| Just kidding...However |
| 送交者: 5yuan 2008月08月24日12:37:01 于 [教育学术] 发送悄悄话 |
| 回 答: I mean Life Science. It was my 由 广东南蛮 于 2008-08-24 12:22:00 |
|
I agree with you only partially. The investment in the 80th in life science is not really wasted. It has achieved a huge leap in life science itself and, as a byproduct, in biotech industry. More than 90% of new drugs are life science products these days, if you do know the fact.
By the way, in a restricted definition, agriculture is excluded from life science. If you look the funding list of National Institutes of Health, it is clear. |
|
|
|
|
 | ||
|
 |
| 实用资讯 | |
|
|
|
|
| 一周点击热帖 | 更多>> |
|
|
|
| 一周回复热帖 |
|
|
| 历史上的今天：回复热帖 |
| 2006: | 展示大学“风范” 北大请起诉《纽约时 | |
| 2006: | 为他人做嫁衣裳--大部分科学家的命运 | |
| 2005: | 谁可称“国学大师” | |
| 2005: | 钱锺书是麻木的“大师”? | |
| 2004: | 舌尖上的爱国主义 | |
| 2004: | 点评化学类及有机化学类重要期刊 | |
