http://hi.baidu.com/%B3%C2%B0%AC%B6%AB/blog/item/6526afc17d3cb8c6d000606f.html
2011年 Environmental Microbiology 雜誌刊登了一部分雜誌的審稿意見,讓您也見識一下什麼叫史上最牛的審稿意見:
1. This paper is desperate. Please reject it completely and then block the author’s email ID so they can’t use the online system in future.
2. The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave work and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about.
3. Reject – More holes than my grandad’s string vest!
4. The biggest problem with this manuscript, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style.
5. A weak paper, poor experimental design, comparison of sequences using different primers, no statistical analysis possible, carelessly written, poorly thought through.
譯文:
1.這文章太影響胃口了…請萬勿發表;此外,建議鎖定該作者的電子郵件ID,避免這個狗日的傢伙日後繼續投稿傷人。
2.寫作水平和展示的數據讓我感覺活着已經沒有意義,俺不得不提前下班,匆匆回家,然後花很多很多的時間重新找回當初堅定不移的人生意義。
3.拒發,必須的,本文的漏洞比我爺爺穿了五十多年的背心上的洞還多!
4. 這篇文章問題多多,寫作格式尤其要人老命,它讓我越看越想死,再看就生不如死。
5. 文章如狗屎,實驗設計像牛糞,使用不同的引物序列比較似驢的排泄物,統計分析恰似我今天早晨不小心踩到的人的便便;不置可否,看了您的文章我感覺自己掉進了黑洞洞的深不見底的大糞坑。