中国微生物学会病毒学专业委员会主任委员郭德银教授致辞

现在，世界上每一个对冠状病毒进行基因组分析的病毒实验室都了解到，冠状病毒肯定是科学家人为设计的。证据就在病毒本身:用于基因插入的工具仍然存在于遗传密码中。由于这些独特的基因序列不是随机出现的，它们本身就证明了这种病毒是由实验室的科学家人为设计的。

然而，令全世界震惊不已的是，世界卫生组织和美国疾病管制与预防中心（CDC）为了保护共产中国和它的生化武器计划，却掩盖了真相，因为任何一个政府都不想让公众知道，政府实验室其实会经常爆发疫情。

例如，几十年前，美国陆军运营的埃博拉生物武器实验室里的一名科学家让一只猴子感染上埃博拉病毒。结果证明，这种毒株只能在猴子之间传染，不能传染给人类，世界因此躲了一劫。但美国陆军最终用化学炸弹“核化”了整个设施，杀死所有的猴子，把留在美国土地上的最后一点病毒残余也消灭得干干净净。

理查德·普雷斯顿（Richard Preston）的《危险地带》一书讲述的是，1989年，在美国弗吉尼亚州的莱斯顿的灵长类动物检疫所发现并控制了一种破坏性极强的热带丝状病毒，莱斯顿于是成了一场生化危机的中心。爆发的原因是，人们发现埃博拉病毒可以通过空气管道传播。这个故事令人毛骨悚然且广为人知，由于担心引起恐慌，被整个美国的医疗机构极力掩盖，直到很多年以后,曾经在疾控中心运输受感染的病人进了达拉斯医院,另一个受感染的护士造成了永久性肾损伤。

这些病毒泄露的实例是帮助我们了解中国的冠状病毒情况。在对待这次武汉冠状病毒问题时，我们必须首先认识到，病毒学研究实验室在控制病毒泄露方面经常出现失误，就连美国在研究致命的病毒毒株时也不能保证万无一失。中国的BSL-4实验室已发生过多次SARS病毒株的意外泄露。现在，这次武汉的新型冠状病毒已被确认为一种人工合成的毒株，目的是用来作为生化武器或疫苗试验。

病毒的基因组编码不是自然的。就像你永远不可能在沙漠中遇到一条正在写有着单词和语法的书的蛇那样，现在在冠状病毒株中发现的基因序列毫无疑问证明了，人类工程师一直在对这种病毒株进行增补。

用基因技术实现这个基因工程的手段之一叫做穿梭pShuttle，这种技术可携带大量基因插入目标病毒。

下图为pShuttle手段的完整基因序列:

用穿梭的办法在一篇题为“生成重组腺病毒的简化系统”的文章中有描述。

论文的摘要描述了“一种简化此类病毒的产生和生产的策略”。“这是实现病毒基因工程的过程:

重组腺病毒质粒是用最少的酶操作产生的，在细菌中使用同源重组，而不是在真核细胞中。将这些质粒转染到哺乳动物的包装细胞系后，在绿色荧光蛋白的帮助下，病毒的产生就可以很方便地进行，而绿色荧光蛋白是由整合到病毒主干中的基因编码的。同质病毒就可以从这个过程中获得，无需空斑纯化。

这篇论文描述了这种方法将如何“加速重组腺病毒的产生和测试过程”。

当然，在这个过程中，穿梭质粒会留下独特的代码，即基因改造的“指纹”。现在我们在冠状病毒中发现的就是这个指纹。

基因学研究人员James Lyons-Weiler在分析文章中揭示，在野外传播的冠状病毒中发现了穿梭基因代码。这证明了这种病毒是由人类科学家设计的。

“IPAK的研究人员发现了pshuttel – sn重组向量序列和INS1378之间的序列相似性，

另一个基因序列也显示与SARS冠状病毒的突刺蛋白有92%的匹配:

这个研究过程被中国研究人员申请了专利，如图所示。

穿梭质粒被用于将SARS基因插入冠状病毒，这一过程使其对人类具有致命性，“正在进行SARS疫苗研究的研究人员一再警告不要进行人体试验。

2019年ncov的疾病进展与动物和人类接种SARS疫苗后再感染的进展一致。因此，必须认真考虑2019-nCoV是一种实验性疫苗类型的假设。

他还警告说，“一些研究报告了动物(老鼠、雪貂和猴子)的严重免疫病理反应，在这些研究中，接种了冠状病毒疫苗的动物在随后接触到野生型冠状病毒时，往往有极高的呼吸衰竭率。”

