设万维读者为首页 广告服务 技术服务 联系我们 关于万维
简体 繁体 手机版
分类广告
版主:红树林
万维读者网 > 五 味 斋 > 跟帖
这段谈到了mRNA的发明权。没提到是马龙老板的课题
送交者: 对对眼 2023月01月09日16:06:10 于 [五 味 斋] 发送悄悄话
回  答: 文章链接在此,大家自己看吧。当时马龙已经因为反对疫苗对对眼 于 2023-01-09 15:55:19

只提到马龙可能借鉴的前人的想法。根本不是皮肤所说只是拿了老板的艾迪尔打打下手而已

The debate over who deserves credit for pioneering the technology is heating up as awards start rolling out — and the speculation is getting more intense in advance of the Nobel prize announcements next month. But formal prizes restricted to only a few scientists will fail to recognize the many contributors to mRNA’s medical development. In reality, the path to mRNA vaccines drew on the work of hundreds of researchers over more than 30 years.

The story illuminates the way that many scientific discoveries become life-changing innovations: with decades of dead ends, rejections and battles over potential profits, but also generosity, curiosity and dogged persistence against scepticism and doubt. “It’s a long series of steps,” says Paul Krieg, a developmental biologist at the University of Arizona in Tucson, who made his own contribution in the mid-1980s, “and you never know what’s going to be useful”.

The beginnings of mRNA

Malone’s experiments didn’t come out of the blue. As far back as 1978, scientists had used fatty membrane structures called liposomes to transport mRNA into mouse3 and human4 cells to induce protein expression. The liposomes packaged and protected the mRNA and then fused with cell membranes to deliver the genetic material into cells. These experiments themselves built on years of work with liposomes and with mRNA; both were discovered in the 1960s (see ‘The history of mRNA vaccines’).


0%(0)
      反正文章里提到了诺奖前夕争论变得很激烈  /无内容 - 对对眼 01/09/23 (64)
        怎么也不可能轮到他。  /无内容 - pifu01 01/09/23 (68)
          这个阿拉相信你的说法  /无内容 - 对对眼 01/09/23 (70)
            姑且相信你的说法。但诺委颁奖也是紧跟形势的 - 对对眼 01/09/23 (105)
标  题 (必选项):
内  容 (选填项):
实用资讯
回国机票$360起 | 商务舱省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出炉:海航获五星
海外华人福利!在线看陈建斌《三叉戟》热血归回 豪情筑梦 高清免费看 无地区限制