设万维读者为首页 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
简体 繁体 手机版
分类广告
版主:奇异恩典
万维读者网 > 彩虹之约 > 帖子
网友就美国大选精彩转贴
送交者: 黑门山 2012年11月30日07:06:45 于 [彩虹之约] 发送悄悄话
网友就美国大选的几篇精彩转贴


1)ardmore: [转载]展望基督教与保守主义 –美国大选后的反思


2)mean: zt:God Elects Obama? by C Michael PattonNovember 7th, 2012 8 Comments


3)mean: zt: Election, Biblically


4)gems: News:Bishops congrat Obama

[转载]展望基督教与保守主义 –美国大选后的反思
送交者: ardmore 2012年11月29日12:19:23 于 [彩虹之约] 发送悄悄话
 
[转载]展望基督教与保守主义 –美国大选后的反思


作者:临风看世界


一人一票的选举权是很神圣的权利,因为这是选民表明心声,促成权力交替最重要的手段。它甚至可能是个生命攸关的责任,这次(2012)美国大选,亚利桑那州有位28岁的女子,因为丈夫没有投票(反对奥巴马),非常愤怒,开着吉普车从她先生身上辗过去。夫妻因投票反目,这不是第一桩。


大选后的统计数字


这次奥巴马总统胜选连任,给共和党人带来很大的震撼,许多人跌破眼镜。在失业率高涨、国债高筑、人人对经济前途不甚看好的情况下,现任总统怎么可能连任?根据选举当天“出场民调”(exit poll),白人选民有59%选择罗姆尼,39%选择奥巴马。罗姆尼领先20个百分点!白人选民占投票人数的72%,比2008年降了两个百分点。


美国的非裔选民占13%,其中 93%投奥巴马,只有6%投罗姆尼。拉丁裔选民占10%(是美国成长最快速的族群),其中71%投奥巴马,27%投罗姆尼。亚裔只占3%,但有73%投奥巴马,26%投罗姆尼。可见,族裔与选票的关系密切。


如果以年龄来分,18-29岁(占选民19%)的选民有60%投奥巴马,37%投罗姆尼。30-44岁(占27%)的选民52%投奥巴马,45%投罗姆尼。45-64岁(38%)的选民47%投奥巴马,51%投罗姆尼。65岁以上(16%)的选民44%投奥巴马,56%投罗姆尼。我们可以明显看到年龄与选票的关系。


从收入来分,年收入在5万美元以下的,大多数支持奥巴马,年收入超过5万美元的,大多数支持罗姆尼。收入越高,支持罗姆尼的比例越多。(在贫穷线3万以下的家庭占20%选民人口。52%的选民家庭收入在5万到20万之间。)


从宗教信仰来分,信仰各种宗派的新教徒(占选民人口53%)中有42%投奥巴马,57%投罗姆尼。天主教徒(占选民人口25%)中50%投奥巴马(拉美裔为主),48%投罗姆尼。犹太教徒(占选民人口2%)中74%投奥巴马,23%投罗姆尼。其他信仰的人群(包括无宗教信仰)绝大多数支持奥巴马。


“出场民调”发现,越是固定做礼拜的人群,越是支持罗姆尼。白种福音派投罗姆尼的比率达到79%,白种天主教徒投罗姆尼的也有59%。这意味着,在有宗教信仰的族群间,奥巴马的支持者多半是非白人,或是青年信徒。这些数字值得玩味。


美国近年来白种人的人口比率下降的趋势日益明显,社会贫富差距日益严重,社会竞争的游戏规则使得穷人向上移动的机会越来越小,传统制造业工作因外包而逐渐萎缩,高科技工人严重缺乏,只有服务业一枝独秀。再加上债台高筑,在这样转型的现实里,共和党单靠高举小政府、缩减联邦开支、减税(特别是富人的税)、放任的自由市场与自由企业、加强国防、加强边防的理念,已经无法获得大多数人群的支持。


保守主义的地震?


奥巴马的胜利,主要依靠青年人、非裔、拉美裔、亚裔、犹太教徒,以及没有宗教信仰的人。根据皮龙研究中心今年10月的报告,认为自己没有宗教信仰的美国人(不一定是无神论者)已经达到20%,这是美国人口成长最快的族群!我猜测,其中年轻人可能占大多数。


除了总统大选以外,在参院选举中民主党也保持优势。此外,科罗拉多州竟然通过了大麻合法(虽然在联邦法律下还是非法)。美国通过同性婚姻合法化的州也增加了几个。这次选举不但让共和党的“保守主义”遭到滑铁卢,更暴露了美国人口结构与价值趋向的剧变。


凭良心说,罗姆尼是个道地的“生意人”,希望借着经济的低迷上位。他并非正牌的保守派,也没有什么坚定的政治理念。在受到茶党牵制的共和党里,他倒像是个“寄养子”,因缘时会成为唯一有可能当选的总统候选人。