他的结论是:

如果中国政府一直在进行抗非典的人体试验。MERS或其他使用重组病毒的冠状病毒可能会使其公民在感染2019-nCoV冠状病毒后更容易患上急性呼吸窘迫综合征。

Lyons-Weiler并不是唯一一个评估冠状病毒基因工程起源的人。北京大学传染病博士董宇宏（音，Yuhong Dong）在《大纪元时报》上写道:

根据最近发表的科学论文，这种新型冠状病毒具有前所未有的病毒学特征，这表明建造它使用了基因工程。该病毒具有严重的临床特征，对人类构成巨大威胁。全世界的科学家、医生和人民，包括政府和公共卫生当局，必须尽一切努力调查这一神秘可疑的病毒，正本清源，最终保护人类的未来。

董教授提醒道，1月30日《柳叶刀》(Lancet)上的一篇科学论文的结论是，“重组可能不是这种病毒出现的原因。”换句话说，这不是通过自然突变在野外发生的。

他还提到1月27日由5名希腊科学家进行的一项研究，该研究的结论也是，在野外发现的“家谱”中，冠状病毒与其他病毒没有血缘关系。他写道:

5名希腊科学家们分析了2019 – ncov的遗传关系,发现“新冠状病毒中，几乎一半的基因组来自一个全新的没有密切遗传关系的亚属内sarbecovirus病毒家族”，这说明2019-nCoV是一种新型冠状病毒。研究者们否认了2019-nCoV源于不同冠状病毒之间随机自然突变的原始猜想。

董教授提到的在《柳叶刀》发表论文的Roujian Lu，是中国疾病预防控制中心国家病毒病预防控制所中国生物安全重点实验室的Roujian Lu。

首先，该疫情于2019年12月下旬首次报告，当时武汉大部分蝙蝠物种都在冬眠。第二，华南海鲜市场没有出售或发现蝙蝠，只卖各种非水生动物(包括哺乳动物)。第三，2019-nCoV与其近亲属bat-SL-CoVZC45和bat-SL-CoVZXC21的序列一致性小于90%。因此，bat-SL-CoVZC45和bat-SL-CoVZXC21并不是2019-nCoV的直系祖先。

换句话说，2019-nCoV并非来自蝙蝠。这意味着整个主流媒体在冠状病毒的真正起源问题上对我们撒谎。

这篇论文还强调了官方解释中的错误信息，称“许多最初确认的2019-nCoV案例与武汉市场有关，但高达45%的案例(包括最早的几个案例)与武汉市场无关。”

Roujian Lu和赖恩斯-维勒都指出，SARS冠状病毒中存在一种结合蛋白序列，使其能够轻易感染人类细胞。如《大纪元》所述:

…尽管武汉冠状病毒和感染人的冠状病毒和整体低同源的武汉冠状病毒S蛋白有相当大的遗传距离，武汉冠状病毒S蛋白有几个补丁受体结合(RBD)域的序列与SARS-CoV 的同源性高。据报道，SARS-CoV s蛋白中442、472、479、487和491位的残基位于受体复杂界面，被认为对SARS-CoV的跨物种和人际传播至关重要。所以令我们惊讶的是，尽管取代了5个重要的界面氨基酸残基中的4个，武汉CoV s蛋白被发现与人类ACE2具有显著的结合亲和力。… 武汉CoV s蛋白和SARS-CoV s蛋白在RBD域中具有几乎相同的三维结构，因此在相互作用界面上保持了相似的范德华和静电性质。因此，武汉CoV仍然能够通过S蛋白- ace2结合途径对人类传播造成重大公共卫生风险。

正如董博士问的那样，“这种新病毒怎么可能如此聪明，能够在特定位点发生精确突变，同时又能保持其与人类ACE2受体的结合亲和力?”病毒是如何改变s蛋白的四个氨基酸的?病毒知道如何使用有规律的聚集间隔的短回文重复(CRISPR)来确保这种情况发生吗?”换句话说，这不可能是偶然发生的。冠状病毒在野外并不是随机突变的，而是精心设计的。

