海闊天空博客|海闊天空視頻 | 2025年3月26日

請點擊鏈接，觀看本期節目：

川普內閣再出爆炸性醜聞：最高軍事機密全程直播給資深記者

川普2.0兩個月以來，幾乎每天都有爆炸性新聞，今天新聞可以說是巨型炸彈級別的爆炸性新聞，一位資深記者被邀請加入川普內閣最高級別的國家安全軍事討論，該記者全程見證對也門胡迪恐怖組織實現軍事打擊的討論。我們首先簡要介紹一下泄密經過，然後整理分析一些要點，例如，如此泄密的嚴重危害性，涉及的川普內閣違反了哪些法律條例？現在的美國就是由這樣一群人掌控，各位朋友，你們有何感想？

“群聊泄密門”醜聞被曝光之後，川普，萬斯，黑格賽斯，沃爾茲等人不僅拒絕承認錯誤和承擔責任，而且說群聊內容不屬於機密信息，甚至還對記者進行人身攻擊。福克斯電視的口舌們也以各種方式為之洗地。以下是《大西洋月刊》公布的主要群聊內容，讓美國公眾看到事實真相。

2025/03/13

Michael Waltz

Team – establishing a principles group for coordination on Houthis, particularly for over the next 72 hours. My deputy Alex Wong is pulling together a tiger team at deputies/agency Chief of Staff level following up from the meeting in the Sit Room this morning for action items and will be sending that out later this evening.

Pls provide the best staff POC from your team for us to coordinate with over the next couple days and over the weekend. Thx.

4:28 p.m.

2025/03/14

Michael Waltz

Team, you should have a statement of conclusions with taskings per the Presidents guidance this morning in your high side inboxes.

State and DOD, we developed suggested notification lists for regional Allies and partners.

Joint Staff is sending this am a more specific sequence of events in the coming days and we will work w DOD to ensure COS, OVP and POTUS are briefed.

8:05 a.m.

JD Vance

Team, I am out for the day doing an economic event in Michigan. But I think we are making a mistake.

3 percent of US trade runs through the suez. 40 percent of European trade does. There is a real risk that the public doesn’t understand this or why it’s necessary. The strongest reason to do this is, as POTUS said, to send a message.

I am not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now. There’s a further risk that we see a moderate to severe spike in oil prices.

I am willing to support the consensus of the team and keep these concerns to myself. But there is a strong argument for delaying this a month, doing the messaging work on why this matters, seeing where the economy is, etc.

8:16 a.m.

Pete Hegseth

VP:

I understand your concerns – and fully support you raising w/ POTUS. Important considerations, most of which are tough to know how they play out (economy, Ukraine peace, Gaza, etc). I think messaging is going to be tough no matter what – nobody knows who the Houthis are – which is why we would need to stay focused on: 1) Biden failed & 2) Iran funded.

Waiting a few weeks or a month does not fundamentally change the calculus. 2 immediate risks on waiting: 1) this leaks, and we look indecisive; 2) Israel takes an action first – or Gaza cease fire falls apart – and we don’t get to start this on our own terms. We can manage both.

We are prepared to execute, and if I had final go or no go vote, I believe we should. This [is] not about the Houthis. I see it as two things: 1) Restoring Freedom of Navigation, a core national interest; and 2) Reestablish deterrence, which Biden cratered.

But, we can easily pause. And if we do, I will do all we can to enforce 100% OPSEC. I welcome other thoughts.

8:27 a.m.

Michael Waltz

As we stated in the in the first PC we have a fundamental decision of allowing the sea lanes to remain closed or to re-open them now or later, we are the only ones with the capability unfortunately.

From a messaging standpoint we absolutely ad this to of horribles on why the Europeans must invest in their defense.

8:42 a.m.

JD Vance

@Pete Hegseth if you think we should do it let’s go.

I just hate bailing Europe out again.

8:45 a.m.

Pete Hegseth

VP: I fully share your loathing of European free-loading. It’s PATHETIC.

But Mike is correct, we are the only ones on the planet (on our side of the ledger) who can do this. Nobody else even close. Question is timing. I feel like now is as good a time as any, given POTUS directive to reopen shipping lanes. I think we should go; but POTUS still retains 24 hours of decision space.

8:49 a.m.

2025/03/15

Pete Hegseth

TEAM UPDATE:

TIME NOW (1144et): Weather is FAVORABLE. Just CONFIRMED w/CENTCOM we are a GO for mission launch.

1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)

1345: “Trigger Based” F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME) – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)

1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package)

1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier “Trigger Based” targets)

1536: F-18 2nd Strike Starts – also, first sea-based Tomahawks launched.

MORE TO FOLLOW (per timeline)

We are currently clean on OPSEC.

Godspeed to our Warriors.

至此戈德伯格退出了聊天。他在《大西洋月刊》上寫道，在襲擊發生後，他確信聊天內容是真實的，於是退出了群聊。

歡迎大家評論、轉發和訂閱。下期節目見，謝謝！

已經刊登的節目：

2025-03-23馬斯克去國防部到底為什麼？傑佛遜為什麼說民眾安全在於新聞自由？

2025-03-17治理國家與管理企業是一回事嗎？商人治國有好結果嗎?

2025-03-15聯邦法院雙重否決川普馬斯克的政府裁員

2025-03-11全球股市大跌的原因到底是什麼？

2025-03-08驚天秘聞：川普到底是不是俄國的間諜 ？

2025-03-07白宮內閣會議馬斯克被內閣部長們圍攻

2025-03-05川普昨晚國會演講中不會告訴你的事實

2025-03-04倫敦峰會：世界各國為什麼堅決支持烏克蘭？

2025-03-03聯合國大會上川普為何與普京同流合污

2025-03-02川普萬斯對澤林斯基的鴻門宴

2025-02-24民主黨敗選深層原因

2025-02-23川普2.0第一個月民調究竟打幾分

2025-02-21川普2.0第一個月都幹了些什麼

2025-02-19民主黨2024年敗選的直接原因

2025-02-14敢於違抗川普聖旨的聯邦檢查官

新書推薦

《美國民主憲政的危機與希望: 從2024年大選透視兩黨區別和美國政治制度弊端》

亞馬遜紙質版Amazon Paperback $18.00

谷歌電子版Google EBook $16.00.