設萬維讀者為首頁 廣告服務 技術服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
簡體 繁體 手機版
分類廣告
版主:諍友
萬維讀者網 > 教育學術 > 帖子
中國法律走向進步了嗎? 兼回 真是好玩 的324317帖.
送交者: ukp 2007年01月29日15:15:48 於 [教育學術] 發送悄悄話

First of all I am glad you are engaging in a civilized discussion. Let's follow this protocol.

Before I answer your questions, let me give you three examples:

(1) Bill Clinton was accused having a sexual relation with an intern. At the time, there was no direct evidence for this allegation. As we now know, the evidence is on Ms. Monica Lewinski's dress.

Nevertheless, the public outcry and the media pressure forced president Clinton to step up and make a statement. If you still remember, he made the famous sentence, " I did not have sexual relationship with Ms. Lewinsky."

The investigation started shortly after. Now we know all the results.

Bill Clinton or any of his supporters did not say "show your evidence if you are accusing the President." This, to Americans, is an insult!

(2) The Enron case also involved a whistleblower, Ms. Sherron Watkins. At the time, she had no direct evidence to against Enron. But the sheer scale and the extent of the internal corruption reported was enough to draw attention of any responsible people in the justice department.

What do those stories tell you? They tell you that "without evidence" is not a sole argument to hinder, stop and block legal and judicial investigation of the case! Of course they did not make Clinton and Enron guilty at the time.

(3) Scott Peaterson was accused murdering his wife. However, there was no physical evidence to hold him acountable. But now he is in prison, still without any direct evidence!

In cases like this, it is also time for the government to step in. Grand jury is one of the ways.

In China, I assume it is the government's responsibility to step in too. But do you think they will do it? Obviously China did not do anything. The burden is left for PKU! Ironically, PKU is not only a part of the government, but also the accused! It has the responsibility to answer to the tax payers and concerned citizens!

The result is that PKU chose to do whatever it wants to do. You call this "是中國法律走向進步的標誌"? If you are not joking, you must be very ignorant.

(I hope I answered your questions, unless you tell me that US justice system is worse than that of China.)

0%(0)
0%(0)
標 題 (必選項):
內 容 (選填項):
實用資訊
回國機票$360起 | 商務艙省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出爐:海航獲五星
海外華人福利!在線看陳建斌《三叉戟》熱血歸回 豪情築夢 高清免費看 無地區限制
一周點擊熱帖 更多>>
一周回復熱帖
歷史上的今天:回復熱帖
2006: 談談我對程序公正的看法
2006: 我所知道的丘小慶事件
2005: 中國在對韓問題上的失策
2004: “深海魚油”: 用英文欺負中國人,用
2004: 一個茶壺卅個杯:研究生擴招遭遇師生比
2002: 在伯明翰大學:中國學生重商輕理
2002: 領導幹部出國:點菜