設萬維讀者為首頁 廣告服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
簡體 繁體 手機版
分類廣告
版主:奇異恩典
萬維讀者網 > 彩虹之約 > 帖子
網友就美國大選精彩轉貼
送交者: 黑門山 2012年11月30日07:06:45 於 [彩虹之約] 發送悄悄話
網友就美國大選的幾篇精彩轉貼


1)ardmore: [轉載]展望基督教與保守主義 –美國大選後的反思


2)mean: zt:God Elects Obama? by C Michael PattonNovember 7th, 2012 8 Comments


3)mean: zt: Election, Biblically


4)gems: News:Bishops congrat Obama

[轉載]展望基督教與保守主義 –美國大選後的反思
送交者: ardmore 2012年11月29日12:19:23 於 [彩虹之約] 發送悄悄話
 
[轉載]展望基督教與保守主義 –美國大選後的反思


作者:臨風看世界


一人一票的選舉權是很神聖的權利,因為這是選民表明心聲,促成權力交替最重要的手段。它甚至可能是個生命攸關的責任,這次(2012)美國大選,亞利桑那州有位28歲的女子,因為丈夫沒有投票(反對奧巴馬),非常憤怒,開着吉普車從她先生身上輾過去。夫妻因投票反目,這不是第一樁。


大選後的統計數字


這次奧巴馬總統勝選連任,給共和黨人帶來很大的震撼,許多人跌破眼鏡。在失業率高漲、國債高築、人人對經濟前途不甚看好的情況下,現任總統怎麼可能連任?根據選舉當天“出場民調”(exit poll),白人選民有59%選擇羅姆尼,39%選擇奧巴馬。羅姆尼領先20個百分點!白人選民占投票人數的72%,比2008年降了兩個百分點。


美國的非裔選民占13%,其中 93%投奧巴馬,只有6%投羅姆尼。拉丁裔選民占10%(是美國成長最快速的族群),其中71%投奧巴馬,27%投羅姆尼。亞裔只占3%,但有73%投奧巴馬,26%投羅姆尼。可見,族裔與選票的關係密切。


如果以年齡來分,18-29歲(占選民19%)的選民有60%投奧巴馬,37%投羅姆尼。30-44歲(占27%)的選民52%投奧巴馬,45%投羅姆尼。45-64歲(38%)的選民47%投奧巴馬,51%投羅姆尼。65歲以上(16%)的選民44%投奧巴馬,56%投羅姆尼。我們可以明顯看到年齡與選票的關係。


從收入來分,年收入在5萬美元以下的,大多數支持奧巴馬,年收入超過5萬美元的,大多數支持羅姆尼。收入越高,支持羅姆尼的比例越多。(在貧窮線3萬以下的家庭占20%選民人口。52%的選民家庭收入在5萬到20萬之間。)


從宗教信仰來分,信仰各種宗派的新教徒(占選民人口53%)中有42%投奧巴馬,57%投羅姆尼。天主教徒(占選民人口25%)中50%投奧巴馬(拉美裔為主),48%投羅姆尼。猶太教徒(占選民人口2%)中74%投奧巴馬,23%投羅姆尼。其他信仰的人群(包括無宗教信仰)絕大多數支持奧巴馬。


“出場民調”發現,越是固定做禮拜的人群,越是支持羅姆尼。白種福音派投羅姆尼的比率達到79%,白種天主教徒投羅姆尼的也有59%。這意味着,在有宗教信仰的族群間,奧巴馬的支持者多半是非白人,或是青年信徒。這些數字值得玩味。


美國近年來白種人的人口比率下降的趨勢日益明顯,社會貧富差距日益嚴重,社會競爭的遊戲規則使得窮人向上移動的機會越來越小,傳統製造業工作因外包而逐漸萎縮,高科技工人嚴重缺乏,只有服務業一枝獨秀。再加上債台高築,在這樣轉型的現實里,共和黨單靠高舉小政府、縮減聯邦開支、減稅(特別是富人的稅)、放任的自由市場與自由企業、加強國防、加強邊防的理念,已經無法獲得大多數人群的支持。


保守主義的地震?


奧巴馬的勝利,主要依靠青年人、非裔、拉美裔、亞裔、猶太教徒,以及沒有宗教信仰的人。根據皮龍研究中心今年10月的報告,認為自己沒有宗教信仰的美國人(不一定是無神論者)已經達到20%,這是美國人口成長最快的族群!我猜測,其中年輕人可能占大多數。


除了總統大選以外,在參院選舉中民主黨也保持優勢。此外,科羅拉多州竟然通過了大麻合法(雖然在聯邦法律下還是非法)。美國通過同性婚姻合法化的州也增加了幾個。這次選舉不但讓共和黨的“保守主義”遭到滑鐵盧,更暴露了美國人口結構與價值趨向的劇變。