竟选后,除了一批愤怒、失望的人在全国50州发起“脱离联邦”的情绪化动作以外,许多保守阵营的权威和精英们开始痛定思痛,担心共和党在这个人口结构和价值体系急速改变的潮流中被边缘化。带着深厚的危机意识,他们纷纷呼吁,要给共和党重新定位,质疑茶党那种反对任何“联邦政府干预”的极端立场。其实,廿世纪几位最著名的保守主义者:泰德·罗斯福总统、里根总统,以及政论家小威廉·巴克利都比今天的共和党人更为务实,更不讲究意识形态的纯洁。


这批共和党人积极希望重新夺回话语权的主动性,他们认为,当务之急就是:赢得拉美裔的选票(修改移民法);配合年轻人的胃口(注意教育);更多尊重女权,以赢得妇女选票;在经济政策上,不再采取茶党那种绝不妥协的态度。这是全民选举制度的一大优点,没有党派愿意不顾民意,被对手边缘化。惟有这样,政府才有可能成为人民的政府。林肯总统所谓“民有、民治、民享”的理念的确是指导美式民主的一大亮点。


回到保守主义的源头


我不竟要质问,真正的问题在哪里?共和党精英的这些处方是否只是“头痛医头,脚痛医脚”呢?求变是好的,只有在求变中才有进步的可能。自从里根总统振兴共和党以来,经过小布什总统新保守主义路线彻底的失败,加上奥巴马总统两次击败对手,共和党今天似乎已经走到穷途末路,缺乏创意。可是,求变不能变成一个四不像,对吧?如果失去了基本理念,政党就没有生命力,更不要说引发人们的激情和想象力了。


这让我想到现代“保守主义”的鼻祖,18世纪英国的埃德蒙·伯克。他是英国最伟大的“自由主义”思想家之一。国人对他或许不太熟悉,讲到早期的“自由主义”,只听到“天赋人权”、“人民主权论”,认为西方的“保守主义”就是霸权思想和抱残守缺的同义字。这个想法是不确的。


在英王乔治三世治下,伯克领先风气,大力支持美国的独立革命。后来又独排众议,强烈批评法国大革命(请参考拙文《重新思考美国与法国革命的异同》)。并非如《资本论》所批评的,其实伯克在这两种截然不同的立场间毫无矛盾,反倒是非常一致的。


伯克支持美国的独立,因为他同情美国“无代表、不纳税”的诉求,认为英王把殖民地的英国后裔看作奴隶。他看出殖民地人民的新教信仰与自由权的诉求紧密相关,是个很好的模式。然而,法国大革命所主张的自由权则是建立在“启蒙运动”那种抽象的(唯心的?)人权至上、理性至上的前提上。美国宪法保护的不单是国家,更是尊重个人和个人的权利,特别是弱势者的权利。法国革命是维护国家的权利,甚至大多数人的利益,而不惜牺牲少数人的权利。


伯克的保守主义思想根植于他对人性的基本看法。首先,他承接英国自光荣革命以后尊重“自由权”的传统。但他认为,纯粹从抽象的理性(讨论“人类共同”的福祉,而不是真实的个人、家庭、社会组成分子的福祉)作出发点所建立的政治理论,站不住脚,因为那太不实际。非理性的因素(人的个体性)在人的天性中占有极重要的成分,不容忽视。基本上,人是天性脆弱,容易犯错的。人虽然具备有限的理性思维的能力,却对复杂的社会问题、政治问题和历史本身缺乏全面的了解。如果让人按照不完全的理性在真空里(没有传统的依据,没有关注实际对象)做判断、做决策,那是极端危险的。伯克对人性的看法深植于基督教信仰对人性的认知之中,那就是,人性都是有缺陷的,都是自私的、有犯错的倾向的(原罪)。


“政治应当适合人性,而不仅是适合人的推理。理性只是人性中的一部分,而且不是其中最大的部分。”(伯克)


就是在这个理念下,伯克主张限制英王的权限,支持美国的革命。也就是在这个理念下,他质疑法国大革命人权论的基础,在革命初期(1790)就预见了暴政的必然。他认为,人类社会和政权必须尊重传统和历史所积累的知识和经验,不论是个人还是群体,都不能任凭冲动和激情所淹没。近日,海特教授观察到(《再看人民的眼睛》),人们的所谓理性,往往是为自己(或我群)偏执的激情和利益服务的。伯克在18世纪就意识到了!他深知,人心灵里的“大象”是什么。


回到美国今天的情形,在这个日渐多元化的社会里,美国的保守主义如果要重新定位,我认为还应当回到伯克这个起点,也就是认识人性本身的限制,理解那种绝对、放任的自由权(以及今天激进的自由主义)会带来灾害。一个讲究自由和民主的政体不能简单地把理性和自由权绝对化,反倒要尊重传统,尊重宗教信仰的自由,尊重社会道德和规律,尊重历史的经验。