世界各地的许多科学家目前正在对在冠状病毒中发现的基因序列进行研究，他们越来越多地认定，病毒的成分已经被改造。这些科学家中的许多人正受到威胁和审查。已经有一篇论文被迫撤回并修改，毫无疑问是为了删除冠状病毒基因工程起源的关键结论，但不能永远否认其人为精心设计的证据。

最终，科学机构肯定会这样的结论:这种冠状病毒株是被人为改造过的，或所有的遗传科学法则恰好都没有起作用，基因测序是虚构的(有点像“进步的”左派的变性论，他们已经放弃了生物学上的现实)。那么基因科学将面临这样的质疑：要么该冠状病毒是基因工程的产物，要么科学机构将不得不抛弃基因学已取得的全部研究成果。

到目前为止，他们还在试图欺骗公众，让他们相信这一切都是大自然的某种意外，这种宣传确实有用，因为大多数公众没有足够的科学知识来反驳官方的宣传。然而，世界各地有足够多的独立科学家证明，这次爆发的毒株是由人为设计的。

上周，每隔12个小时就会收到更新数据，有趣的是，就在此前的14个小时，所有官方的冠状病毒感染和死亡数字被冻结了，似乎世界上每个国家都同意停止报告新的数字，这种现象是前所未有的。与此同时，CDC目前确认了第11例冠状病毒感染病例，这表明尽管CDC在努力控制疫情，感染仍在继续蔓延。

原文链接

翻译报道：白夜

By Mike Adams

(Natural News) Every virology lab in the world that has run a genomic analysis of the coronavirus now knows that the coronavirus was engineered by human scientists. The proof is in the virus itself: The tools for genetic insertion are still present as remnants in the genetic code. Since these unique gene sequences don’t occur by random chance, they’re proof that this virus was engineered by scientists in a lab.

But the WHO and CDC are covering up this inconvenient fact in order to protect communist China and its biological weapons program, since no government wants the public to know the full truth about how frequently government-run labs experience outbreaks. Decades ago, for example, the U.S. Army ran an Ebola bioweapons lab in the United States, where a monkey infected one of the scientists there. The strain turned out to be infectious only in monkeys, not humans, so the world dodged a bullet, but the U.S. Army “nuked” the entire facility with chemical bombs, killing all the monkeys and wiping out any last remnant of the virus on U.S. soil.

You can read the full details of that incident in the book The Hot Zone by Richard Preston. We’ve also covered it at NaturalNews.com, where this book description is reprinted:

In 1989, Reston, VA — one of the most famous U.S. planned communities located about 10 miles from Washington DC — stood at the epicenter of a potential biological disaster. This well-known story was narrated by Richard Preston in a bone chilling account related to the recognition and containment of a devastating tropical filovirus at a monkey facility — the Reston Primate Quarantine Unit.

That outbreak occurred because Ebola was found to be spreading through the air ducts, confirming that Ebola can spread through the air. This simple fact was vigorously covered up by the entire medical establishment during the Ebola scare in the United States many years later, where the CDC transported an infected patient to a hospital in Dallas, subsequently infecting a nurse who was treated with highly toxic chemicals that caused permanent kidney damage (she later sued the hospital for the damage she suffered).

The reason this is relevant is because in order to understand the coronavirus situation in China, we must first realize that virology research labs routinely experience lapses in containment. Even the United States has failed to contain deadly viral strains when trying to study them. China’s BSL-4 labs have experienced multiple accidental releases of SARS strains, and this new coronavirus is now confirmed to be an engineered strain that was either used in bioweapons research or vaccine experiments.

The genomic coding in the virus is not natural, in other words. Just as you would never encounter a snake in the desert that’s writing a book containing words and grammatical structure, the genetic sequences now identified in the coronavirus strain are, without question, proof that human engineers have been tinkering with the strain.

How to genetically engineer viruses: the pShuttle vector

One of the tools used to accomplish this genetic engineering is called pShuttle. It’s a genetic tool set that can carry a payload of genes to be inserted into the target virus.

