我寫了篇論文，和傳統學術觀點不一致。投了很多雜誌，都拒絕安排審稿。為了找到突破口，我寫了篇短評（Comment)，和主流觀點進行正面交鋒。目的是指出傳統概念的錯誤，同時銷售自己的觀點。下面顯示的是稿件正在評審的過程。審稿人反應異常迅速。有誰有類似經歷，幫我分析一下，我稿件的命運。

JOURNAL: Physical Review Letters CURRENT STATUS OF MANUSCRIPT: With editors

CORRESPONDENCE: In the correspondence information for a Comment, "referee" may refer EITHER to the author of the paper which is the object of the Comment OR to an independent referee; the software which produces this report does not distinguish between these categories. Also, since Comments and Replies are inextricably intertwined, the status information here may not give a full picture. SENT RECEIVED DESCRIPTION 21Dec11 21Dec11 Review request to referee; report received 15Dec11 19Dec11 Review request to referee; report received 15Dec11 Communication (miscellaneous) received from author 14Dec11 Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author 13Dec11 14Dec11 Ed. decision and/or ref. comments to author; response rcvd 08Dec11 12Dec11 Review request to referee; report received 08Dec11 Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author 08Dec11 Right to publish signature received 08Dec11 Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author 08Dec11 Acknowledgment sent to author 07Dec11 Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author