以旧金山为例,一批同性恋者为了伸张自己的自由权,经常裸体在街上行走,完全无视他人良心的道德和尊严,这就是自由权的滥用。如果联邦政府强制宗教团体,雇用人的条件要符合世俗的法则,或是必须给宗教机构的员工提供避孕药,这是另一个把自由权绝对化,却不尊重宗教自由的举动。


政权要认识自己的有限、容易犯错,容易腐败,才不至于无限扩大其权力和功能。“三权分立”的本意就是用政府各部门间权力的制衡来约束滥权。另一方面,2008年的金融风暴和近年全球暖化所带来的灾难证明,政府也需要适当加强对市场监督的功能,不能无为而治。虽然在他的时代,伯克也曾大力鼓吹自由放任的经济政策,可是在今天这个高度复杂的社会里,在经济政策上“完全放任”,为企业“弱肉强食”背书,并不是件好事。


既然人都是不完全的,都是有私心(霸权思想)的,或许“保守主义”也应当对人类社会,特别是弱势族群,更具有同情心,不再仅仅以短期经济利益来做着眼点?“保守主义”并不一定必要作富人和大企业的家奴。这才是真正的道德制高点,而不是在道德上自以为义,唯我独尊。


基督徒的角色


基督徒所着重的是“天国降临”,是在世上“为光、为盐”。在这个前提下,他以个人的身份,可以参与任何政党,以发挥“光、盐”的作用。因为政与教之间的关系是复杂的、动态的、而且目标回异,基督徒不应当把基督教的信仰与某个政党划上等号。


不过,这次大选的结果反映了一个新的社会现实,就如美南浸信会神学院的院长阿尔波特·莫勒牧师(Albert Mohler Jr.)在选后发出的微博所表达的:“我们的国家正面临着一个基本的道德调整。”


过去30多年来,基督徒参政主要是被“宗教右派”所定义,这批热心人士一方面批判美国社会的世俗化,另一方面期望借着参政和立法来扭转世俗化的趋向。从近年的民调看来,这种努力反被视为“弄权”、“自义”、“不容忍异己”,带来了的反感,以及年青人大批离开传统教会。


就如政治上重新思考“保守主义”一样,我认为基督徒也应当重新思考文化使命。这并非要基督徒从所谓“社会议题”上退却,而是要有天国的视野和更务实的做法。耶稣在世的时候所最痛恨的罪恶是伪善、律法主义、缺乏怜悯、不照顾弱势族群。他的公义、正直、无私,乃是从他对人类真实的关怀和爱心里流露出来。他对上帝的敬畏是从他自己的顺服和信靠中表现出来。他提醒门徒们:真正的问题出在我们自己,需要改变的是我们自己。(路22:31-34)


这些年来有很多“好战心强”的基督徒专以定罪他人为事,控诉世界不留余力,但对周围人群却没有耶稣的爱心。耶稣当年所立的是“服务他人”的模式,是“爱心”的模式,也就是“十字架”的模式。他所关心的,也不只是“信主”者的福祉,而是所有人类的福祉,更是所有创造的福祉。这个胸襟今天似乎很少看到,真理的定义变得狭窄了。


基督徒如果仅仅关心神学枝节上的争论,没有积极的同情心的流露,以及服务社会(特别是弱势族群)的实际,基督教就很难赢得话语权,也因此很难向着人的心(“大象”)说话。这不正就成了保罗所谓“鸣的锣、响的钹”一般吗?


在这次竞选的教训之后,我希望基督徒,特别是福音派的基督徒,更能有天国的胸怀和使命感,能够走出那个把宗教信仰与党派政治过分挂钩的误区。人性是狡猾的,只有当政治和宗教在组织和执行上保持一定距离,它们间的互动才会更有效益,更有价值。宗教信仰也才能更为自由,不致于受到政治的污染。


————————————————————————————————————


zt:God Elects Obama?
送交者: mean 2012月11月07日07:27:39 于 [彩虹之约] 发送悄悄话
回  答:zt: Election, Biblically 由 mean 于2012-11-07 07:25:39

On God’s Election of Obama


by C Michael PattonNovember 7th, 2012Comments 8 Comments

I have kept an eye on what people are saying in my circles about Obama’s re-election. Things don’t look too good there. Fear, anger, frustration, and hopelessness are filling the thoughts of those of us who are supposed to have the most hope. There is no time that the sin of idolatry comes to light more than after a Presidential election. One person I know says that they are taking off a week of work to recover. Another says they are leaving the country. Yet another says this is the downfall of America. It is the end. The downfall of America? The end? Really?

