叫停戰爭”，總是開打容易（往往是一念之間），結束難（不可收拾）。

人類戰爭，尤其是現代戰爭的止戰方式，只有五種：1、徹底勝負方式；2、打打談談方式；3、以打促談方式；4、同歸於盡方式；5、覺悟共生方式。

 這裡只說第五種方式。戰爭久拖不決，參戰方都難以取勝，都深感“疲憊不堪”，到了各方面可承受的極限，突然發現：戰爭，其實一開始就非必要，而完全是某些觀念作祟和誤判，導致一場曠日持久的生靈塗炭，大家翻轉極限，覺悟後坐下來“議和”，最典型的例子，就是三十年戰爭（1618－1648），議出了一個奠定此後“主權（民族）國家”世界秩序的《威斯特伐利亞和約》。

 這就是“交互主體共生”哲學的最鮮明案例！那麼，我要說的是：俄烏“三年戰爭”的終結方式，有沒有仿效覺悟共生的“議和”方式，從而結出一個“化解衝突重建世界新秩序”的歷史性新成果呢？

本方案提出第五種止戰方式——覺悟共生：在“生命自組織連接動態平衡”的交互主體共生（Intersubjective Symbiosis）哲學指引下，通過五項基本原則與十一條和平框架，實現從“荼毒生命，毀滅文明”到“共生新生”的歷史性轉折。

五項基本原則、十一條和平框架

五項基本原則

Ⅰ、烏克蘭作為一個有效治理的主權獨立國家，其國家地位不可動搖、不可剝奪；

Ⅱ、生命安全優先於領土幻覺，人的尊嚴高於任何歷史敘事和利益訴求；

Ⅲ、“小即是美”的多元獨立共生體制，是中東歐與俄羅斯緩衝區與未來世界和平的共生法則；

Ⅳ、俄羅斯的“安全感”應被納入共生協商機制，但不得以毀滅本國人民和他國存在為代價；

Ⅴ、歐美不以徹底摧毀俄羅斯，而以“技術—經濟繁榮—人文共生網絡”引導其脫離帝國思維，重新融入全球文明秩序。

十一條和平框架

Ⅰ、實現50天內停火，100天內完成俄烏雙方有序撤出烏東與庫爾斯克地區，建立和談平台；

Ⅱ、和平談判由烏克蘭與俄羅斯主談，歐盟、英國參與，美國主導主持；

Ⅲ、烏東四州（頓涅茨克、盧甘斯克、扎波羅熱、赫爾松）在全民公投、國際監督下，建立“小即是美”原則下的獨立國家，脫離雙方控制，採取中立政策；

Ⅳ、加里寧格勒州在區域公投下轉型為“柯尼斯堡共和國”，不再受俄聯邦直接控制；

Ⅴ、克里米亞維持現狀由俄羅斯託管，但國際承認其原則上為“獨立待定”，由未來烏俄共商解決主權歸屬；

Ⅵ、俄羅斯須歸還在戰爭中擄走的所有烏克蘭兒童、平民及其財物資產；

Ⅶ、歐洲設立聯合維和部隊，由英國與歐盟共同領導，派駐至烏東四州與柯尼斯堡地區，監督其安全建國進程；

Ⅷ、確立烏克蘭中、西部“東儀天主教”文化與烏克蘭民族傳統基礎，俄羅斯及國際社會承認，以基輔為首都，領土完整主權獨立的“新烏克蘭”共和國；

Ⅸ、俄羅斯用於戰爭所被凍結資產一部分將以戰後重建資金形式補償新烏克蘭，歐美同時取消對俄羅斯的全面經濟制裁；

Ⅹ、新烏克蘭共和國是否加入歐盟與北約為其主權選擇，俄羅斯不得干預，同時，歐盟與北約對俄羅斯開放談判大門；

Ⅺ、和平協議簽署，邀請以下7國作為地緣安全共生體見證人：白俄羅斯、波蘭、立陶宛、芬蘭、羅馬尼亞、摩爾多瓦、土耳其。

必要性分析：從零和消耗到共生再平衡

戰爭已非“誰贏誰輸”，而是生態浩劫：俄羅斯能源收入暴跌、預算赤字飆升，難以支撐烏東重建（成本超2000億美元）；烏克蘭人力短缺、基礎設施崩壞；全球糧食/芯片危機加劇。現有方案雖促停火，卻陷領土僵局，無法從根源化解帝國邏輯與主客二元對立的互害循環。