憑良心說,羅姆尼是個道地的“生意人”,希望借着經濟的低迷上位。他並非正牌的保守派,也沒有什麼堅定的政治理念。在受到茶黨牽制的共和黨里,他倒像是個“寄養子”,因緣時會成為唯一有可能當選的總統候選人。


竟選後,除了一批憤怒、失望的人在全國50州發起“脫離聯邦”的情緒化動作以外,許多保守陣營的權威和精英們開始痛定思痛,擔心共和黨在這個人口結構和價值體系急速改變的潮流中被邊緣化。帶着深厚的危機意識,他們紛紛呼籲,要給共和黨重新定位,質疑茶黨那種反對任何“聯邦政府干預”的極端立場。其實,廿世紀幾位最著名的保守主義者:泰德·羅斯福總統、里根總統,以及政論家小威廉·巴克利都比今天的共和黨人更為務實,更不講究意識形態的純潔。


這批共和黨人積極希望重新奪回話語權的主動性,他們認為,當務之急就是:贏得拉美裔的選票(修改移民法);配合年輕人的胃口(注意教育);更多尊重女權,以贏得婦女選票;在經濟政策上,不再採取茶黨那種絕不妥協的態度。這是全民選舉制度的一大優點,沒有黨派願意不顧民意,被對手邊緣化。惟有這樣,政府才有可能成為人民的政府。林肯總統所謂“民有、民治、民享”的理念的確是指導美式民主的一大亮點。


回到保守主義的源頭


我不竟要質問,真正的問題在哪裡?共和黨精英的這些處方是否只是“頭痛醫頭,腳痛醫腳”呢?求變是好的,只有在求變中才有進步的可能。自從里根總統振興共和黨以來,經過小布什總統新保守主義路線徹底的失敗,加上奧巴馬總統兩次擊敗對手,共和黨今天似乎已經走到窮途末路,缺乏創意。可是,求變不能變成一個四不像,對吧?如果失去了基本理念,政黨就沒有生命力,更不要說引發人們的激情和想象力了。


這讓我想到現代“保守主義”的鼻祖,18世紀英國的埃德蒙·伯克。他是英國最偉大的“自由主義”思想家之一。國人對他或許不太熟悉,講到早期的“自由主義”,只聽到“天賦人權”、“人民主權論”,認為西方的“保守主義”就是霸權思想和抱殘守缺的同義字。這個想法是不確的。


在英王喬治三世治下,伯克領先風氣,大力支持美國的獨立革命。後來又獨排眾議,強烈批評法國大革命(請參考拙文《重新思考美國與法國革命的異同》)。並非如《資本論》所批評的,其實伯克在這兩種截然不同的立場間毫無矛盾,反倒是非常一致的。


伯克支持美國的獨立,因為他同情美國“無代表、不納稅”的訴求,認為英王把殖民地的英國後裔看作奴隸。他看出殖民地人民的新教信仰與自由權的訴求緊密相關,是個很好的模式。然而,法國大革命所主張的自由權則是建立在“啟蒙運動”那種抽象的(唯心的?)人權至上、理性至上的前提上。美國憲法保護的不單是國家,更是尊重個人和個人的權利,特別是弱勢者的權利。法國革命是維護國家的權利,甚至大多數人的利益,而不惜犧牲少數人的權利。


伯克的保守主義思想根植於他對人性的基本看法。首先,他承接英國自光榮革命以後尊重“自由權”的傳統。但他認為,純粹從抽象的理性(討論“人類共同”的福祉,而不是真實的個人、家庭、社會組成分子的福祉)作出發點所建立的政治理論,站不住腳,因為那太不實際。非理性的因素(人的個體性)在人的天性中占有極重要的成分,不容忽視。基本上,人是天性脆弱,容易犯錯的。人雖然具備有限的理性思維的能力,卻對複雜的社會問題、政治問題和歷史本身缺乏全面的了解。如果讓人按照不完全的理性在真空裡(沒有傳統的依據,沒有關注實際對象)做判斷、做決策,那是極端危險的。伯克對人性的看法深植於基督教信仰對人性的認知之中,那就是,人性都是有缺陷的,都是自私的、有犯錯的傾向的(原罪)。


“政治應當適合人性,而不僅是適合人的推理。理性只是人性中的一部分,而且不是其中最大的部分。”(伯克)


就是在這個理念下,伯克主張限制英王的權限,支持美國的革命。也就是在這個理念下,他質疑法國大革命人權論的基礎,在革命初期(1790)就預見了暴政的必然。他認為,人類社會和政權必須尊重傳統和歷史所積累的知識和經驗,不論是個人還是群體,都不能任憑衝動和激情所淹沒。近日,海特教授觀察到(《再看人民的眼睛》),人們的所謂理性,往往是為自己(或我群)偏執的激情和利益服務的。伯克在18世紀就意識到了!他深知,人心靈里的“大象”是什麼。