It is hard for me to get too upset about these elections. Sure, there are implications. These implications extend to my family and my job. They make me look at the people in my country and think, “Really, is this who we are now? Is this what it has come down to?” Were I to place the full weight of my body (which is getting lighter every day!) on the chair of human achievement, I suppose I would feel less secure today than I did yesterday. But I don’t and I can’t. In fact, I found myself rejoicing once the results came in.

Obama is our president for the next four years. How bad is that? I suppose I could talk about all the issues involved, both economic and moral. I suppose I could talk about how much worse it is now going to get. I suppose that I could get ready for the most bleak outcome: increased unemployment, higher taxes, less pay, fewer donations to Credo House, waiting in line for health care, homosexual marriage, increased toleration for the death of the unborn, increased intoleration for Christianity, and a thousand other things. But this would lack perspective. Whether it is Obama or Romney, I pause and take account of this fact: I live in the most secure, free, and moral country that has probably ever existed. And we are a long way from giving up this title. Are we heading toward a “fall”? Maybe, but we are still a long way from the cliff. In fact, it is not even in sight yet.

But let us say for the sake of argument that Obama is the iconic president who will lead the charge off the cliff. Let us say that America is heading for disaster. Let us say that in ten years our teeth will be on edge due to the sour grapes that Obama is handing out. Let us say that Obama will be the cause for an imminent loss of security, freedom, and morality. What then? If we knew this without a doubt, what then? Is itthen time to despair? Is it then time for us to rent our cloaks, shave our heads, and go into mourning? How could it be?

My favorite theologian and philosopher, Bono, once said in a song about Christ’s death, “I held the scabbard when the soldier drew his sword. I threw the dice and they pierced his side. But I have seen love conquer the great divide” (“When Love Comes to Town”). The worst event in the history of the world is when we hung our Creator on a tree and let him die. We all went to the polling booth and said, “We will not have this man to rule over us.” We voted against the very incarnation of goodness, righteousness, and truth. We held the scabbard of the soldier’s sword as he killed our savior. Yet, while this was the worst event in the history of humanity, it was also the best. While it was a day for the greatest mourning in the history of the world, it was also a day for the greatest rejoicing in the history of the world. While angels gawked at the arrogance of man, they gawked more at the love of God. God drew the sword on himself that day. He was in charge. I held the scabbard as the King of Kings was unelected from office. Yet God’s plan was that through evil greatness might be revealed. Have we not learned? Do we stand in the crowd in front of the cross with hopeless despair or with great anticipation and excitement of what God is doing?

We all stand in front of the cross on election day, not knowing what God’s plan is. Will righteousness be delivered or killed? Will evil triumph or be smothered? Will we begin to heal or continue to be beaten? Who knows? But what we don’t have the right to do is keep from rejoicing in anticipation that our Father is going about his business and he has something in mind.

Obama has been reelected. Please don’t come down too hard on me as I rejoice. Me and my kids got down on our knees tonight and prayed that Romney would win. He did not. Yet, in a very real way, I am excited. No, I don’t agree with Obama, his policies, his plans, or his dreams. Yet I have this really awesome Father who does incredible things like kill his own Son. I have this Father who knows what he is doing and is in complete control. I have this Father who elected Barack Obama as his man and you are not going to believe what comes next. Yes, it looks bad. Yes, there are a lot of people in this crowd crying. Yes, they are without hope. But let me tell you about the way he works. It is too cool.

I am in the crowd tonight listening. Dashed dreams and hopelessness are topics of conversation. But I can’t join in. I know the Guy in charge of all this. And because I know his M.O., I will hold the scabbard with great anticipation and joy. God’s will has been done tonight and I can’t wait to see what he does next. Don’t fault me for rejoicing in the unexpected and unwanted. I can’t help it. This is Christianity 101.

“Remind them to be submissive to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready for every good work, to speak evil of no one, to avoid quarreling, to be gentle, and to show perfect courtesy toward all people.” –Titus 3:1-2

Pray for my president that God elected tonight. I commit to loving and encouraging him. I will speak no ill-will of him. He is the man God elected and my arms are laid down. There is no authority except from God and who am I not to hold the scabbard of God’s mission? Selah.



zt: Election, Biblically
送交者: mean 2012年11月07日07:25:39 于 [彩虹之约] 发送悄悄话

Thinking about the Election from a Biblical Point of View (Sam Storms)


by Sam StormsNovember 5th, 2012Comments 15 Comments

This past week I came across a statement by Marvin Olasky concerning the national election on Tuesday:

“Sinful humans with all our quirks will decide who controls the White House and Congress.

But under a sovereign God, the election is no crapshoot.”

You may not find comfort in the truth of that statement, but I certainly do. Yes, I am offended and fed up with the hostility in the current campaign. The lies and spin and distortions and underhanded things that people will do to get elected make me sick. Yes, in my weaker moments I get somewhat anxious, and occasionally terrified, about what “sinful humans” with all their “quirks” might decide two days from now. And my guess is that most of you feel the same way, regardless of which political party you support.