Researchers engaged in genetic engineering can purchase the pShuttle sequence from online retailers such as AddGenes.org, which sells the sequence for $75, shipped in “bacteria as agar stab.”

The following map outlines the complete gene sequence of the pShuttle tool:

The method for using pShuttle is described in a PubMed document entitled, “A simplified system for generating recombinant adenoviruses.”

The summary of the paper describes, “a strategy that simplifies the generation and production of such viruses.” Here’s how the process works to achieve genetic engineering of viruses:

A recombinant adenoviral plasmid is generated with a minimum of enzymatic manipulations, using homologous recombination in bacteria rather than in eukaryotic cells. After transfections of such plasmids into a mammalian packaging cell line, viral production is conveniently followed with the aid of green fluorescent protein, encoded by a gene incorporated into the viral backbone. Homogeneous viruses can be obtained from this procedure without plaque purification.

The paper describes how this approach will, “expedite the process of generating and testing recombinant adenoviruses.”

During this process, of course, the pShuttle leaves behind unique code, a “fingerprint” of the genetic modification. It is this fingerprint that has now been identified in the coronavirus.

As revealed by genomics researcher James Lyons-Weiler in this bombshell analysis article, the pShuttle genetic code is found in the coronavirus that’s circulating in the wild.

This is proof that the virus has been engineered by human scientists.

“IPAK researchers found a sequence similarity between a pShuttle-SN recombination vector sequence and INS1378,” writes Lyons-Weiler for IPAK:

Another gene sequence also shows a 92% match with the Spike protein from the SARS coronavirus:

The process for achieving this was patented by Chinese researchers as shown in this patent link.

The pShuttle vector was used to insert SARS genes into the coronavirus, a process that makes it deadly to humans. “The very researchers conducting studies on SARS vaccines have cautioned repeatedly against human trials,” warns Lyons-Weiler:

The disease progression in of 2019-nCoV is consistent with those seen in animals and humans vaccinated against SARS and then challenged with re-infection. Thus, the hypothesis that 2019-nCoV is an experimental vaccine type must be seriously considered.

He also warns about, “studies that have reported serious immunopathology in animals – rats, ferrets, and monkeys – in which animals vaccinated against coronoviruses tended to have extremely high rates of respiratory failure upon subsequent exposure in the study when challenged with the wild-type coronavirus.”

He concludes:

If the Chinese government has been conducting human trials against SARS. MERS, or other coronviruses using recombined viruses, they may have made their citizens far more susceptible to acute respiratory distress syndrome upon infection with 2019-nCoV coronavirus.

Brighteon.com/a4d2afed-56c6-4602-b6ab-6f777ba4a69a

Another doctor from Beijing Medical University warns the virus appears to be genetically engineered

Lyons-Weiler is not alone in his assessment of the genetic engineering origins of the coronavirus. Dr. Yuhong Dong, who holds a doctorate degree in infectious diseases from Beijing University, writes in The Epoch Times:

Based on recently published scientific papers, this new coronavirus has unprecedented virologic features that suggest genetic engineering may have been involved in its creation. The virus presents with severe clinical features, thus it poses a huge threat to humans. It is imperative for scientists, physicians, and people all over the world, including governments and public health authorities, to make every effort to investigate this mysterious and suspicious virus in order to elucidate its origin and to protect the ultimate future of the human race.

Dr. Yuhong reminds us that a Jan. 30 science paper published in The Lancet concludes that, “recombination is probably not the reason for emergence of this virus.” In other words, this did not occur through natural mutations in the wild.

He also points to a Jan. 27th study by five Greek scientists who also concluded the coronavirus has no lineage to other viruses in the “family tree” that’s found in the wild. He writes:

A Jan. 27 2020, study by 5 Greek scientists analyzed the genetic relationships of 2019-nCoV and found that “the new coronavirus provides a new lineage for almost half of its genome, with no close genetic relationships to other viruses within the subgenus of sarbecovirus,” and has an unusual middle segment never seen before in any coronavirus. All this indicates that 2019-nCoV is a brand-new type of coronavirus. The study’s authors rejected the original hypothesis that 2019-nCoV originated from random natural mutations between different coronaviruses.

