看到井蛙朋友坦然承認自己從基督教會轉到摩門教會聚會後，有很多網友本着愛真理和人靈魂的心與井蛙朋友對話。下面將這方面的對話收集在一起，但願對我們如何幫助有類似問題的人有益處。第一次嘗試整理網友討論，還不是很熟練，有不當的地方請指正。調整的地方是：將回答的人的標題移到內容的前面，這樣讀起來更順暢。另外，沒有完全按照時間順序整理，而是大概按照不同的話題整理。

-------------------------------------------


送交者: j9 2012月03月16日09:47:25 於 [彩虹之約]
回答:真的。一年多了，已經獲得了去聖殿的資格。上月底 由 井蛙 於2012-03-16 07:50:34

不知道是什麼引你入的摩門教。摩門最主要的問題
是不承認主耶穌是神。這是問題的核心。其他都是煙幕。不要再受騙了。

-------------------------------------------

送交者: Joshua 2012月03月16日10:10:43 於 [彩虹之約] 發送悄悄話
回答:引我入摩門教的是他們言行一致，嚴格遵守耶穌的教導，不虛偽。 由 井蛙 於2012-03-16 09:59:15

我相信你說的他們有“好行為”
但“好行為”“不虛偽”不能代你到永生。
他們的好行為比聖經里的法力賽人如何?
可見你是因“人”而信不是因為“真理”本身.

-------------------------------------------


送交者: Joshua 2012月03月16日10:03:01 於 [彩虹之約] 發送悄悄話
回答:這是徹底的謊言。耶穌是神！我們的救贖主。請不要再散布謠言了。 由 井蛙 於2012-03-16 09:54:13

check this:

JESUS

(christian)  Jesus was born of the virgin Mary (Isaiah 7:14; Matt. 1:23). (mormon)"The birth of the Saviour was as natural as are the births of our children; it was the result of natural action. He partook of flesh and blood - was begotten of his Father, as we were of our fathers," (Journal of Discourses, vol. 8, p. 115). "Christ was begotten by an Immortal Father in the same way that mortal men are begotten by mortal fathers" (Mormon Doctrine, by Bruce McConkie, p. 547). (Christian) Jesus is the eternal Son. He is second person of the Trinity. He has two natures. He is God in flesh and man (John 1:1, 14; Col. 2;9) and the creator of all things (Col. 1:15-17). (mornon) Jesus is the literal spirit-brother of Lucifer, a creation (Gospel Through the Ages, p. 15).

-------------------------------------------

送交者: 以西緬 2012月03月16日15:45:43 於 [彩虹之約]
回答:我挺想了解的，為啥同一本書分出這許多？！ 由 badguy 於2012-03-16 10:51:35

不是同一本書，摩門經是在聖經之外又加的一本書

-------------------------------------------

送交者: j9 2012月03月16日10:22:12 於 [彩虹之約]
回答:耶穌是上帝的兒子。 由 井蛙 於2012-03-16 10:08:04

看來你看到問題的關鍵了。耶穌到底是誰？
主耶穌是天父的兒子是什麼意思？這是表示他和天父的同等榮耀，同等權柄，同等聖潔公義，是自有永有的神。耶穌說： “我與父原為一”。你接受嗎？

-------------------------------------------

送交者: j9 2012月03月16日11:08:15 於 [彩虹之約]
回答:跟我們教會的教導沒什麼區別。去聖殿前被審查的問題 由 井蛙 於2012-03-16 10:44:44

問題在於你所理解和被教導的“神”和“救主”

和神和救主的真正意思不同。佛教也講行善，耶和華見證人也有救主，共產黨組織也很嚴密，猶太人之間也很互助，但真理只在聖經中。摩門教的人沒有說過 聖經是“corrupted",只有摩門經最正確嗎？沒有說過基督是某位天父的妻子和天父所生的嗎？那你信的大概不是摩門教。或者摩門教又有了新的啟示？

我貼兩個帖子，一個是關於摩門經的，一個是關於基督的：

http://www.equip.org/articles/is-the-book-of-mormon-credible-

http://www.jonahome.net/files/GODSWORD/shenxue/SYSTEMAT_ALL/V4_Christ.htm

願主耶穌得到你，奉主耶穌基督的名，阿門！

-------------------------------------------

送交者: j9 2012月03月16日11:26:21 於 [彩虹之約]
回答:問題在於你所理解和被教導的“神”和“救主” 由 j9 於2012-03-16 11:08:15

This article first appeared in the Ask Hank column of the Christian Research Journal, volume 28, number 3 (2005). For further information or to subscribe to the Christian Research Journal go to: http://www.equip.org

“I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel—which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned! As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be eternally condemned!” (Gal. 1:6–9 NIV).

In 1823, the angel Moroni allegedly visited Mormon prophet Joseph Smith and divulged the location of some golden plates containing the “fullness of the everlasting gospel.” These plates—abridged by Moroni and his father, Mormon, 1,400 years earlier—were written in “reformed Egyptian hieroglyphics.” Along with the plates, Smith found a pair of magical eyeglasses that he used to translate the cryptic writing into English. The result was a new revelation called the Book of Mormon and a new religion called Mormonism.

How millions can take the Book of Mormon seriously is almost beyond comprehension. First, while Smith referred to the Book of Mormon as “the most correct of any book on earth and the keystone of our religion,” its flaws run the gamut from the serious to the silly. In the category of serious, the Book of Mormon contains modalistic language that militates against the biblical doctrine of the Trinity (Ether 3:14). In the category of silly, a man struggles to catch his breath after having his head cut off (Ether 15:31).

