FEATURES MAIN Closer to the Bottom By JACQUELINE DOHERTY There's reason to believe that the stock-market averages will hit bottom sometime in the next few months, even if the economy is still in the middle of a recession. The buy-and-hold approach still applies. Subscribe Now Close this window With these readers: My Yahoo Reader Google Reader Pluck Reader Windows Live Reader MSN Reader Newsgator Reader Netvibes Reader AOL Reader Bloglines Reader Or copy the rss link: FOR THE TENS OF MILLIONS OF INVESTORS WHO HAVE been nervously watching the U.S. stock market's 40% decline in the past 12 months, and it's 18% drop in the past week alone, history holds some solace: There is a case to be made that the averages will hit bottom sometime in the next few months, even if the economy is in the middle of a recession. Indeed, stocks showed some signs of finding a bottom late Friday, with the Dow Jones industrial average closing down just 128 points on the day, after having plummeted about 700 points earlier in the session. The Nasdaq Composite even managed a small gain on the day. Investors will be watching for a possible market bounce that could occur early this week, especially if any new measures to ease the global economic crisis emerge from the weekend's meeting in Washington of the finance ministers of the so-called G-7 industrial nations. [pic] Scott Pollack for Barron's The lesson of history is this: The average U.S. recession since the late 1940s has lasted 10 months, and stocks typically hit their low point about three months before the recession ends. So, if the U.S. entered a recession on July 1, as many economists now suggest, and the recession was to last until April 2009, a typical bottom for stocks would occur some time in the next few months. Granted, much depends on the ability of the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury to put rescue measures in place that will unlock today's frozen capital markets. And there are nagging concerns that the next disaster may lurk in the unregulated $60 trillion market for credit-default swaps. But the fear that sent the market down so sharply last week may have driven stocks close to their ultimate lows. "I don't think this is the end of America as we know it," says Byron Wien, chief investment strategist at Pequot Capital Management. "I think it's conceivable that the markets will bottom before year end." Wien cites a number of positive events in recent weeks. The Treasury now has the ability, through the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), to start buying distressed assets from banks. There is speculation the federal government will come up with yet another program to help the housing market. Oil prices have fallen below $80 a barrel from levels above $140, a slide that on its own should boost economic growth. And smart investors have started buying at what they hope are good prices. Barclays (ticker: BCS) purchased Lehman Brothers' investment-banking operations in the U.S. Warren Buffett took stakes in General Electric (GE) and Goldman Sachs (GS). Citigroup (C) and Wells Fargo (WFC) actually fought over the right to buy Wachovia (WB). Recessions certainly have been both shorter and longer than the 10-month average. On a positive note, five recent recessions were shorter. The 1980 recession lasted a mere six months, and there were four recessions that lasted only eight months, according to data from Bespoke Investment Group. [chart] But a mild recession wasn't what the market feared last week. Investors were worried the current economic slump will be "different" from those in the past. American consumers are carrying more debt this time around, and the banking system is in much more fragile shape. THOUGH A TYPICAL RECESSION would end by next spring, economists are paying increasing attention to longer downturns, specifically the two recessions since 1940 that each lasted 16 months. The November 1973 to August 1975 downdraft was sparked by the Arab oil embargo, while the July 1981 to November 1982 recession was triggered by the Federal Reserve hiking interest rates dramatically to curtail runaway inflation. In each case stocks bottomed about three months before the recession ended. The good news today is that stocks appear to have gotten out ahead of any recession, falling so sharply that they might already have priced in pretty horrible times ahead. The Dow is down almost as much in the past year as the 45% it fell in the 1973-1975 recession, and its 12-month decline far exceeds the 24% it lost in the period leading up to and during the 1981-1982 recession, according to Birinyi Associates. Today's 40% drop also far surpasses the average bear-market slide of 30% since 1940. Markets that decline for more than a year average a loss of 42%, says Paul Desmond, President of Lowry Research Corp. The Dow has fallen by more than 40% 10 other times, with all but one such drop occurring between 1900 and 1930. It slid by more than 50% only once, between 1929 and 1932, when it shed 89%. That bear was bracketed by the Great Depression, which lasted for 44 months. A recession is labeled a depression when economic activity shrinks by 10% or more. From August 1929 to March 1933 U.S. economic output contracted by more than 30%. That's what made it "Great." Table: Stocks and Recessions: What History Tells Us But back in the 'Thirties, the financial markets lacked many of today's safety nets, like deposit insurance, and the Federal Reserve didn't loosen the purse strings quickly, as the Fed lately has done. Also, the stock-market rally leading up to the Depression was much more frenzied. From 1921 to 1929, the market rose almost 500%. In the rally from 1987 to 2000, stocks jumped 574%, but did so over a much longer period. From 2002 to the market's peak in October 2007, the Dow rose 94%. Given stocks' swoon in the past 12 months, prices look much more reasonable today. The companies in the Standard & Poor's 500 trade for an average of 11.6 times the profits that analysts expect them to earn next year. And the index trades at 17.1 times the companies' most recent earnings. That's only slightly below the market's 60-year average price/earnings multiple of 17.8, according to Birinyi Associates. The current P/E is still high compared to the low P/Es of previous major recessions. During the '74, '80 and '82 recessions, the S&P's trailing P/E dropped to between 6.8 and 7.2. But in the '70, '90 and '01 economic downturns, the P/E ranged from 12.9 to 23.5. The Bottom Line Though dangers aplenty still lurk for the economy and the market, studies of stock-market performance through recessions suggest the Dow could see its low shortly. One person who fears further market declines is Wayne Nordberg, chairman of Hollow Brook Associates. "This is the end of the great credit supercycle," he says. "It takes a very long time to unwind." Or, as Doug Cliggott, manager of the Dover Management Long-Short Sector Fund, put it with regard to the TARP, "we're fighting a forest fire with a garden hose." But such gloomy sentiments aren't a reason to get out of the stock market. It could be quite the opposite, in fact. Consider that $1 invested in stocks from February 1966 through May 2007 would have grown to $16.58 in that period. That's a 7% annual return. By contrast, investors who were out of the market in the five best days each year during that span were left with only 11 cents. That's a pretty good case for the buy and hold philosophy, or, if you're out of the market, for getting back in soon.