中美南海大决战 民族英雄罗援将军下传军令

 先击沉美军两艘航空母舰 击毙他一万美军再说后话

 凶恶反党反华反人类美帝气焰嚣张 

 竟然指名道姓 狂妄还嘴？！

               By  David  Axe          January 10,  2019

A Chinese admiral and pundit told a trade-show audience that Beijing could resolve China's territorial disputes by sinking two U.S. Navy aircraft carriers and killing thousands of American sailors.

Rear Adm. Lou Yuan's threat isn't an empty one. The Chinese military has deployed an array of weaponry that it acquired specifically to target American flattops.

But a U.S. Navy test in 2005 proved that even if you hit them, carriers are really hard to sink.

Lou made his provocative comment on Dec. 20, 2018 at the Military Industry List summit, according to media reports.

“What the United States fears the most is taking casualties,” declared Lou, an anti-American author, social commentator and military theorist at the PLA Academy of Military Science.

Sinking just one carrier could kill 5,000 Americans, Lou pointed out. Sink two, and you double the toll. "We’ll see how frightened America is" after losing 10,000 sailors, Lou crowed.

Leaving aside the likelihood of a full-scale war breaking out between the world's two leading military powers and economies, sinking a carrier is easier said than done. History underscores the difficulty of the undertaking.

In 1964 Viet Cong saboteurs managed to damage and briefly sink the former U.S. Navy escort carrier Card while the vessel, then operating as an aircraft ferry for U.S. Military Sealift Command, moored in Saigon.

But the last time anyone permanently sank a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier in combat was during World War II. Twelve American carriers sank during the war, usually following intensive air attacks. The last to sink, USS Bismarck Sea, fell victim to Japanese kamikazes in February 1945.

In subsequent decades, American flattops suffered serious accidents including collisions and fires, but none sank. It's very difficult to sink a buoyant, thousand-feet-long ship that's mostly made of steel.

The U.S. Navy knows this from experience. In 2005, the Navy itself targeted the decommissioned carrier America in order to determine just how much punishment the vessel could withstand before slipping beneath the waves.

"The ship was pummeled by explosions both above and below the waterline," The War Zone reporter Tyler Rogoway explained in 2018. "After nearly four weeks of these activities, the carrier was scuttled. On May 14, 2005, the vessel's stern disappeared below the waterline and the ship began its voyage to the seafloor."

"America stood up to four weeks of abuse and only succumbed to the sea after demolition teams scuttled the ship on purpose once and for all, it's clear that America was built to sustain heavy damage in combat and still stay afloat."

Consider also the carrier-shaped pontoon ship that Iran built as a scale target for a 2015 war game. While small and flimsy compared to a real flattop, the pontoon vessel itself endured an intensive assault. "Iran struck the faux carrier with a barrage of anti-ship missiles, then swarmed it with small boats and then landed commandos on it," Rogoway reported.

Still, the fake flattop apparently remained afloat.

To even try to sink an American flattop, you first must hit it. That's not easy, either. No carrier sails without an air wing with as many as 50 fighter aircraft plus several escorting destroyers, cruisers and submarines. A virtual wall of defensive weaponry surrounds the flattop out to a distance of several hundred miles.

Still, China or another country could attempt to target the carriers with submarines, cruise missiles and ballistic rockets. 

"They will employ multiple systems in order to confuse and overwhelm U.S. defenses," naval historian Robert Farley wrote in 2017. "They will rely on the threat of attack to keep U.S. carrier battle groups as far as possible from the main theaters of operation."

"But the observation that the enemy has a missile or torpedo that can kill a carrier only begins a conversation about carrier vulnerability," Farley continued. "Shooting anything at an aircraft carrier is a costly, difficult operation."

The carrier's attackers could face withering counterfire from the vessel's defenders. "Beyond the monetary cost, launching an open attack against an American carrier strike group, with its own cruisers, destroyers and submarines, is almost certainly a suicide mission."

And if the United States' reaction to the 9/11 terror attacks is any indication, Washington surely would deploy all its remaining military might, including its surviving eight or nine carriers, against country behind the sinking.

"So there are two questions that remain for anyone who thinks they even have a shot at taking down one of these enormous steel behemoths," Farley explained. "Can you do it? And even if you can, is it worth it?"

David Axe serves as the new Defense Editor of the National Interest. He is the author of the graphic novels War Fix, War Is Boring and Machete Squad.

谷歌同志一秒钟完工译文：

一位中国海军上将和专家告诉贸易展的观众，北京可以通过击沉两艘美国海军航空母舰并杀死数千名美国水手来解决中国的领土争端。

陆圆上将的威胁并不是空洞的。中国军方已部署了一系列武器，专门针对美国平顶而购置。

但是2005年美国海军进行的一次测试证明，即使您将其击中，航母也确实难以下沉。

据媒体报道，娄在2018年12月20日的军事工业名单峰会上发表了挑衅性的评论。

解放军军事科学院反美作家，社会评论家和军事理论家娄说：“美国最担心的是人员伤亡。”