回到美國今天的情形,在這個日漸多元化的社會裡,美國的保守主義如果要重新定位,我認為還應當回到伯克這個起點,也就是認識人性本身的限制,理解那種絕對、放任的自由權(以及今天激進的自由主義)會帶來災害。一個講究自由和民主的政體不能簡單地把理性和自由權絕對化,反倒要尊重傳統,尊重宗教信仰的自由,尊重社會道德和規律,尊重歷史的經驗。


以舊金山為例,一批同性戀者為了伸張自己的自由權,經常裸體在街上行走,完全無視他人良心的道德和尊嚴,這就是自由權的濫用。如果聯邦政府強制宗教團體,雇用人的條件要符合世俗的法則,或是必須給宗教機構的員工提供避孕藥,這是另一個把自由權絕對化,卻不尊重宗教自由的舉動。


政權要認識自己的有限、容易犯錯,容易腐敗,才不至於無限擴大其權力和功能。“三權分立”的本意就是用政府各部門間權力的制衡來約束濫權。另一方面,2008年的金融風暴和近年全球暖化所帶來的災難證明,政府也需要適當加強對市場監督的功能,不能無為而治。雖然在他的時代,伯克也曾大力鼓吹自由放任的經濟政策,可是在今天這個高度複雜的社會裡,在經濟政策上“完全放任”,為企業“弱肉強食”背書,並不是件好事。


既然人都是不完全的,都是有私心(霸權思想)的,或許“保守主義”也應當對人類社會,特別是弱勢族群,更具有同情心,不再僅僅以短期經濟利益來做着眼點?“保守主義”並不一定必要作富人和大企業的家奴。這才是真正的道德制高點,而不是在道德上自以為義,唯我獨尊。


基督徒的角色


基督徒所着重的是“天國降臨”,是在世上“為光、為鹽”。在這個前提下,他以個人的身份,可以參與任何政黨,以發揮“光、鹽”的作用。因為政與教之間的關係是複雜的、動態的、而且目標回異,基督徒不應當把基督教的信仰與某個政黨劃上等號。


不過,這次大選的結果反映了一個新的社會現實,就如美南浸信會神學院的院長阿爾波特·莫勒牧師(Albert Mohler Jr.)在選後發出的微博所表達的:“我們的國家正面臨着一個基本的道德調整。”


過去30多年來,基督徒參政主要是被“宗教右派”所定義,這批熱心人士一方面批判美國社會的世俗化,另一方面期望借着參政和立法來扭轉世俗化的趨向。從近年的民調看來,這種努力反被視為“弄權”、“自義”、“不容忍異己”,帶來了的反感,以及年青人大批離開傳統教會。


就如政治上重新思考“保守主義”一樣,我認為基督徒也應當重新思考文化使命。這並非要基督徒從所謂“社會議題”上退卻,而是要有天國的視野和更務實的做法。耶穌在世的時候所最痛恨的罪惡是偽善、律法主義、缺乏憐憫、不照顧弱勢族群。他的公義、正直、無私,乃是從他對人類真實的關懷和愛心裡流露出來。他對上帝的敬畏是從他自己的順服和信靠中表現出來。他提醒門徒們:真正的問題出在我們自己,需要改變的是我們自己。(路22:31-34)


這些年來有很多“好戰心強”的基督徒專以定罪他人為事,控訴世界不留餘力,但對周圍人群卻沒有耶穌的愛心。耶穌當年所立的是“服務他人”的模式,是“愛心”的模式,也就是“十字架”的模式。他所關心的,也不只是“信主”者的福祉,而是所有人類的福祉,更是所有創造的福祉。這個胸襟今天似乎很少看到,真理的定義變得狹窄了。


基督徒如果僅僅關心神學枝節上的爭論,沒有積極的同情心的流露,以及服務社會(特別是弱勢族群)的實際,基督教就很難贏得話語權,也因此很難向着人的心(“大象”)說話。這不正就成了保羅所謂“鳴的鑼、響的鈸”一般嗎?


在這次競選的教訓之後,我希望基督徒,特別是福音派的基督徒,更能有天國的胸懷和使命感,能夠走出那個把宗教信仰與黨派政治過分掛鈎的誤區。人性是狡猾的,只有當政治和宗教在組織和執行上保持一定距離,它們間的互動才會更有效益,更有價值。宗教信仰也才能更為自由,不致於受到政治的污染。


————————————————————————————————————


zt:God Elects Obama?
送交者: mean 2012月11月07日07:27:39 於 [彩虹之約] 發送悄悄話
回  答:zt: Election, Biblically 由 mean 於2012-11-07 07:25:39

On God’s Election of Obama


by C Michael PattonNovember 7th, 2012Comments 8 Comments

I have kept an eye on what people are saying in my circles about Obama’s re-election. Things don’t look too good there. Fear, anger, frustration, and hopelessness are filling the thoughts of those of us who are supposed to have the most hope. There is no time that the sin of idolatry comes to light more than after a Presidential election. One person I know says that they are taking off a week of work to recover. Another says they are leaving the country. Yet another says this is the downfall of America. It is the end. The downfall of America? The end? Really?