Furthermore, while archeology is a powerful testimony to the accuracy of the Bible the same cannot be said for the Book of Mormon. Not only is there no archeological evidence for a language such as “reformed Egyptian hieroglyphics,” there is no archeological support for lands such as the “land of Moron” (Ether 7:6). Nor is there any archeological evidence to buttress the notion that the Jaredites, Nephites, and Lamanites migrated from Israel to the Americas. On the contrary, both archeology and anthropology demonstrate conclusively that the people and places chronicled in the Book of Mormon are little more than the product of a fertile imagination.

Finally, Joseph Smith asserted that the golden plates were translated “by the power of God” and produced “the most correct of any book on earth.” Joseph F. Smith, the sixth president of the Mormon Church, went so far as to say that the words were not only correct but “every letter was given to [Smith] by the gift and power of God.” In reality, however, the Book of Mormon has had to be corrected thousands of times to compensate for Smith’s poor grammar and spelling.

The Book of Mormon is fraught with other errors as well. For example, “Benjamin” was changed to “Mosiah” when Mormon leaders realized that in the chronology of the Book of Mormon King Benjamin had already died—thus he would have been hard pressed to “interpret” the engravings mentioned in Mosiah 21:28.

Perhaps the greatest crack in the credibility of the Book of Mormon is that whole sections were derived directly from the King James Version of the Bible—this despite the fact that according to Mormon chronology, the Book of Mormon predates the King James Version by more than a thousand years. Little wonder that Mormons accept the Book of Mormon based on a “burning in the bosom” rather than on history and evidence.

— Hank Hanegraaff

-------------------------------------------

送交者: 全伊 2012月03月16日08:41:58 於 [彩虹之約]
回答:你參觀的應該是visitor center。聖殿是不能參觀的 由 井蛙 於2012-03-16 08:38:28

為什麼？聖經說耶穌基督一次獻上，信徒人人皆
祭司，可以直接進入至聖所(有形的還是無形的)尋求神的面。你們摩門為什麼把神已經向信徒敞開的大門卻又關上呢？

-------------------------------------------

送交者: 以西緬 2012月03月16日21:44:13 於 [彩虹之約]
回答:真的。一年多了，已經獲得了去聖殿的資格。上月底 由 井蛙 於2012-03-16 07:50:34

關於到底什麼是聖殿，聖經清楚的教導是

每個信徒的身體是神的殿，信徒蒙聖靈引導同心聚集時聖靈又以這個由“活石”臨時構建的整體為神的殿，好似舊約的會幕，可拆可重新組建，全看代表“耶和華使 者”的雲柱、火柱的帶領 -- 雲柱、火柱一停就要搭建會幕；雲柱、火柱一要動就要拆開會幕，祭司們抬着分開的各個部分，跟從雲柱、火柱行走，其餘的百姓跟隨而行。

因着耶穌一次永遠在十字架上所獻的祭完全滿足父的要求，舊約會幕的預表在新約借着聖靈的內住得以在新約的時代實現。因此，任何人還是將物質的聖殿看作聖殿（無論建築多麼雄偉壯觀）就是開教會歷史的倒車。神允許物質的聖殿兩次被火焚燒就是對我們所有人的警戒。

所以陷在摩門教里的井蛙朋友，請你好好三思而行。降低主耶穌的身位，沒有聖靈內住的印記，一切的儀式都是空架子，都是人的假冒。因此，人宗教的靈是可怕 的，因為是與神的靈對抗的。當時反對耶穌的猶太教的最高領袖階層就是最好的例證。願我們今天不要重蹈覆轍，也不要跟着別人瞎跑。

-------------------------------------------

送交者: Joshua 2012月03月16日08:16:04 於 [彩虹之約] 發送悄悄話
回答: 由於

摩門教是標準的“粉飾的墳墓”不過無知的帥哥美女確實多。

摩門教創立與撒旦教共濟會有很大關係, 摩門教真正成功的是商業，副國銀行就是他們創立的

它們的LOGO是“HOLY BEE”

-------------------------------------------

送交者: Joshua 2012月03月16日08:49:04 於 [彩虹之約]
回答:我覺得你對摩門教及其教徒還是挺無知的。不想了解沒關係，但不要 由 井蛙 於2012-03-16 08:36:58

十幾年前同摩門長老辯論過聖經，與摩門教家庭同住過
多少了解一些,

剛入教的都是外圍，跟本不了解內幕的黑暗

-------------------------------------------

送交者: 以西緬 2012月03月16日16:05:22 於 [彩虹之約]
回答:耶穌教導人從行為分辨誰是他的跟隨者。 由 井蛙 於2012-03-16 10:32:48

當你知道... 兼談摩門教的問題

如果你知道，你我是從“叛逆的天使”來的，就知道到底是靠耶穌十字架的救贖行為得救，還是靠自己守律法和教義得救的區別在什麼地方了。

摩門教除了在聖經之外又增添了一本“經書”外，還有一下的問題：

（1）摩門教相信耶穌是受造的天使長成為人；

（2）摩門教相信三而一的神是“三位三體”

（3）摩門教相信女子必須與男子結婚才能得救（這是多妻問題的根源所在，雖然有些摩門教會不實行多妻，但並不意味着他們否認了那個背後的教義）-- 註：羅七認為這是非常邪惡的，也確實如此。

（4）與第三點相關聯的，摩門教將亞當、夏娃吃禁果理解成他們的同房，因此認為吃禁果是神的許可。

（5）摩門教不承認十字架的救贖工作，而認為那僅僅是榜樣 -- 純正的信仰既相信十字架的代贖大能，又堅信其榜樣的最高樣式。

還有一些，一般的摩門教徒並不十分清楚上面的意思，乃是叫他們注重其信徒的好行為。看人的外在行為而相信一個團體是危險的。