小崔從不自己正面回應,後面這個“紳士”看着像牽繩的。不過這個紳士也是東扯西扯迴避主要問題,即:轉基因食品有害的種種說法依據是什麼?“紳士”給出的鏈接里我有兩個打不開,只有路透社的報道打開了(http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/06/07/131270519/americans-are-wary-about-genetically-engineered-foods)。裡面說“One thing everyone seems to agree on is that a food should say on its label if it's from some genetically modified animal or plant — 9 in 10 people surveyed said so.” 這個十個裡有九個說的是虛數。但是就在這一段之前,文章里同樣說“People who are a little older, make more money and have at least a college degree are most likely to think safety is not an issue for the foods, whose qualities have been altered by laboratory manipulation of DNA.”說明米國有點文化的人們對科研工作者還是比較信任的。
還是那句話, 科學的問題還是要回歸科學。真正該對轉基因危害性提出質疑的應該是廣大農業和生命科學家,而不是主持人、記者、經濟和法律教授。