But Marvin Olasky is right: “under a sovereign God, the election is no crapshoot.” Who ultimately ends up in Congress and the White House is not, in the final analysis, subject to the whims and moods of the American people. From a purely human point of view, it may appear to be a “crapshoot”, but I assure you that God is in complete control.

So what I propose to do in this article is set before you eight biblical principles that I hope and pray will both inform you about how you and I ought to think of government and politics as well as inspire you with unshakable confidence in the supremacy and sovereignty of God over all things.

And rest assured, I have no intention of endorsing a particular candidate or political party. I do intend to articulate some truths from God’s Word that ought to give direction to how you should vote. But in the final analysis, when you step into that booth on Tuesday, you are bound by your conscience, not mine. I’ve got enough “quirks” of my own to worry about!

Eight Theses on God and Government

(1) Human government is not inherently evil. The structures of authority in any particular political system are not per se wicked. All human governmental authority comes ultimately from the hand of God. Government is used for evil because people are sinful, not because the authority of the ruling party is wicked or should be abolished.

I don’t know how to say it with greater clarity than Paul did in Romans 13:1 – “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.” God never sanctions anarchy.

Some appeal to Luke 4:6 to prove that all government is demonic. There Satan showed Jesus all the kingdoms of the world and said: “To you I will give all this authority and their glory, for it has been delivered to me, and I give it to whom I will.” But there is no reason to trust what Satan says. As Jesus says in John 8:44, “there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”

There are numerous passages that affirm government to be a gift of God and controlled by God. So, are we going to believe Satan or are we going to believe Paul in Romans 13? If that were not enough, consider this. Satan claimed that he had authority to “give” power in earthly kingdoms to whomever he wills. Yet in Daniel 4:17 we read that “the Most High [God] rules the kingdom of men” and that he, God, “gives it to whom he will and sets over it the lowliest of men.” Whom are you going to believe? I choose to believe Daniel and the Spirit of God speaking through him.

What is also clear from these texts is that the legitimacy of earthly governmental power is not dependent upon how someone comes to power. Whether a government exists because a monarch has appointed his son to rule, or a tribal chieftain has slaughtered his rivals, or a candidate has garnered the required number of votes in an electoral college, all governmental authority is there because God put it there.

That doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter ethically or morally or legally how someone came to power. Of course it does. The Bible is not endorsing the stealing of votes or the manipulation of an election. It is simply reminding us that even the sinful shenanigans of human beings are never outside God’s control and that his purpose will be accomplished, even if it means he has to use the wicked ways of men to bring it about.

Man did not create government. God did. Man does not sustain it. God does. Civil authority is God’s idea in this age.

(2) God is absolutely sovereign and authoritative over who rules, where they exercise their power (its boundaries and extent), over whom they have authority, and for how long.

God spoke to one of the most wicked and powerful rulers in human history, thePharaoh of Egypt, and said: “But for this purpose I have raised you up, to show you my power, so that my name may be proclaimed in all the earth” (Exodus 9:16; seeRomans 9:17).

Daniel spoke to the corrupt and barbaric Nebuchadnezzar, king over Babylon, and declared: “Blessed be the name of God forever and ever, to whom belong wisdom and might. He changes times and seasons; he removes kings and sets up kings” (Daniel 2:20-21a; cf. vv. 36-38).

Later Daniel said much the same to Belshazzar, declaring: “O king, the Most High God gave Nebuchadnezzar your father kingship and greatness and glory and majesty” (Daniel 5:18; cf. vv. 24-37 and Jer. 27:5-7).

Note well: Daniel makes these affirmations of God’s sovereignty in the context ofthe domination of the Jews by Gentiles! In other words, God not only controls the history of his own people (whether Israel or the Church), but also of the “secular” world as well. And the oppression of his own people is no indication that he has lost control or that he is any less sovereign than when his people are safe and blessed.

Consider the divisions at Barnes & Noble or any other bookstore between the “Religion” section and all others such as “European History” or “U. S. History”, or “Current Events”, etc., as if God is active and relevant only in overtly “religious” matters! According to Daniel, his sovereignty is limitless and all-inclusive!

Or think about what Jesus himself said to Pontius Pilate, who from a human perspective appeared to hold the fate of Jesus in his hands: When Pilate said to Jesus, “Do you not know that I have authority to release you and authority to crucify you?” Jesus answered him, “You would have no authority over me at all unless it had been given you from above” (John 19:10-11a).

Jeroboam was one of the most wicked kings of Israel, and yet 1 Kings 12:15 describes the political intrigue that put him in place and says: “It was a turn of affairsbrought about by the Lord.”