本方案的必要性在於：以生命尊嚴為優先，通過“小即是美”緩衝網絡，同步修復雙方結構性失衡——俄羅斯卸帝國包袱，避免內爆；烏克蘭保中西部新生，換取長期安全；歐美獲穩定緩衝，避免北約直接對撞。方案整合安全保障、經濟解凍與文明轉譯，實現“覺悟共生”的第五種止戰方式，優先生命而非領土，符合自然法與歷史規律（如威斯特伐利亞和約的緩衝區設計）。

可行性分析：共識最大化、風險最小化

方案整合三方核心訴求：

• 烏克蘭獲中西部主權完整、公投保障、歐盟/北約自選；

• 俄羅斯獲克里米亞託管、飛地自治、安全感納入協商；

• 歐美獲停火、制裁漸解、緩衝區穩定，避免長期消耗。

民意基礎厚：烏克蘭68%支持現狀，俄羅斯74%厭戰（2025民調）。國際中立（如瑞士模式）易操作，AI監督透明，歷史先例（如威斯特伐利亞）證明成功率高。

風險低：若一方拒停火，三支點（能源/AI/經濟）可促極限翻轉；公投擔保中立，化解領土焦慮。

實際操作步驟：分三階段，90天落地

總時長90天，預算<500億美元（凍資+歐盟捐），基金會提供免費AI-TRUST平台監督。

階段1: 停火啟動（0-30天）

• 立即啟動，美主談。

• 俄烏有序撤烏東/庫爾斯克，能源互停，返還烏兒童/資產。

• 歐盟/英維和部隊+AI無人機監測。

• 輸出：全面停火宣言，戰場緩衝。

階段2: 緩衝孵化（31-60天）

• 烏俄主談，歐盟/英參與。

• 烏東四州公投獨立中立國，加里寧格勒→柯尼斯堡共和國，克里米亞“獨立待定”。

• 國際監督+AI公投平台（區塊鏈透明）。

• 輸出：5新實體成立，新烏克蘭中西部主權確認。

階段3: 共生重建（61-90天）

• 美主導，全球見證。

• 凍資補償重建，制裁漸解，歐盟/北約對俄開放。

• AI-TRUST療愈創傷、治理透明。

• 輸出：《俄烏共生協約》簽署，全球共生公約雛形。

風險管理：

若俄拒停火，三支點激活（烏克蘭能源/AI/經濟反制）；烏克蘭若憂公投，基金會擔保中立（芬蘭式韌性）。基金會願任中立方，提供免費AI工具。

此方案非終點，而是起點：從俄烏“覺悟共生”，輻射全球——生命高於領土，主權在民，主體共生，讓任何統治全世界的帝國政治企圖成為事實上的不可能（康德《論永久和平》），最終促成《全球共生公約》的制定。

Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation (Canada Federal Registration: 1483624-1)

Archer Hong Qian，基金會註冊人

Vancouver, December 11, 2025

聯繫方式： hongguanworld@gmail.com | +1 604 690 6088

The Fifth Peace Strategy: Five Fundamental Principles and Eleven Peace Frameworks

Initiative by the Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation (Federally Registered Non-Profit in Canada)

第五和平方略：五項基本原則、十一條和平框架

Introduction: From Mutual Destruction to Symbiotic Awakening

From the perspective of natural law, human warfare is a special form of ecological war.
Especially in the era of hot weapons, once human ecological war begins, no one can “stop” it.
It is always easy to start (often just a moment of impulse) but extremely difficult to end.

