基辛格對主席和周恩來的評價 |
送交者: Tse 2011年06月17日18:37:29 於 [史地人物] 發送悄悄話 |
基辛格對主席和周恩來的評價:
發信站: BBS 未名空間站 (Fri Jun 17 11:45:25 2011, 美東) 對太祖:He left behind a China unified as it had not been for centuries, with most vestiges of the original regime eliminated, clearing away the underbrush for reforms never intended by the Chairman. If China remains united and emerges as a twenty-first-century superpower, Mao may hold, for many Chinese, the same ambiguous yet respected role in Chinese history as Qin Shihuang, the Emperor he personally revered: the dynasty-founding autocrat who dragged China into the next era by conscripting its population for a massive national exertion, and whose excesses were later acknowledged by some as a necessary evil. 對周恩來:In some sixty years of public life, I have encountered no more compelling figure than Zhou Enlai. Short, elegant, with an expressive face framing luminous eyes, he dominated by exceptional intelligence and capacity to intuit the intangibles of the psychology of his opposite number. 對比:Mao dominated any gathering; Zhou suffused it. Mao’s passion strove to overwhelm opposition; Zhou’s intellect would seek to persuade or outmaneuver it. Mao was sardonic; Zhou penetrating. Mao thought of himself as a philosopher; Zhou saw his role as an administrator or a negotiator. Mao was eager to accelerate history; Zhou was content to exploit its currents. A saying he often repeated was “The helmsman must ride with the waves.” When they were together, there was no question of the hierarchy, not simply in the formal sense but in the deeper aspect of Zhou’s extraordinarily deferential conduct. |
|
|
|
實用資訊 | |
|
|
一周點擊熱帖 | 更多>> |
|
|
一周回復熱帖 |
|
|
歷史上的今天:回復熱帖 |
2010: | 震驚全國的“信陽事件”-查有實據的餓 | |
2010: | NoWorry: 誰百般推崇岳飛,誰是愚昧的 | |
2009: | 鄧穎超日記啟封:周恩來臨終懺悔 | |
2009: | 周恩來1975年重病期間給毛澤東的一封信 | |
2008: | 關於樓下撫後虐仇的說法,本匪說兩句。 | |
2008: | AlphaQ:一如既往,偽民族主義同學們都 | |
2006: | 大話晉國 - 三家分晉 (上) | |
2006: | 大話晉國 - 三家分晉 (下) | |