http://hi.baidu.com/%B3%C2%B0%AC%B6%AB/blog/item/6526afc17d3cb8c6d000606f.html
2011年 Environmental Microbiology 杂志刊登了一部分杂志的审稿意见,让您也见识一下什么叫史上最牛的审稿意见:
1. This paper is desperate. Please reject it completely and then block the author’s email ID so they can’t use the online system in future.
2. The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave work and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about.
3. Reject – More holes than my grandad’s string vest!
4. The biggest problem with this manuscript, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style.
5. A weak paper, poor experimental design, comparison of sequences using different primers, no statistical analysis possible, carelessly written, poorly thought through.
译文:
1.这文章太影响胃口了…请万勿发表;此外,建议锁定该作者的电子邮件ID,避免这个狗日的家伙日后继续投稿伤人。
2.写作水平和展示的数据让我感觉活着已经没有意义,俺不得不提前下班,匆匆回家,然后花很多很多的时间重新找回当初坚定不移的人生意义。
3.拒发,必须的,本文的漏洞比我爷爷穿了五十多年的背心上的洞还多!
4. 这篇文章问题多多,写作格式尤其要人老命,它让我越看越想死,再看就生不如死。
5. 文章如狗屎,实验设计像牛粪,使用不同的引物序列比较似驴的排泄物,统计分析恰似我今天早晨不小心踩到的人的便便;不置可否,看了您的文章我感觉自己掉进了黑洞洞的深不见底的大粪坑。