And if God is responsible for the establishment of every governmental authority, he must of necessity also be responsible for the disestablishment of all! This is precisely what we read in Daniel 2:21 – “he removes kings and sets up kings.” Again, in Isaiah 40:23-24 we read that God:

“brings princes to nothing, and makes the rulers of the earth as emptiness. Scarcely are they [princes and rulers] planted, scarcely sown, scarcely has their stem taken root in the earth, when he blows on them, and they wither, and the tempest carries them off like stubble” (Isaiah 40:23-24).

(3) God is not only sovereign in that he decides who shall rule and for how long, but he also can exert omnipotent and irresistible influence over the hearts and minds of kings and rulers and presidents to do what he wants done.

If this one strikes you as somewhat extreme, consider just a handful of biblical examples that prove my point:

“But Sihon the king of Heshbon would not let us pass by him, for the LORD your God hardened his spirit and made his heart obstinate, [so] that he might give him into your hand, as he is this day” (Deuteronomy 2:30).

“The king’s heart is a stream of water in the hand of the LORD; he turns it wherever he will” (Proverbs 21:1). And if it’s true of the “king” then it is no less true of presidents, senators, congressmen, governors, and mayors!

“In the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, [in order] that the word of the LORD by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, so that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom and also put it in writing” (Ezra 1:1).

“And they kept the Feast of Unleavened Bread seven days with joy, for the LORD had made them joyful and had turned the heart of the king of Assyria to them, so that he aided them in the work of the house of God, the God of Israel” (Ezra 6:22).

“Blessed be the LORD, the God of our fathers, who put such a thing as this into the heart of the king, to beautify the house of the LORD that is in Jerusalem” (Ezra 7:27).

“[God] says of Cyrus, ‘He is my shepherd, and he shall fulfill all my purpose’; saying of Jerusalem, ‘She shall be built,’ and of the temple, ‘Your foundation shall be laid.’ Thus says the LORD to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have grasped, to subdue nations before him and to loose the belts of kings, to open doors before him that gates may not be closed: ‘I will go before you and level the exalted places, I will break in pieces the doors of bronze and cut through the bars of iron, I will give you the treasures of darkness and the hoards in secret places, that you may know that it is I, the LORD, the God of Israel, who call you by your name. For the sake of my servant Jacob, and Israel my chosen, I call you by your name, I name you, though you do not know me. I am the LORD, and there is no other, besides me there is no God; I equip you, though you do not know me’” (Isaiah 44:28-45:5).

Because all authority to rule and to govern comes from God, those in authority are called God’s “ministers” (Romans 13:4) and God’s “servants” (Romans 13:6Jer. 25:9) and even his “shepherd” (Isaiah 44:28) and his “anointed” (Isaiah 45:1). These words are descriptive of their function, and say nothing about any supposed religious or spiritual or personal relationship to God. They are God’s servants and ministers because they accomplish his will in history, not because they believe in him or love him.

“[F]or truly in this city there were gathered together against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever your hand and your plan had predestined to take place” (Acts 4:27-28; see also Revelation 17:17).

It was God who stirred up Nebuchadnezzar to launch an assault on Israel (Jeremiah 25:8-9) and it was God who determined the outcome of the battle:

“In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it. And the Lord gave Jehoiakim king of Judah into his hand, with some of the vessels of the house of God. And he brought them to the land of Shinar, to the house of his god, and placed the vessels in the treasury of his god” (Daniel 1:1-2).

Observe that “the Lord gave” . . . Ultimately it was neither the sin and weakness of Jehoiakim nor the brilliance and strength of Nebuchadnezzar, not even the impotence or inactivity of God, but the sovereign good pleasure of Yahweh that determined the historical outcome (cf. Dan. 2:20-23). The Israelites “are not mere pawns on a political and geographical chessboard. To be in the hand of Nebuchadnezzar is not to be out of the control of God” (John Goldingay, 22).

This is one reason Paul urges “that supplications, prayer, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way” (1 Timothy 2:1-2). We are to pray that the Most High God would stir their spirits, move upon their hearts, change their thinking, shape their character, and incite them to enact legislation all to accomplish what would be most beneficial to the church, the people of God.

(4) Although we are ultimately citizens of a heavenly kingdom and only secondarily citizens of an earthly state, we are not for that reason exempt from submitting to the laws of the land where we live (1 Peter 2:13-17).

Our responsibility to honor and submit to the government of our country is not dependent on whether or not we voted for its leaders or like them. Perhaps I should repeat that!

Let me explain. Peter knew what it was like to live under tyranny and barbarism. He was born under the rule of the Emperor Augustus. But the more direct authority over his life in those early days in Galilee would have been King Herod the Great who ordered the slaughter of the male infants in and around Bethlehem in an attempt to kill the new born Jesus.