Modern wars end in five ways:

1. Complete victory/defeat

2. Fighting and negotiating simultaneously

3. Using military pressure to force negotiations

4. Mutual destruction

5. Awakened Symbiosis

This proposal focuses on the fifth mode.

When a war drags on, neither side can win, both are exhausted, and all parties reach the breaking point. Suddenly they realize: the war was unnecessary from the beginning—merely a result of misguided ideas and misjudgments. Upon awakening, they sit down to negotiate. The most typical example is the Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648), which produced the Peace of Westphalia, establishing the sovereign-state world order.

This is the clearest historical example of Intersubjective Symbiosism in action.

The question, then, is:

Can the Russia–Ukraine war end through a similar “awakening-symbiosis negotiation,” producing a historically transformative solution that both ends the conflict and rebuilds a new global order?

This proposal presents the fifth mode of war-termination—Awakened Symbiosis:
guided by the philosophy of Intersubjective Symbiosis and grounded in “life’s self-organizing dynamic balance,” we implement Five Fundamental Principles and Eleven Peace Frameworks to achieve a historic shift from “destroying life and civilization” to “symbiotic renewal.”

Five Fundamental Principles

Ⅰ. Ukraine is a sovereign, independently governed state, and its national status is immovable and inalienable.

Ⅱ. Life-security takes precedence over territorial illusions; human dignity stands above all historical narratives or interest claims.

Ⅲ. The principle “Small Is Beautiful”—a system of diverse, independent, coexisting polities—shall serve as the symbiotic law for the buffer zone between Central/Eastern Europe and Russia, and for future world peace.

Ⅳ. Russia’s need for “security reassurance” should be incorporated into a symbiotic consultation mechanism, but never at the cost of destroying its own people or another sovereign nation.

Ⅴ. Europe and the United States shall not seek the total destruction of Russia, but shall guide it out of imperial thinking—through technological transition, economic revitalization, and cultural-symbiosis networks—so it may reintegrate into global civilization.

Eleven Peace Frameworks

Ⅰ. Achieve a ceasefire within 50 days, complete orderly withdrawal of Russian and Ukrainian forces from Eastern Ukraine and the Kursk region within 100 days, and establish a negotiation platform.

Ⅱ. Peace talks shall be led by Ukraine and Russia, with the EU and the UK participating, and the United States chairing.

Ⅲ. The four eastern oblasts (Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson) shall, under full international supervision and public referendum, form independent states under the “Small Is Beautiful” principle, adopting neutral status and exiting both sides’ control.

Ⅳ. Kaliningrad shall, through a regional referendum, be transformed into the Republic of Königsberg, no longer directly administered by the Russian Federation.

Ⅴ. Crimea shall maintain its current status under Russian trusteeship, but be internationally recognized as “independent pending determination,” with final sovereignty to be resolved through future bilateral Russia–Ukraine consultations.

Ⅵ. Russia must return all Ukrainian children, civilians, and confiscated properties taken during the war.

Ⅶ. Europe shall establish a Joint Peacekeeping Force, co-led by the UK and the EU, stationed in the four eastern oblasts and in Königsberg to supervise their secure state-building process.

Ⅷ. A new “Republic of Ukraine” shall be reaffirmed—centered on Kyiv—on the basis of Western and Central Ukrainian identity, Eastern-Rite Catholic cultural tradition, and internationally recognized territorial sovereignty.

Ⅸ. A portion of frozen Russian assets shall be used to compensate and rebuild the new Ukraine; simultaneously, Western powers gradually lift comprehensive sanctions on Russia.

Ⅹ. Whether the new Republic of Ukraine joins the EU or NATO is its sovereign choice; Russia may not interfere. Meanwhile, the EU and NATO shall open negotiation doors to Russia.

Ⅺ. Upon signing the peace agreement, seven neighboring countries shall serve as geosecurity symbiosis witnesses: Belarus, Poland, Lithuania, Finland, Romania, Moldova, and Turkey.