It is hard for me to get too upset about these elections. Sure, there are implications. These implications extend to my family and my job. They make me look at the people in my country and think, “Really, is this who we are now? Is this what it has come down to?” Were I to place the full weight of my body (which is getting lighter every day!) on the chair of human achievement, I suppose I would feel less secure today than I did yesterday. But I don’t and I can’t. In fact, I found myself rejoicing once the results came in.

Obama is our president for the next four years. How bad is that? I suppose I could talk about all the issues involved, both economic and moral. I suppose I could talk about how much worse it is now going to get. I suppose that I could get ready for the most bleak outcome: increased unemployment, higher taxes, less pay, fewer donations to Credo House, waiting in line for health care, homosexual marriage, increased toleration for the death of the unborn, increased intoleration for Christianity, and a thousand other things. But this would lack perspective. Whether it is Obama or Romney, I pause and take account of this fact: I live in the most secure, free, and moral country that has probably ever existed. And we are a long way from giving up this title. Are we heading toward a “fall”? Maybe, but we are still a long way from the cliff. In fact, it is not even in sight yet.

But let us say for the sake of argument that Obama is the iconic president who will lead the charge off the cliff. Let us say that America is heading for disaster. Let us say that in ten years our teeth will be on edge due to the sour grapes that Obama is handing out. Let us say that Obama will be the cause for an imminent loss of security, freedom, and morality. What then? If we knew this without a doubt, what then? Is itthen time to despair? Is it then time for us to rent our cloaks, shave our heads, and go into mourning? How could it be?

My favorite theologian and philosopher, Bono, once said in a song about Christ’s death, “I held the scabbard when the soldier drew his sword. I threw the dice and they pierced his side. But I have seen love conquer the great divide” (“When Love Comes to Town”). The worst event in the history of the world is when we hung our Creator on a tree and let him die. We all went to the polling booth and said, “We will not have this man to rule over us.” We voted against the very incarnation of goodness, righteousness, and truth. We held the scabbard of the soldier’s sword as he killed our savior. Yet, while this was the worst event in the history of humanity, it was also the best. While it was a day for the greatest mourning in the history of the world, it was also a day for the greatest rejoicing in the history of the world. While angels gawked at the arrogance of man, they gawked more at the love of God. God drew the sword on himself that day. He was in charge. I held the scabbard as the King of Kings was unelected from office. Yet God’s plan was that through evil greatness might be revealed. Have we not learned? Do we stand in the crowd in front of the cross with hopeless despair or with great anticipation and excitement of what God is doing?

We all stand in front of the cross on election day, not knowing what God’s plan is. Will righteousness be delivered or killed? Will evil triumph or be smothered? Will we begin to heal or continue to be beaten? Who knows? But what we don’t have the right to do is keep from rejoicing in anticipation that our Father is going about his business and he has something in mind.

Obama has been reelected. Please don’t come down too hard on me as I rejoice. Me and my kids got down on our knees tonight and prayed that Romney would win. He did not. Yet, in a very real way, I am excited. No, I don’t agree with Obama, his policies, his plans, or his dreams. Yet I have this really awesome Father who does incredible things like kill his own Son. I have this Father who knows what he is doing and is in complete control. I have this Father who elected Barack Obama as his man and you are not going to believe what comes next. Yes, it looks bad. Yes, there are a lot of people in this crowd crying. Yes, they are without hope. But let me tell you about the way he works. It is too cool.

I am in the crowd tonight listening. Dashed dreams and hopelessness are topics of conversation. But I can’t join in. I know the Guy in charge of all this. And because I know his M.O., I will hold the scabbard with great anticipation and joy. God’s will has been done tonight and I can’t wait to see what he does next. Don’t fault me for rejoicing in the unexpected and unwanted. I can’t help it. This is Christianity 101.

“Remind them to be submissive to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready for every good work, to speak evil of no one, to avoid quarreling, to be gentle, and to show perfect courtesy toward all people.” –Titus 3:1-2

Pray for my president that God elected tonight. I commit to loving and encouraging him. I will speak no ill-will of him. He is the man God elected and my arms are laid down. There is no authority except from God and who am I not to hold the scabbard of God’s mission? Selah.



zt: Election, Biblically
送交者: mean 2012年11月07日07:25:39 於 [彩虹之約] 發送悄悄話

Thinking about the Election from a Biblical Point of View (Sam Storms)


by Sam StormsNovember 5th, 2012Comments 15 Comments

This past week I came across a statement by Marvin Olasky concerning the national election on Tuesday:

“Sinful humans with all our quirks will decide who controls the White House and Congress.

But under a sovereign God, the election is no crapshoot.”

