和充满敌意和自以为是的态度。什么“忠实拥趸”，“显然也没听进去“今年之遗传学已经不是去年的遗传学”这话的意思”。

你的基因概念是标准答案吗？只有你是权威，别人都不对？虽然你琢磨了10年，问题依然。我的理解，目前本质上只是不同的理解，没有绝对对错之分，人类基因组研究的官方网站，译文的题目就是“How Many Genes Are in the Human Genome?”（见luye的跟贴），开头和结尾说：

“Although the completion of the Human Genome Project was celebrated in April 2003 and sequencing of the human chromosomes is essentially "finished," the exact number of genes encoded by the genome is still unknown. October 2004 findings from The International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, led in the United States by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) and the Department of Energy (DOE), reduce the estimated number of human protein-coding genes from 35,000 to only 20,000-25,000, a surprisingly low number for our species (7). Consortium researchers have confirmed the existence of 19,599 protein-coding genes in the human genome and identified another 2,188 DNA segments that are predicted to be protein-coding genes.”
。。。。。
“Even with improved genome analysis, computation alone is simply not enough to generate an accurate gene number. Clearly, gene predictions will have to be verified by labor-intensive work in the laboratory before the scientific community can reach any real consensus .”

你误解了我的基因概念，我说的表达调控不是单指调控转录，也包括翻译调控及转录后、翻译后调控等。我是这么表述的：基因的概念包括编码蛋白多肽和独立功能性RNA的编码核苷酸序列以及启动子、增强子、Micro等附属的表达调控性序列。在我的概念中，MicroRNA、反义RNA等算附属调控序列，不算独立基因。

当然，晚上仔细看了以后，发现我也误读了你的选择性剪接，和选择性转录的表述，你没有混淆。向你表示抱歉。

除此之外，我坚持自己的看法，在我这几天的陈述中，除了一个2450和DNA(应为核酸）两个字误外，没有哪个概念有错，搞学术的人，没有你想象得那么复杂，嘿嘿。