沒有人會生下來就成為他人的奴隸” ===〉誰是“他人”？在今天的社會，不是名
稱為“奴隸主”的人，而是擁有金錢和權利的人，今天不只是一部分人成為奴隸，
而是全民皆奴，歡喜快樂地作權奴，錢奴，性奴，物奴。。。。。。
Which do you prefer?
To be a slave who has no control of his life at all or
To be a freeman who have the right to his own destination--- even if some
of them abuse this right. You can chose to be the slave of money/material/sex,
but you can choose not to be that slave too!

“很少女人會成為別人的玩物”==〉今天的文化宣揚的是什麼？媒體宣揚的是什麼？
女人不僅是“別人”的玩物，而是登峰造極到全社會的玩物，是sex objective.
Which do you think you prefer your female friend to be?
To be a sex slave of a slave owner or
to be a free independent lady---although she may have the chance to be polluted by the bad media or environment?

“很少有人敢把戰俘埋入坑裡或釘在十架上”==〉盧旺達及非洲的種族殘殺是什麼？
成千上萬的人被集體不需要任何法律程序的屠殺和活埋是什麼？有一位作者說：請
不要玷污“畜牲”這個詞，因為動物不吃同類。人根本不如禽獸！
Which, in your opinion, that 盧旺達 resembles more, a civilized society
or a uncivilized barbarian society? And did we have any civilized society
3000 years ago?

And can you tell us that 種族殘殺 happened more in the past or more now?
Will people condemn 種族殘殺 in the past (check Joshua in OT and you will
know)? Will they condemn it now?

“每個人都可以說出自己的真正想法, 而不用擔心被放到火上慢慢烤死”==〉如果
“言論自由”已經實現了，“六四”就不會發生，中國的獨立參選人就不會只有500。

You're telling the truth. But do you think there could be any students (or
any people) who dare to protest against corruption (or against any dictator)
and ask for their right to vote 3000 years ago? Did any people think about
that right then?
Or did any one then ever think that they were bore equal then?