You may not find comfort in the truth of that statement, but I certainly do. Yes, I am offended and fed up with the hostility in the current campaign. The lies and spin and distortions and underhanded things that people will do to get elected make me sick. Yes, in my weaker moments I get somewhat anxious, and occasionally terrified, about what “sinful humans” with all their “quirks” might decide two days from now. And my guess is that most of you feel the same way, regardless of which political party you support.

But Marvin Olasky is right: “under a sovereign God, the election is no crapshoot.” Who ultimately ends up in Congress and the White House is not, in the final analysis, subject to the whims and moods of the American people. From a purely human point of view, it may appear to be a “crapshoot”, but I assure you that God is in complete control.

So what I propose to do in this article is set before you eight biblical principles that I hope and pray will both inform you about how you and I ought to think of government and politics as well as inspire you with unshakable confidence in the supremacy and sovereignty of God over all things.

And rest assured, I have no intention of endorsing a particular candidate or political party. I do intend to articulate some truths from God’s Word that ought to give direction to how you should vote. But in the final analysis, when you step into that booth on Tuesday, you are bound by your conscience, not mine. I’ve got enough “quirks” of my own to worry about!

Eight Theses on God and Government

(1) Human government is not inherently evil. The structures of authority in any particular political system are not per se wicked. All human governmental authority comes ultimately from the hand of God. Government is used for evil because people are sinful, not because the authority of the ruling party is wicked or should be abolished.

I don’t know how to say it with greater clarity than Paul did in Romans 13:1 – “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.” God never sanctions anarchy.

Some appeal to Luke 4:6 to prove that all government is demonic. There Satan showed Jesus all the kingdoms of the world and said: “To you I will give all this authority and their glory, for it has been delivered to me, and I give it to whom I will.” But there is no reason to trust what Satan says. As Jesus says in John 8:44, “there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”

There are numerous passages that affirm government to be a gift of God and controlled by God. So, are we going to believe Satan or are we going to believe Paul in Romans 13? If that were not enough, consider this. Satan claimed that he had authority to “give” power in earthly kingdoms to whomever he wills. Yet in Daniel 4:17 we read that “the Most High [God] rules the kingdom of men” and that he, God, “gives it to whom he will and sets over it the lowliest of men.” Whom are you going to believe? I choose to believe Daniel and the Spirit of God speaking through him.

What is also clear from these texts is that the legitimacy of earthly governmental power is not dependent upon how someone comes to power. Whether a government exists because a monarch has appointed his son to rule, or a tribal chieftain has slaughtered his rivals, or a candidate has garnered the required number of votes in an electoral college, all governmental authority is there because God put it there.

That doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter ethically or morally or legally how someone came to power. Of course it does. The Bible is not endorsing the stealing of votes or the manipulation of an election. It is simply reminding us that even the sinful shenanigans of human beings are never outside God’s control and that his purpose will be accomplished, even if it means he has to use the wicked ways of men to bring it about.

Man did not create government. God did. Man does not sustain it. God does. Civil authority is God’s idea in this age.

(2) God is absolutely sovereign and authoritative over who rules, where they exercise their power (its boundaries and extent), over whom they have authority, and for how long.

God spoke to one of the most wicked and powerful rulers in human history, thePharaoh of Egypt, and said: “But for this purpose I have raised you up, to show you my power, so that my name may be proclaimed in all the earth” (Exodus 9:16; seeRomans 9:17).

Daniel spoke to the corrupt and barbaric Nebuchadnezzar, king over Babylon, and declared: “Blessed be the name of God forever and ever, to whom belong wisdom and might. He changes times and seasons; he removes kings and sets up kings” (Daniel 2:20-21a; cf. vv. 36-38).

Later Daniel said much the same to Belshazzar, declaring: “O king, the Most High God gave Nebuchadnezzar your father kingship and greatness and glory and majesty” (Daniel 5:18; cf. vv. 24-37 and Jer. 27:5-7).

Note well: Daniel makes these affirmations of God’s sovereignty in the context ofthe domination of the Jews by Gentiles! In other words, God not only controls the history of his own people (whether Israel or the Church), but also of the “secular” world as well. And the oppression of his own people is no indication that he has lost control or that he is any less sovereign than when his people are safe and blessed.

Consider the divisions at Barnes & Noble or any other bookstore between the “Religion” section and all others such as “European History” or “U. S. History”, or “Current Events”, etc., as if God is active and relevant only in overtly “religious” matters! According to Daniel, his sovereignty is limitless and all-inclusive!

Or think about what Jesus himself said to Pontius Pilate, who from a human perspective appeared to hold the fate of Jesus in his hands: When Pilate said to Jesus, “Do you not know that I have authority to release you and authority to crucify you?” Jesus answered him, “You would have no authority over me at all unless it had been given you from above” (John 19:10-11a).

