History of the paper |
Date: | Event: |
02 Apr 2012 | Manuscript received by Editorial Office |
02 Apr 2012 | Manuscript sent to Co-editor |
03 Apr 2012 | Manuscript sent to Referee1 |
03 Apr 2012 | Manuscript sent to Referee2 |
03 Apr 2012 | Manuscript sent to Referee3 |
03 Apr 2012 | Referee2 could not report |
03 Apr 2012 | Referee3 could not report |
03 Apr 2012 | Manuscript sent to Referee4 |
10 Apr 2012 | Reminded Referee1 |
10 Apr 2012 | Reminded Referee4 |
10 Apr 2012 | Referee4 promised a review |
17 Apr 2012 | 2nd reminder to Referee1 |
20 Apr 2012 | Reminded Referee4 who promised |
20 Apr 2012 | Referee4 promised a review |
23 Apr 2012 | Manuscript sent to Referee5 |
23 Apr 2012 | Referee5 could not report |
24 Apr 2012 | Reminded Referee4 who promised |
24 Apr 2012 | Manuscript sent to Referee6 |
25 Apr 2012 | Referee4 sent a report |
02 May 2012 | Reminded Referee6 |
09 May 2012 | 2nd reminder to Referee6 |
09 May 2012 | Referee6 promised a review |
11 May 2012 | Referee6 sent a report |
11 May 2012 | Message to author asking for revision |
21 May 2012 | The revised manuscript arrived to the Editorial Office |
21 May 2012 | Revised ms was sent to the Co-editor |
21 May 2012 | The revised manuscript was sent to Referee4 |
21 May 2012 | The revised manuscript was sent to Referee6 |
25 May 2012 | Referee4 sent a report |
25 May 2012 | Referee6 promised a review |
08 Jun 2012 | Reminded Referee6 who promised |
15 Jun 2012 | Reminded Referee6 who promised |
15 Jun 2012 | Referee6 promised a review |
21 Jun 2012 | Reminded Referee6 who promised |
21 Jun 2012 | Referee6 promised a review |
21 Jun 2012 | Referee6 sent a report |
21 Jun 2012 | Manuscript Accepted |
22 Jun 2012 | Copyright Form received |