我写了篇论文，和传统学术观点不一致。投了很多杂志，都拒绝安排审稿。为了找到突破口，我写了篇短评（Comment)，和主流观点进行正面交锋。目的是指出传统概念的错误，同时销售自己的观点。下面显示的是稿件正在评审的过程。审稿人反应异常迅速。有谁有类似经历，帮我分析一下，我稿件的命运。

JOURNAL: Physical Review Letters CURRENT STATUS OF MANUSCRIPT: With editors

CORRESPONDENCE: In the correspondence information for a Comment, "referee" may refer EITHER to the author of the paper which is the object of the Comment OR to an independent referee; the software which produces this report does not distinguish between these categories. Also, since Comments and Replies are inextricably intertwined, the status information here may not give a full picture. SENT RECEIVED DESCRIPTION 21Dec11 21Dec11 Review request to referee; report received 15Dec11 19Dec11 Review request to referee; report received 15Dec11 Communication (miscellaneous) received from author 14Dec11 Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author 13Dec11 14Dec11 Ed. decision and/or ref. comments to author; response rcvd 08Dec11 12Dec11 Review request to referee; report received 08Dec11 Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author 08Dec11 Right to publish signature received 08Dec11 Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author 08Dec11 Acknowledgment sent to author 07Dec11 Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author