Jeroboam was one of the most wicked kings of Israel, and yet 1 Kings 12:15 describes the political intrigue that put him in place and says: “It was a turn of affairsbrought about by the Lord.”

And if God is responsible for the establishment of every governmental authority, he must of necessity also be responsible for the disestablishment of all! This is precisely what we read in Daniel 2:21 – “he removes kings and sets up kings.” Again, in Isaiah 40:23-24 we read that God:

“brings princes to nothing, and makes the rulers of the earth as emptiness. Scarcely are they [princes and rulers] planted, scarcely sown, scarcely has their stem taken root in the earth, when he blows on them, and they wither, and the tempest carries them off like stubble” (Isaiah 40:23-24).

(3) God is not only sovereign in that he decides who shall rule and for how long, but he also can exert omnipotent and irresistible influence over the hearts and minds of kings and rulers and presidents to do what he wants done.

If this one strikes you as somewhat extreme, consider just a handful of biblical examples that prove my point:

“But Sihon the king of Heshbon would not let us pass by him, for the LORD your God hardened his spirit and made his heart obstinate, [so] that he might give him into your hand, as he is this day” (Deuteronomy 2:30).

“The king’s heart is a stream of water in the hand of the LORD; he turns it wherever he will” (Proverbs 21:1). And if it’s true of the “king” then it is no less true of presidents, senators, congressmen, governors, and mayors!

“In the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, [in order] that the word of the LORD by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, so that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom and also put it in writing” (Ezra 1:1).

“And they kept the Feast of Unleavened Bread seven days with joy, for the LORD had made them joyful and had turned the heart of the king of Assyria to them, so that he aided them in the work of the house of God, the God of Israel” (Ezra 6:22).

“Blessed be the LORD, the God of our fathers, who put such a thing as this into the heart of the king, to beautify the house of the LORD that is in Jerusalem” (Ezra 7:27).

“[God] says of Cyrus, ‘He is my shepherd, and he shall fulfill all my purpose’; saying of Jerusalem, ‘She shall be built,’ and of the temple, ‘Your foundation shall be laid.’ Thus says the LORD to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have grasped, to subdue nations before him and to loose the belts of kings, to open doors before him that gates may not be closed: ‘I will go before you and level the exalted places, I will break in pieces the doors of bronze and cut through the bars of iron, I will give you the treasures of darkness and the hoards in secret places, that you may know that it is I, the LORD, the God of Israel, who call you by your name. For the sake of my servant Jacob, and Israel my chosen, I call you by your name, I name you, though you do not know me. I am the LORD, and there is no other, besides me there is no God; I equip you, though you do not know me’” (Isaiah 44:28-45:5).

Because all authority to rule and to govern comes from God, those in authority are called God’s “ministers” (Romans 13:4) and God’s “servants” (Romans 13:6Jer. 25:9) and even his “shepherd” (Isaiah 44:28) and his “anointed” (Isaiah 45:1). These words are descriptive of their function, and say nothing about any supposed religious or spiritual or personal relationship to God. They are God’s servants and ministers because they accomplish his will in history, not because they believe in him or love him.

“[F]or truly in this city there were gathered together against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever your hand and your plan had predestined to take place” (Acts 4:27-28; see also Revelation 17:17).

It was God who stirred up Nebuchadnezzar to launch an assault on Israel (Jeremiah 25:8-9) and it was God who determined the outcome of the battle:

“In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it. And the Lord gave Jehoiakim king of Judah into his hand, with some of the vessels of the house of God. And he brought them to the land of Shinar, to the house of his god, and placed the vessels in the treasury of his god” (Daniel 1:1-2).

Observe that “the Lord gave” . . . Ultimately it was neither the sin and weakness of Jehoiakim nor the brilliance and strength of Nebuchadnezzar, not even the impotence or inactivity of God, but the sovereign good pleasure of Yahweh that determined the historical outcome (cf. Dan. 2:20-23). The Israelites “are not mere pawns on a political and geographical chessboard. To be in the hand of Nebuchadnezzar is not to be out of the control of God” (John Goldingay, 22).

This is one reason Paul urges “that supplications, prayer, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way” (1 Timothy 2:1-2). We are to pray that the Most High God would stir their spirits, move upon their hearts, change their thinking, shape their character, and incite them to enact legislation all to accomplish what would be most beneficial to the church, the people of God.

(4) Although we are ultimately citizens of a heavenly kingdom and only secondarily citizens of an earthly state, we are not for that reason exempt from submitting to the laws of the land where we live (1 Peter 2:13-17).

Our responsibility to honor and submit to the government of our country is not dependent on whether or not we voted for its leaders or like them. Perhaps I should repeat that!

Let me explain. Peter knew what it was like to live under tyranny and barbarism. He was born under the rule of the Emperor Augustus. But the more direct authority over his life in those early days in Galilee would have been King Herod the Great who ordered the slaughter of the male infants in and around Bethlehem in an attempt to kill the new born Jesus.