Necessity: From Zero-Sum Exhaustion to Symbiotic Rebalancing

War is no longer about who “wins,” but about ecological devastation:

• Russia’s energy income is collapsing; budget deficits are soaring; it cannot afford eastern Ukraine’s reconstruction (costs exceed USD 200 billion).
• Ukraine faces severe demographic loss and infrastructural destruction.
• Global food and semiconductor security is worsening.

Existing proposals can pause the war but cannot resolve the underlying imperial logic or the dualistic subject–object cycle of mutual harm.

The necessity of this proposal lies in prioritizing human dignity, using a “Small Is Beautiful” buffer-network to restore structural balance on both sides:

• Russia sheds imperial burdens, avoiding internal collapse.
• Ukraine preserves a new Western-Central core and gains long-term security.
• Europe and the U.S. gain stability and prevent NATO–Russia direct collision.

It integrates security guarantees, economic thawing, and civilization-translation mechanisms, embodying the “Awakened Symbiosis” mode of war-termination—life above territory, in line with natural law and the Westphalian precedent.

Feasibility: Maximizing Consensus, Minimizing Risk

This proposal aligns the core demands of all three major actors:

• Ukraine gains sovereignty over its Western/Central regions, secure referendums, and free choice regarding EU/NATO.
• Russia obtains Crimea trusteeship, autonomy for its exclave, and its security concerns integrated into negotiation.
• Europe and the U.S. gain ceasefire, sanction relief pathways, and a stable buffer zone that avoids long-term attrition.

Public support is strong:
• 68% of Ukrainians support the current framework;
• 74% of Russians are war-weary (2025 polls).

Neutrality models (e.g., Switzerland) are practical; AI monitoring ensures transparency; and historical precedents (e.g., Westphalia) demonstrate high viability.

Risk is low:
• If one party refuses ceasefire, the “three levers”—energy, AI, and economic pressure—can trigger a structural reversal.
• Referendums guarantee neutrality and dissolve territorial anxiety.

Practical Steps: Three Phases, Completed in 90 Days

Total duration: 90 days
Budget: < USD 50 billion (frozen assets + EU contributions)
The Foundation provides free AI-TRUST oversight.

Phase 1: Ceasefire Activation (Days 0–30)

• Immediate launch of negotiations, chaired by the U.S.
• Russian and Ukrainian forces withdraw from eastern Ukraine and the Kursk region; reciprocal energy freeze; return of Ukrainian children/assets.
• UK–EU peacekeeping forces + AI drones for monitoring.
• Output: Complete ceasefire declaration; stabilization buffer.

Phase 2: Buffer-Zone Incubation (Days 31–60)

• Ukraine–Russia lead talks; EU and UK participate.
• Four eastern oblasts become neutral micro-states; Kaliningrad → Republic of Königsberg; Crimea → “independent pending determination.”
• International supervision + AI referendum platform using blockchain transparency.
• Output: Five new entities established; sovereignty of Western/Central Ukraine affirmed.

Phase 3: Symbiotic Reconstruction (Days 61–90)

• U.S. leads, with global witnesses.
• Frozen assets fund reconstruction; sanctions gradually lifted; EU/NATO pathways open to Russia.
• AI-TRUST used for trauma healing and transparent governance.
• Output: Signing of the Russia–Ukraine Symbiosis Accord, the prototype of a future Global Symbiosis Convention.

Risk Management

If Russia refuses ceasefire, the “three levers” (energy, AI, economic countermeasures) are activated.
If Ukraine worries about referendums, the Foundation guarantees neutrality (Finland-style resilience).
The Foundation commits to serving as a neutral party and providing free AI tools.

This proposal is not an endpoint but a beginning:
starting from Russia–Ukraine “Awakened Symbiosis,” radiating worldwide—
affirming that life is higher than territory, sovereignty resides in the people, and mutual symbiosis makes any imperial ambition to rule the world impossible (as Kant argued in Toward Perpetual Peace).
Ultimately, it points toward the creation of the Global Symbiosis Convention.

Contact: hongguanworld@gmail.com | +1 604 690 6088

Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation (Canada Federal Registration: 1483624-1)

December 11, 2025