设万维读者为首页 广告服务 技术服务 联系我们 关于万维
简体 繁体 手机版
分类广告
版主:红树林
万维读者网 > 五 味 斋 > 帖子
哈佛教授著述论未来中美之战,12/16几率可能吗?
送交者: 福禄 2017年06月12日08:22:30 于 [五 味 斋] 发送悄悄话

It starts with the Athenian historian's chronicle of the conflict between Sparta and Athens in the fifth century B.C. as a way to tackle the larger question of whether war can be averted when an aggressive rising nation threatens a dominant power. Allison, a renowned Harvard University scholar and national security expert, studied 16 such cases over the past 500 years; in 12 there was war.

For three-quarters of a century, the U.S. has been the dominant world power. China is now challenging that hegemony economically, politically and militarily. Both countries, with vastly different political systems, histories and values, believe in their own exceptionalism.

The two nations, Allison argues, are "currently on a collision course for war," which he says can be averted only if both demonstrate skill and "take difficult and painful actions to avert it." 

I've known Allison for almost four decades. He's been sweeping in and out of government, serving five Republican and Democratic administrations from Washington and his perch at Harvard. He's a first-class academic with the instincts of a first-rate politician. He brings to the "Thucydides Trap" an impressive sweep of history and geopolitical and military knowledge. Unlike some academics, he writes interestingly.

Allison analyzes why so many rising powers ended up in wars with established ones, and why some didn't. The best contemporary examples are the German rise that led to World War I contrasted with the confrontation between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, which was kept from escalating into hot war for more than four decades.

In the early part of the 20th century, the U.K. was threatened by an emerging Germany, which had been unified decades before by Bismarck, and which was blowing past Britain economically and moving up on its naval dominance. The political leaders in the U.K., Allison writes, were beset by anxieties and Germany emboldened by ambition. Mutual mistrust, an arms race and World War I followed.

After World War II, facing the menacing challenge from the Soviet Union, the U.S. fashioned the policy of containment, starting with the extraordinary Marshall Plan to rebuild war-ravaged allies and adversaries. With smart diplomats and presidents, from John F. Kennedy's handling of the Cuban missile crisis through Ronald Reagan's engagement with Mikhail Gorbachev, war was averted before the Soviet Union collapsed.

The rise of China offers a classic Thucydides trap. In 1980, China's economy was only a tenth the size of the U.S. economy. By 2040, Allison reckons, it could be three times larger. China considers itself the most important power in Asia, irrespective of U.S. commitments and alliances with allies in the region. With President Donald Trump presiding over a White House hostile to international institutions, Chinese President Xi Jinping has at least a claim on the title of premier global leader.

Allison depicts plausible scenarios of how conflicts between these two superpowers could break out: disputes over Taiwan or the South China Sea, or an accidental provocation by a third party -- it was the assassination of an Austrian archduke by a Serbian terrorist that triggered World War I -- or, less likely, a quarrel related to economic competition.

The most dangerous threat lurks in the Korean peninsula, where North Korea has nuclear warheads and is trying to develop the missile technology to hit San Francisco. What happens if the Pyongyang regime collapses and its strongman, Kim Jong-un is eliminated? 

In March, Xi explained the nuances of the Korean situation to Trump, whose White House had warned that "if China is not going to solve North Korea, we will."

If that's a military threat, consider: An assault on North Korea would be answered by missile attacks against nearby Seoul that could kill as many as a million people. Imagine that followed by an invasion of the north by the U.S. and South Korea to prevent more carnage. Would China sit still for a unified Korean peninsula allied with the U.S.? The answer was no in 1950, to General Douglas MacArthur's shock, when it was much less powerful, confident and ambitious.

Allison isn't a pessimist. He argues that with skillful statecraft and political sensitivity these two superpowers can avoid war.

Xi is a ruthless autocrat, but a smart one with a sense of history and China's customary patience. 

In the U.S., by contrast, the current commander-in-chief shows little interest in history and is irrational, insecure and impulsive.

That's scary.


0%(0)
0%(0)
    有名地fivethirtyeight算黑鬼算地挺准,可是。。  /无内容 - 胡鲁 06/12/17 (129)
      就是。  /无内容 - 萨德 06/12/17 (132)
  大家错误理解了统记地意死,几率=信则零。  /无内容 - 胡鲁 06/12/17 (89)
      故意写别字,让人猜也让人弄不懂,类似黑社会的暗语黑话  /无内容 - 北美朋友 06/12/17 (132)
        按下葫芦夫妻瓢。。。。。 - 括号 06/12/17 (102)
      不好一思,不是故意,是懒,还得找同音字。就通假吧。  /无内容 - 胡鲁 06/12/17 (139)
        我是故意的。。。。全面学习应用口非非。。。。。。  /无内容 - 括号 06/12/17 (125)
      你那种垃圾智力的蠢货就不要来卖弄了 - 深山兰 06/12/17 (170)
        专门舔花柳病女人裤裆的垃圾=深山兰  /无内容 - 8宝饭 06/12/17 (105)
          你这种鼠辈的智力太低下了。老鼠的头脑主要靠 - 深山兰 06/12/17 (114)
            你要死要活是你自己的选择,没人拦你。 - 8宝饭 06/12/17 (126)
    这个百分比有来源,retrieve统计 - 福禄 06/12/17 (134)
      原文没用“几率”这个词。。。。 - 括号 06/12/17 (139)
      拿菠萝奔尼撒战争来说事不太好。。。。。 - 括号 06/12/17 (134)
    瞎猜而已。哈佛教授基本上都是混饭的没有真知灼见  /无内容 - 北美朋友 06/12/17 (87)
      2030年搞不好土共已经被习包子整熄火了 - 福禄 06/12/17 (130)
        当年雅典是被极端的政治正确整熄火的。。。。。 - 括号 06/12/17 (112)
        按照普利高津的观点,一个系统,在其 - 深山兰 06/12/17 (129)
        这是可以肯定的。只是你老兄的预测很谨慎,很有可能在2030前  /无内容 - 北美朋友 06/12/17 (131)
标 题 (必选项):
内 容 (选填项):
实用资讯
北美最全的折扣机票网站
贝佳药业美国专利【骨精华】消关节痛、骨刺、五十肩【心血通】改善心绞痛
一周点击热帖 更多>>
一周回复热帖
历史上的今天:回复热帖
2016: 梦男这个没有民族气节的家伙,支持土豆
2016: 中国人争吵支拿,证明他们比日本文化落
2015: 从四名留守儿童喝农药自杀看打工经济与
2015: 中国当前的主要问题不是“共”,而是没
2014: 冬冬,俺对大麻不反对不鼓励,请问
2014: 给5味快闪一张小5比较年轻时的正面照片
2013: K19, 能量或者波等,算不算物质? 那个双
2013: 给K小盆友科普一哈什么是空
2012: 六四学生心中,有没有想推倒政府?劳驾
2012: 马网请看暗网新建议