“No bats were sold or found at the Huanan seafood market”

Dr. Yuhong writes about The Lancet study by authors Roujian Lu et al., from the China Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, repeating a quote from that paper:

First, the outbreak was first reported in late December 2019, when most bat species in Wuhan are hibernating. Second, no bats were sold or found at the Huanan seafood market, whereas various non-aquatic animals (including mammals) were available for purchase. Third, the sequence identity between 2019-nCoV and its close relatives bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC21 was less than 90%. Hence, bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC21 are not direct ancestors of 2019-nCoV.

In other words, it isn’t from bats.

That means the entire mainstream media is lying to us about the real origins of the coronavirus.

That same paper goes on to underscore the misinformation in the official explanation, stating, “Many of the initially confirmed 2019-nCoV cases—27 of the first 41 in one report, 26 of 47 in another—were connected to the Wuhan market, but up to 45%, including the earliest handful, were not. This raises the possibility that the initial jump into people happened elsewhere.”

Both Lu (in The Lancet paper linked above) and Lyons-Weiler point to the presence of a SARS binding protein sequence in the coronavirus that allows it to easily infect human cells. As explained in The Epoch Times:

…despite considerable genetics distance between the Wuhan CoV and the human-infecting SARS-CoV, and the overall low homology of the Wuhan CoV S-protein to that of SARS-CoV, the Wuhan CoV S-protein had several patches of sequences in the receptor binding (RBD) domain with a high homology to that of SARS-CoV. The residues at positions 442, 472, 479, 487, and 491 in SARS-CoV S-protein were reported to be at receptor complex interface and considered critical for cross species and human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV. So to our surprise, despite replacing four out of five important interface amino acid residues, the Wuhan CoV S-protein was found to have a significant binding affinity to human ACE2. …The Wuhan CoV S-protein and SARS-CoV S-protein shared an almost identical 3-D structure in the RBD domain, thus maintaining similar van der Waals and electrostatic properties in the interaction interface. Thus the Wuhan CoV is still able to pose a significant public health risk for human transmission via the S protein–ACE2 binding pathway. (emphasis added)

As Dr. Yuhong asks, “How could this novel virus be so intelligent as to mutate precisely at selected sites while preserving its binding affinity to the human ACE2 receptor? How did the virus change just four amino acids of the S-protein? Did the virus know how to use Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) to make sure this would happen?”

It couldn’t happen by chance, in other words. The coronavirus is not a random mutation in the wild. It was engineered.

Many other scientists around the world are now investigating the gene sequences found in the coronavirus, and they are increasingly concluding that elements of the virus have been engineered.

Many of those scientists are being threatened and censored. One paper has so far been forced to be withdrawn and revised, no doubt to remove the key conclusions that point to the genetic engineering origins of the coronavirus, but the proof of its engineering cannot be denied forever.

Brighteon.com/0bddc3da-f590-445e-ac38-9a74e358a57c

Either the coronavirus was genetically engineered, or the science establishment is going to have to throw out the entire field of genomics research and claim it isn’t real

Eventually, the science establishment is either going to have to conclude that this coronavirus strain was engineered, or that all the laws of genetics science don’t work, and gene sequencing is imaginary (sort of like transgenderism by the “progressive” Left, which has already abandoned biological reality).

So far they’ve tried to bamboozle the public into believing this is all some sort of accident from Mother Nature, but that has only worked because most of the public doesn’t understand enough science to counter the official propaganda. However, there are more than enough independent scientists around the world to prove that this pandemic strain was engineered by humans. More evidence is coming out each day.

Interestingly, as this article is going to press, all the official numbers of infections and deaths from coronavirus have been frozen for about 14 hours and counting, almost as if every nation of the world has agreed to stop reporting new numbers. This may be a temporary situation that gets resolved in the next few hours, but it’s highly suspicious. For the last week, we’ve been getting new updates about every 12 hours or sooner, and we’ve never seen the count frozen for this long.

At the same time, an 11th case of coronavirus has now been confirmed by the CDC in the United States, revealing that infections are continuing to spread in the USA, despite the efforts of the CDC to contain the outbreak.

Stay informed. Read NaturalNews.com and watch more videos from thousands of channels at Brighteon.com.

https://yournews.com/2020/02/03/

1433704/irrefutable-the-coronavirus-

was-engineered-by-scientists-in-a-lab/

 ******************************