>>Ha ha, that INT was not Warner's fault whatsoever. Why? Because that was a timing pattern...three step drop and ball out... You could say that James Harrison read the play perfectly and jumped the route. But Warner bears no responsibility on that play.

The truth is Warner read the defense wrong, he thought Harrison would drop, but instead Harrison took one fake step back and then stayed there. Warner was confused and didn't react quickly enough, he had to bear some responsibility.

>>Again, that was not a fumble. It is a shame a review was not initiated by the booth. Not saying that the Cards would have scored on a Hail Mary, but it was just unfair.

That could be or could not be a fumble, by determining it was not a fumble is biased already. I aggreed that there at least should be a review, but you did show your bias by call it was a fumble.

Oh well, I know you might write something back because you are a lawyer to be, but hey, we WON, hahaha...