Peter would also have experienced the rule of Herod Antipas who executed John the Baptist and not only presided over the mock trial of Jesus but joined with the soldiers under his authority to torment and ridicule our Lord. Peter would have known Pontius Pilate, the governor of Judea, who washed his hands of Jesus’ murder, had him beaten, and delivered him over to be crucified. Peter was especially acquainted with Herod Agrippa, who executed James, the brother of John, and arrested Peter with the intent of doing the same to him. Then, of course, Peter lived under the tyrannical rule of Nero.

My point is simply to argue that Peter wasn’t naïve about the potential for corruption and evil in those who held governmental and political power. He didn’t live in a “Christian nation”. He knew all too well about the depravity of these men who wielded authority in Rome and Palestine. And yet here he tells us, without hesitation, to “be subject for the Lord’s sake to every human institution,” whether emperors or kings, and to “honor” them.

It’s important to hear what Peter says in this text because his description of Christians as “exiles” and “aliens” and “sojourners” on the earth (1 Peter 1:1; 2:11) might lead some to think that they are exempt from earthly rules and laws and obligations to human authorities. After all, if I am a citizen of a heavenly kingdom, why should I bother obeying the dictates of an earthly system? If this world is not my ultimate home, being as I am an alien and exile in this world, I shouldn’t have to care about following the standards and rules that govern those who know nothing of God or his heavenly kingdom. Right? Wrong!

It is, of course, true that Christians are not first citizens of any earthly nation but citizens of the kingdom of God. Paul write sin Philippians 3:20, “Our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ.” Christians are aliens, exiles, and mere sojourners in America. But that does not mean we are free to live in anarchy or in defiance of the government that God has placed over us.

Peter may also have been anticipating the possibility that some might call for our complete withdrawal from the world and from society. On numerous occasions in history Christian communities have created their own spiritual ghettos and enclaves and communes in which they swear allegiance only to themselves and refuse to acknowledge the authority of the state in any respect. I think Peter is saying, No, you can’t do that.

There is yet another reason Peter says what he does in this passage. Look at v. 15. Just as our conduct in general can be used of God to bring people to saving faith in Christ, so also our law-abiding obedience to the governing authorities can silence the unwarranted accusations of those who oppose us.

Although there is much in this passage, what I want you to see is that all of life, even our political lives, in relation to the governing authorities, must be grounded in God and for God and reflect our relationship to God. Why do I say that?

Let’s start with v. 13 where Peter justifies his exhortation: it is “for the Lord’s sake.” Our obedience to the governing authorities is at best only secondary. Our primary allegiance is to God. We obey them because we obey him. Peter also intends to say by this that our ultimate aim in obedience to the law of the land is the glory of God. It is for his “sake,” i.e., to bring honor to him and to make known his greatness and his majesty that we give our lives in obedience to the emperor or king or president or whoever is in power.

We do not simply obey in order to preserve our reputation but to enhance and promote his!

This God-centered approach to our civic duties is again made clear in v. 15. We live in obedience to the law because it is “the will of God” that in doing so we silence those who persist in accusing us and slandering us (recall 1 Peter 2:12). Again, according to v. 16 we are to live in this world not primarily as the subjects of an earthly president but as “servants of God.”

(5) Although we are submissive to the authority of government, Christians have a responsibility as citizens of both heaven and earth to influence for good the government under which they live.

Let me mention only a couple of examples where believers publicly criticized government and its leaders and sought to exert a positive influence on governmental officials and held them accountable to biblical values of morality.

“Therefore, O king, let my counsel be acceptable to you: break off your sins by practicing righteousness, and your iniquities by showing mercy to the oppressed, that there may perhaps be a lengthening of your prosperity” (Daniel 4:27).

“So with many other exhortations he [John the Baptist] preached good news to the people. But Herod the tetrarch, who had been reproved by him for Herodias, his brother’s wife, and for all the evil things that Herod had done, added this to them all, that he locked up John in prison” (Luke 3:18-20).

“After some days Felix came with his wife Drusilla, who was Jewish, and he sent for Paul and heard him speak about faith in Christ Jesus. And as he reasoned about righteousness and self-control and the coming judgment, Felix was alarmed and said, ‘Go away for the present. When I get an opportunity I will summon you’” (Acts 24:24-25).

When Paul says that God ordains human government and invests it with authority, he does not mean to suggest that government is therefore free to do as it pleases. It is subject to God and his will. Government is not morally autonomous. The church is the conscience of the state. Let’s not forget that in 1 Peter 5:13 Peter calls Rome “Babylon”!

On what issues ought we seek to exert our influence? Certainly it would include such matters as sexual morality, dignity of life (i.e., abortion), education, the environment, poverty and homelessness, war and national defense, the principles of right and wrong that govern the economy, and marriage and family, just to mention a few.

