| The growth rates of GDP and dividends |
| 送交者: jingchen 2025年03月13日12:08:38 於 [股市財經] 發送悄悄話 |
|
The growth rates of GDP and dividends GDI is equal to GDP. For simplification, GDI has two components, wage and dividend. Assume dividend growth rate is constant. The stock market return would be d + g, where d is dividend yield and g is the growth rate of dividend. From 1928 to 2024, the average annual return of S&P 500 is 10%. The dividend yield has been declining over time. Since 1990, the average dividend yield has been below 2%. (From 1990 to 2024, the average annual return of S&P 500 is about 10.8%.) Suppose the average dividend yield is 2.5%, the average annual return of S&P 500 is 10%. This implies a growth rate of dividend of 7.5%. (In 1990, the total dividends paid by S&P 500 companies were approximately $60 billion. By 2022, this figure had grown to around $564 billion. The average annual rate of change in total dividend payouts for the S&P 500 from 1990 to 2022 is approximately 7.5%.) The average annual GDP growth rate in the U.S. since 1990, without adjusting for inflation, is approximately 4.5%. (about 5.5% since 1960) So the dividend growth rate is higher than GDP growth rate. The dividend portion of GDI is increasing over time. Hence the wage portion of GDI is declining over time. This also suggests that wage earners are increasingly less able to participate in the stock market boom. Stock market returns contain large chuck of speculative components. But over long period of time, its statistical impacts become less significant. Stock market only reflect the survivors. A book by Jeremy Siegel is titled The Future for Investors: Why the Tried and the True Triumph Over the Bold and the New. The title and content of the book shows that the Tried and the True Triumph Over the Bold and the New when we study the details of history. This suggests that survivor bias is less a concern, at least in the US market. The following is an example of HP, copied from copilot. While HP itself did not do well, some of its spin offs did better. Let's break down the stock market returns for HP, Agilent Technologies, and Keysight Technologies since their respective spin-offs: Agilent vs. HP (since 1999 spin-off)
Agilent vs. Keysight Technologies (since 2014 spin-off)
Both Agilent and Keysight have shown strong performance since their respective spin-offs, with Keysight experiencing particularly robust growth. Agilent has also outperformed HP since its spin-off in 1999. References 1. J.B. Maverick, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/042415/what-average-annual-return-sp-500.asp 2. Sean Ross https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/071616/history-sp-500-dividend-yield.asp
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
| 實用資訊 | |
|
|
| 一周點擊熱帖 | 更多>> |
| 一周回復熱帖 |
| 歷史上的今天:回復熱帖 |
| 2024: | 一周一圖看市場(Mar4-8):軟着陸在望 | |
| 2022: | 股市及美國新冠周死亡數3/11/2022 | |
| 2021: | 如何用JLTD分紅保險來使退休收入最大化 | |
| 2020: | 巴菲特談本次美股大跌和他經歷的幾次股 | |