Peter would also have experienced the rule of Herod Antipas who executed John the Baptist and not only presided over the mock trial of Jesus but joined with the soldiers under his authority to torment and ridicule our Lord. Peter would have known Pontius Pilate, the governor of Judea, who washed his hands of Jesus’ murder, had him beaten, and delivered him over to be crucified. Peter was especially acquainted with Herod Agrippa, who executed James, the brother of John, and arrested Peter with the intent of doing the same to him. Then, of course, Peter lived under the tyrannical rule of Nero.

My point is simply to argue that Peter wasn’t naïve about the potential for corruption and evil in those who held governmental and political power. He didn’t live in a “Christian nation”. He knew all too well about the depravity of these men who wielded authority in Rome and Palestine. And yet here he tells us, without hesitation, to “be subject for the Lord’s sake to every human institution,” whether emperors or kings, and to “honor” them.

It’s important to hear what Peter says in this text because his description of Christians as “exiles” and “aliens” and “sojourners” on the earth (1 Peter 1:1; 2:11) might lead some to think that they are exempt from earthly rules and laws and obligations to human authorities. After all, if I am a citizen of a heavenly kingdom, why should I bother obeying the dictates of an earthly system? If this world is not my ultimate home, being as I am an alien and exile in this world, I shouldn’t have to care about following the standards and rules that govern those who know nothing of God or his heavenly kingdom. Right? Wrong!

It is, of course, true that Christians are not first citizens of any earthly nation but citizens of the kingdom of God. Paul write sin Philippians 3:20, “Our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ.” Christians are aliens, exiles, and mere sojourners in America. But that does not mean we are free to live in anarchy or in defiance of the government that God has placed over us.

Peter may also have been anticipating the possibility that some might call for our complete withdrawal from the world and from society. On numerous occasions in history Christian communities have created their own spiritual ghettos and enclaves and communes in which they swear allegiance only to themselves and refuse to acknowledge the authority of the state in any respect. I think Peter is saying, No, you can’t do that.

There is yet another reason Peter says what he does in this passage. Look at v. 15. Just as our conduct in general can be used of God to bring people to saving faith in Christ, so also our law-abiding obedience to the governing authorities can silence the unwarranted accusations of those who oppose us.

Although there is much in this passage, what I want you to see is that all of life, even our political lives, in relation to the governing authorities, must be grounded in God and for God and reflect our relationship to God. Why do I say that?

Let’s start with v. 13 where Peter justifies his exhortation: it is “for the Lord’s sake.” Our obedience to the governing authorities is at best only secondary. Our primary allegiance is to God. We obey them because we obey him. Peter also intends to say by this that our ultimate aim in obedience to the law of the land is the glory of God. It is for his “sake,” i.e., to bring honor to him and to make known his greatness and his majesty that we give our lives in obedience to the emperor or king or president or whoever is in power.

We do not simply obey in order to preserve our reputation but to enhance and promote his!

This God-centered approach to our civic duties is again made clear in v. 15. We live in obedience to the law because it is “the will of God” that in doing so we silence those who persist in accusing us and slandering us (recall 1 Peter 2:12). Again, according to v. 16 we are to live in this world not primarily as the subjects of an earthly president but as “servants of God.”

(5) Although we are submissive to the authority of government, Christians have a responsibility as citizens of both heaven and earth to influence for good the government under which they live.

Let me mention only a couple of examples where believers publicly criticized government and its leaders and sought to exert a positive influence on governmental officials and held them accountable to biblical values of morality.

“Therefore, O king, let my counsel be acceptable to you: break off your sins by practicing righteousness, and your iniquities by showing mercy to the oppressed, that there may perhaps be a lengthening of your prosperity” (Daniel 4:27).

“So with many other exhortations he [John the Baptist] preached good news to the people. But Herod the tetrarch, who had been reproved by him for Herodias, his brother’s wife, and for all the evil things that Herod had done, added this to them all, that he locked up John in prison” (Luke 3:18-20).

“After some days Felix came with his wife Drusilla, who was Jewish, and he sent for Paul and heard him speak about faith in Christ Jesus. And as he reasoned about righteousness and self-control and the coming judgment, Felix was alarmed and said, ‘Go away for the present. When I get an opportunity I will summon you’” (Acts 24:24-25).

When Paul says that God ordains human government and invests it with authority, he does not mean to suggest that government is therefore free to do as it pleases. It is subject to God and his will. Government is not morally autonomous. The church is the conscience of the state. Let’s not forget that in 1 Peter 5:13 Peter calls Rome “Babylon”!

On what issues ought we seek to exert our influence? Certainly it would include such matters as sexual morality, dignity of life (i.e., abortion), education, the environment, poverty and homelessness, war and national defense, the principles of right and wrong that govern the economy, and marriage and family, just to mention a few.

