|
"... there are two ways to think about science. You can be a theist, believing that behind the veil of randomness lurks an active, loving, manipulative God, or you can be a materialist, for whom everything is matter and energy interacting within space and time. Whichever metaphysical club you belong to, the science comes out the same." (Source: Scientific American book review)
你的帖子涉及不同信仰的異同問題,不無一讀的價值.不過,最後這段英文引文(不管來自什麼地方), 顯得不倫不類,放在這裡,空洞無物,毫無意義.
本來我對你的話,頗有興趣,但是看到你狗尾續貂般地加了這麼一段毫無意義的“尾巴”,讓我大失所望, 如同穿着一件頗好的西裝,卻帶着一付袖套,如同廚房工作人員,這段英文就是你西裝上套一付袖套,儘管這付袖套是進口的,可是,你穿着西裝帶着袖套出席會議的,人家會把你當神經病的!
本來我要謝謝你的帖子,現在我要對你這個蠢人說,piss off!!!
|