娄指出，沉没一艘航母可以杀死5,000名美国人。下沉两个，则通行费加倍。劳失去了10,000名水兵后，“我们将看到美国感到多么恐惧”。

撇开世界上两个主要军事大国和经济体之间爆发全面战争的可能性，沉没航母说起来容易做起来难。历史强调了这项工作的难度。

1964年，越共破坏分子设法损坏并短暂击沉了前美国海军护卫舰卡德，当时该船随后作为停泊在西贡的美国军事海上运输司令部的飞机渡轮使用。

但是上一次有人在战斗中永久沉没美国海军航空母舰是在第二次世界大战期间。十二架美国航母在战争期间沉没，通常是在密集空袭之后。最后下沉的Bi斯麦号战舰于1945年2月成为日本神风敢死队的受害者。

在随后的几十年中，美国的平板电脑遭受了严重的事故，包括碰撞和火灾，但没有发生沉没。沉没一艘主要由钢制成的浮力长达数千英尺的船是非常困难的。

美国海军从经验中知道这一点。在2005年，海军本身以退役的美国母舰为目标，以确定在滑入海浪之前船只可以承受的惩罚程度。

战区记者泰勒·罗戈威（Tyler Rogoway）在2018年解释说：“船在水线之上和之下都受到爆炸的袭击。经过近四周的这些活动，航母被击沉。2005年5月14日，船尾消失在下面。水线和轮船开始航行到海底。”

“美国遭受了长达四个星期的虐待，直到拆除队一劳永逸地将船拆毁后才屈服于大海，很显然，美国的建立是为了在战斗中承受沉重的破坏，并仍在继续航行。”

还要考虑伊朗建造的航母型浮桥船，这是2015年战争的规模目标。与真正的平顶船相比，尽管体积小而脆弱，但浮船本身却遭受了强烈的攻击。罗格韦说：“伊朗用一枚反舰导弹击中了这艘人造航母，然后用小船将其拥挤，然后将突击队降落在其上。”

尽管如此，假冒的平板电脑显然仍在漂浮。

甚至要沉没美国平板电脑，您首先必须击中它。这也不容易。如果没有带有多达50架战斗机以及几辆护航驱逐舰，巡洋舰和潜艇的机翼，没有航母就能航行。一面虚拟的防御性武器墙将平板架包围了数百英里。

尽管如此，中国或其他国家仍可以尝试用潜艇，巡航导弹和弹道火箭瞄准航母。

海军历史学家罗伯特·法利（Robert Farley）在2017年写道：“他们将采用多种系统来迷惑和压倒美国的防御。他们将依靠攻击的威胁使美国航母战斗群尽可能远离主要战区。 ”

“但是，观察到敌人拥有可以杀死航母的导弹或鱼雷，才开始谈论航母的脆弱性，”法利继续说道。 “在航空母舰上射击任何东西都是昂贵，困难的操作。”

承运人的攻击者可能会面对船舶防御者的强大逆火。 “除了金钱成本之外，对拥有自己的巡洋舰，驱逐舰和潜艇的美国航母打击组织发起公开攻击几乎肯定是一个自杀任务。”

而且，如果美国对9/11恐怖袭击的反应有任何迹象，华盛顿肯定会部署所有剩余的军事力量，包括幸存的8或9艘航母，向沉没背后的国家部署。

法利解释说：“因此，对于那些认为自己甚至有能力击落其中一个巨大的钢铁庞然大物的人来说，还有两个问题。” “你能做到吗？即使可以，这值得吗？”

大卫·艾克斯（David Ax）担任国家利益的新国防编辑。他是图画小说《战争修正》，《战争无聊》和《弯刀小队》的作者。

        Repeat:

  ******************************

 “给钱给烦了吗？”

 “不是给钱给烦了，而是听话听烦了。

   钱我们不吝惜，要多少吧，一百万，一千万？”

 “甚至能给一万万。”

 “随便吧。割半个俄国吗，我们割。”

“ 看字看烦了吗？”

“ 不是看字看烦了，而是看图看烦了！”

   这哪里是2019年12月16日鸠山由纪夫的容貌？

 这是2019年12月15日星期日 人还在日本的

 日本前首相鸠山由纪夫同志参加

 第3回共和党結党準備会 长达2:48:05视频截图：

       视频链接：

https://twitter.com/ding_gang/status/1207281271833006081

  这是新闻联播报道2019年12月16日巴基斯坦前总理

  肖卡特·阿齐兹同志在北京与王主席（副）合影 

  面部特写：

      这是2019年12月16日完全同一天 阿齐兹同志

      人正在瑞士日内瓦合影照 面部特写：

     这是新闻联播报道2019年12月16日

     杨洁篪同志面部特写写真：

   这是2019年9月11日杨洁篪同志面部写真：

    请逐一点击照片来源链接 验明正身：

http://www.cnsphoto.com/newDetail/single/10991860?pictureId=23766678&keywords=%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%20%E5%93%88%E8%90%A8%E5%85%8B%E6%96%AF%E5%9D%A6%20%E6%89%98%E5%8D%A1%E8%80%B6%E5%A4%AB%20%E6%9D%A8%E6%B4%81%E7%AF%AA%20%E5%A4%96%E4%BA%8B%20%E4%B8%AD%E5%93%88%E5%85%B3%E7%B3%BB

    这是2019年11月1日杨洁篪同志面部写真：

https://6do.news/article/1866905-61

     这是2019年12月3日面部特写写真：

http://tv.cctv.com/2019/12/03/VIDEVCZcrOtDm8hd8mrHglit191203.shtml?spm=C52056131267.PMXrRQiRmhAk.0.0

     这是2018年11月8日：

http://sputniknews.cn/politics/201811081026775341/

     始自 13:10