1. the HEs were looking for and interviewing people to adopt Anna Mei several
months BEFORE she was born; even after the HEs signed the document to transfer
Anna Mei's custody over to the Bakers, the HEs have brought at least two
other couples to see Anna Mei and see whether the couples were interested
in adopting the little girl. Mrs. HE also mentioned of giving Anna Mei to
her lawyer because they could not pay for the law suit fee.”

賀在小孩出生前就在尋找和面見一些願意收養賀梅的夫婦。
簽署了監護權轉移的文件之後，賀仍在繼續面見不同的夫婦，問他們是否有意收養賀梅。
賀並且提到將小女孩給他的律師，因為他們不可能付的起訴訟費用。

——看清楚了，純粹是在賣嬰。O。K。荒謬到極點了。官司打贏後，賀梅一樣是要被送給律師的，那為什麼還要打這場官司？很有可能賀後悔打官司，但是爛攤子鋪的開來收不回來，他最CARE的還是錢，還律師錢最重要，重要過自己的女兒。
這點是可以提供人證的。

2. the HEs asked Anna Mei to call the Bakers mommy and daddy, and addressed
themselves as Uncle Jack and Casey. Anna can talk at the time.”

這個證據不好找。

3. the Bakers had no intention of adopting Anna Mei from the beginning
at all. It is Mr. HE who suggested the Bakers to adopt Anna Mei.”

這個不好說。

“4. the HEs took advantage of the Bakers' care/love for Anna Mei. It seems
that the Bakers were at first not interested in adopting Anna. Mr. HE then
told Mr. Baker that Anna would be sent back to China where 50% of the baby
girls died. Mr. Baker cried, and agreed to take Anna Mei into his family.
”

我願意相信賀惡意誇大國內女性地位低下的狀況。他自己就是個不尊重女性的最恰當不過的例子，否則不會在結婚前還試圖以假文件把另一個女性辦出國，就不會和現任老婆一見面就讓對方懷孕，在老婆早產後一個月內再次讓老婆懷孕，並且把病弱的女兒交給別人寄養。

5. Mr. HE lied on quite some occasions, even under oath, for instance,
about his income to secure new car loan, about his marriage status. Many
things he told the media were also not true.”

撒謊就是撒謊，唯一可以原諒的撒謊是：不圖給自己添加利益，而是為他人的利益而撒謊的謊言。賀的謊言都是為了謀求自己的私利，所以沒有可以諒解的地方。

題外問題，為什麼不買舊車而要買新車？

6. the HEs said they could not care Anna Mei due to financial situations.
However, the court found that the HEs took many vocation trips during that
period, and bought unnecessary goods, e.g. new car and new computer (between
Anna Mei's 1 and 2 birthdays).”

經濟原因根本是藉口。他們不是窮，而是一個嬰兒的存在，防礙了賀的老婆出去打工掙錢的計劃。當然第二第三的孩子的出生，徹底使羅秦死了掙錢的心，因此回心轉意想要回女兒。