We read in Romans 13 and elsewhere that the primary purpose of the state is to preserve and protect public morality, justice, and to insure the punishment of the offender. It is not the purpose of the state to promote the gospel, but to provide a legal and moral atmosphere in which the church can do its work (1 Tim. 2:1-2).

Thus when you vote you should ask the question: Which candidates or which political party is most effective in promoting moral righteousness and praising good when it appears and who is most committed to punishing and prohibiting evil? Which candidates or which political party is most sincerely committed to the advancement of biblical values.

If someone says that in doing this we are legislating our morality, we should respond by saying, “Well, yes, of course we are!” But if we don’t legislate our morality you can rest assured they will legislate theirsAll laws are moral statements. Every law that forbids some action or requires another is declaring that something is either wrong or right, that it is either beneficial or destructive to society.

(6) Although Christians are responsible to exert a positive influence on government, nowhere in the NT do we see that Elders in the local church, by virtue of their being Elders, have authority in or responsibility over local, state, or national government decision-making. Elders can certainly hold public office, but they do so as private citizens and not because of their office in the local church. Likewise, nowhere in the NT do we see governmental officials exerting authority over the local church or selecting its officers or dictating what it must believe or how its people must behave.

(7) No government or earthly authority or political party platform ever sent anyone to hell. Politics has no such power. On the other hand, unrepentant pride and immorality and rebellion and unbelief do send people to hell. They have precisely that power. Similarly, no government or earthly authority or political platform can save a single human soul. On the other hand, Jesus Christ and Jesus Christ alone can.

I hope that provides you with a measure of perspective as you vote on Tuesday. I hope that puts your fears to rest and fills your heart with joy irrespective of the outcome of Tuesday’s election or any election in the years to come.

(8) The confession that “Jesus is Lord” is not simply a declaration of faith and an acknowledgement that He is the Master of our lives individually and as a church. It is also a political statement.

“All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me” (Matthew 28:18), declares Jesus. And he means it! That includes every government in the world. It includes every president, premier, prime minister, and peasant.

It means that how we live every day in relation to the government and our neighbors and our friends and our enemies is to be shaped and energized by the inescapable reality that Jesus has authority over them and over us.

So, with this I close.

Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney is the Savior of the world. Neither is the Savior of America! Whoever is elected President on Tuesday, he is among those small ‘k’ “kings” over whom Jesus rules as capital ‘K’ “King”! Regardless of who wins on Tuesday, Jesus is still “King of kings and Lord of lords” (Revelation 19:16; 17:14).

No matter how things turn out on Tuesday or on any day thereafter, Jesus is still seated at the right hand of the majesty on high. Regardless of the outcome on Tuesday, Jesus will not have failed. Political events are always and ever in his hands, no matter the results. And regardless of how you vote and regardless of who wins, be certain that your faith and confidence and hope are in Jesus Christ, Lord over all of life in heaven and upon the earth!


News:Bishops congrat Obama
送交者: gems 2012年11月07日08:45:39 於 [彩虹之約] 發送悄悄話
US Bishops congratulated President Barack Obama, But we will fight on.


Game on...


:))


------------


Dear President Obama,


In my capacity as President of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, I write to express my congratulations on your re-election as President of the United States.The people of our country have again entrusted you with a great responsibility.The Catholic Bishops of the United States offer our prayers that God will give you strength and wisdom to meet the difficult challenges that face America.


In particular, we pray that you will exercise your office to pursue the common good, especially in care of the most vulnerable among us, including the unborn, the poor, and the immigrant.We will continue to stand in defense of life, marriage, and our first, most cherished liberty, religious freedom.We pray, too, that you will help restore a sense of civility to the public order, so our public conversations may be imbued with respect and charity toward everyone.


May God bless you and Vice President Biden as you prepare for your second term in service to our country and its citizens.


Sincerely yours,


Timothy Cardinal Dolan
Archbishop of New York
President
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
http://usccb.org/news/2012/12-183.cfm








0%(0)
0%(0)
標 題 (必選項):
內 容 (選填項):
實用資訊
回國機票$360起 | 商務艙省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出爐:海航獲五星
海外華人福利!在線看陳建斌《三叉戟》熱血歸回 豪情築夢 高清免費看 無地區限制
一周點擊熱帖 更多>>
一周回復熱帖
歷史上的今天:回復熱帖
2011: 何許人:高舉救恩的杯 - 更新團契獻詩
2011: 書19
2010: 張鈞:“主耶穌的十字架”和“我們的十
2010: 全伊/張鈞兩位弟兄,認識不同,全在階
2009: 懶羊羊,對不起讓你受驚嚇和傷害。
2009: 11月份讀經計劃完成!感謝神!!!
2008: 越走越遠的《海外校園》ZT
2008: 我們也當彼此洗腳
2007: 中國農民工,世界為你流淚 (link)
2007: 視頻鏈接:激流中國-富人與農民工(下