We read in Romans 13 and elsewhere that the primary purpose of the state is to preserve and protect public morality, justice, and to insure the punishment of the offender. It is not the purpose of the state to promote the gospel, but to provide a legal and moral atmosphere in which the church can do its work (1 Tim. 2:1-2).

Thus when you vote you should ask the question: Which candidates or which political party is most effective in promoting moral righteousness and praising good when it appears and who is most committed to punishing and prohibiting evil? Which candidates or which political party is most sincerely committed to the advancement of biblical values.

If someone says that in doing this we are legislating our morality, we should respond by saying, “Well, yes, of course we are!” But if we don’t legislate our morality you can rest assured they will legislate theirsAll laws are moral statements. Every law that forbids some action or requires another is declaring that something is either wrong or right, that it is either beneficial or destructive to society.

(6) Although Christians are responsible to exert a positive influence on government, nowhere in the NT do we see that Elders in the local church, by virtue of their being Elders, have authority in or responsibility over local, state, or national government decision-making. Elders can certainly hold public office, but they do so as private citizens and not because of their office in the local church. Likewise, nowhere in the NT do we see governmental officials exerting authority over the local church or selecting its officers or dictating what it must believe or how its people must behave.

(7) No government or earthly authority or political party platform ever sent anyone to hell. Politics has no such power. On the other hand, unrepentant pride and immorality and rebellion and unbelief do send people to hell. They have precisely that power. Similarly, no government or earthly authority or political platform can save a single human soul. On the other hand, Jesus Christ and Jesus Christ alone can.

I hope that provides you with a measure of perspective as you vote on Tuesday. I hope that puts your fears to rest and fills your heart with joy irrespective of the outcome of Tuesday’s election or any election in the years to come.

(8) The confession that “Jesus is Lord” is not simply a declaration of faith and an acknowledgement that He is the Master of our lives individually and as a church. It is also a political statement.

“All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me” (Matthew 28:18), declares Jesus. And he means it! That includes every government in the world. It includes every president, premier, prime minister, and peasant.

It means that how we live every day in relation to the government and our neighbors and our friends and our enemies is to be shaped and energized by the inescapable reality that Jesus has authority over them and over us.

So, with this I close.

Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney is the Savior of the world. Neither is the Savior of America! Whoever is elected President on Tuesday, he is among those small ‘k’ “kings” over whom Jesus rules as capital ‘K’ “King”! Regardless of who wins on Tuesday, Jesus is still “King of kings and Lord of lords” (Revelation 19:16; 17:14).

No matter how things turn out on Tuesday or on any day thereafter, Jesus is still seated at the right hand of the majesty on high. Regardless of the outcome on Tuesday, Jesus will not have failed. Political events are always and ever in his hands, no matter the results. And regardless of how you vote and regardless of who wins, be certain that your faith and confidence and hope are in Jesus Christ, Lord over all of life in heaven and upon the earth!


News:Bishops congrat Obama
送交者: gems 2012年11月07日08:45:39 于 [彩虹之约] 发送悄悄话
US Bishops congratulated President Barack Obama, But we will fight on.


Game on...


:))


------------


Dear President Obama,


In my capacity as President of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, I write to express my congratulations on your re-election as President of the United States.The people of our country have again entrusted you with a great responsibility.The Catholic Bishops of the United States offer our prayers that God will give you strength and wisdom to meet the difficult challenges that face America.


In particular, we pray that you will exercise your office to pursue the common good, especially in care of the most vulnerable among us, including the unborn, the poor, and the immigrant.We will continue to stand in defense of life, marriage, and our first, most cherished liberty, religious freedom.We pray, too, that you will help restore a sense of civility to the public order, so our public conversations may be imbued with respect and charity toward everyone.


May God bless you and Vice President Biden as you prepare for your second term in service to our country and its citizens.


Sincerely yours,


Timothy Cardinal Dolan
Archbishop of New York
President
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
http://usccb.org/news/2012/12-183.cfm








0%(0)
0%(0)
标 题 (必选项):
内 容 (选填项):
实用资讯
回国机票$360起 | 商务舱省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出炉:海航获五星
海外华人福利!在线看陈建斌《三叉戟》热血归回 豪情筑梦 高清免费看 无地区限制
一周点击热帖 更多>>
一周回复热帖
历史上的今天:回复热帖
2011: 何許人:高举救恩的杯 - 更新团契献诗
2011: 书19
2010: 张钧:“主耶稣的十字架”和“我们的十
2010: 全伊/张钧两位弟兄,认识不同,全在阶
2009: 懒羊羊,对不起让你受惊吓和伤害。
2009: 11月份读经计划完成!感谢神!!!
2008: 越走越远的《海外校园》ZT
2008: 我们也当彼此洗脚
2007: 中国农民工,世界为你流泪 (link)
2007: 视频链接:激流中国-富人与农民工(下