动态平衡与永恒斗争

---- Forwarded Message -----                 From:To:

Cc: t>Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:14:24 AM CDTSubject: "dynamic equilibrium" Re: Don't everybody forget about the word of "struggle"! Re: Socialist Market

动态平衡与永恒斗争

李良书简 09-26-2023

大家不要忘记“斗争”二字！

生存来自斗争；另请注意，在赫鲁晓夫和戈尔巴乔夫放弃斗争并接受“和平共处”的可能性之后，立马苏联解体了。

我们人类就是承受不起这种戈尔巴乔夫式的奢侈“共存”。任何一种共存，从人类学的角度来看，都隐含着对立双方的斗争，由此，共同生存才有可能。

自然的本质是各个方面的永恒斗争。在这个巨大的斗争过程中，存在着间歇性的平静和生存。这称为“动态平衡”；只有动态平衡才能稳定，静态平衡总是不稳定的。

我们中国人称之为“天道循环”、“天行健，自强不息”！

因此，共存来自斗争，而不是出于和平。

This is called a "dynamic equilibrium".     

Only a dynamic equilibrium can be stable, a static equilibrium is always unstable.    
We Chinese called that "天道循环“ and “天行健，自强不息”！   

 
（这称为“动态平衡”。  

只有动态平衡才能稳定，静态平衡总是不稳定的。 我们中国人称之为“天道循环”、“天行健，自强不息”！）

------ Original Message ------
Received: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:47:46 AM CDT
From:
To: B Cc: l

Don't everybody forget about the word of "struggle"!                

Survival  is from struggle; please also notice that after Khrushchev and  Gorbachev gave up struggles and adapt the possibility of "peaceful  coexistence", immediately the Soviet Union collapsed.                

We  human just can't afford of this Gorbachev kind of luxury  "co-existence", for co-existence of any-kind, from an anthropology stand  point, implicit struggles among opposite parties and from there, mutual survival can be possible.                
The  essence of nature is a forever struggle of perpetual characters in all  aspects, and within this gigantic process of struggle,  there are  intermittent peaces and survivals.      
               
  (大家不要忘记“斗争”二字！      

 生存来自斗争；另请注意，在赫鲁晓夫和戈尔巴乔夫放弃斗争并适应“和平共处”的可能性之后，立马苏联解体了。 我们人类就是承受不起这种戈尔巴乔夫式的奢侈“共存”，任何一种共存，从人类学的角度来看，都隐含着对立双方的斗争，由此，共同生存才有可能。 自然的本质是各个方面永恒的人物的永恒斗争，在这个巨大的斗争过程中，存在着间歇性的平静和生存。)

     
   
------ Original Message ------    
Received: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:49:26 AM CDT    
From: B   
To:    
Cc: l    
Subject: Socialist Market Economy  
   
   
            Yew,                    
                 To be able to conceptualize and practice seemingly  conflicting ideas is the height of wisdom and practicality.  It behooves  us to watch if China or any other nation achieves that.  (The US  certainly did not come close to adhering to the Republican slogan of  “Compassionate Conservatism.”)                            
                 Bob                  =========          
                       
                           On Sep 26, 2023, at 12:22 PM,> wrote:                              
                               only thing needs to be "either, or"                   is fengjian and licentism.                                      封建vs放肆                                                    
                                   On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 9:59 AM  wrote:                    
                                                        Indeed it is "either or"!                                     

Especially after capitalism turned into Imperialism as of now, this is fatalism.                                                                      
          
------ Original Message ------                      
Received: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:02:59 AM CDT                      
From: yew               To:                      
Subject: BO                      
                     
Hi Dr.Bob ,                                                As ex Chairman , do you still believe what you say to Edward Tse last time ?                                                          Do you still believe never  bet against China ? So China can still continued pursuit for prosperity  without being part of US dollar hegemony.          

 BOB CHING Chairman at                             
                                                         https://www.linkedin.com/in/bob-ching-257780116/     

   founding partner of Boston Consulting Group in China, told me in the early 1990s that “socialist market economy” – the term China had begun to use at that time – sounded like an oxymoron,  but was actually logical. I didn’t quite understand what he meant at  the time, but what he said stuck in my mind over the subsequent three  decades.                                    

My guess is that Bob meant the developed world believes  that concepts like socialism and capitalism, collectivism and  individualism, and ideology and pragmatism cannot coexist with each  other. For them, it is “either or”.    

China has grown on the back of its  belief that apparently opposing drivers are a fact of life, and that  developing approaches and systems to address these opposing drivers  effectively is the key to accelerated growth. The  Chinese started thinking of the world in terms of opposing forces at  work more than 2,500 years ago. They called this concept yin and yang,  and it still prevails today.”                                                   

Edward Tse is founder and CEO, Gao Feng Advisory Company, a strategy consulting and financial advisory firm, with roots in China                         

 Chinese modernisation may baffle the West, but it works                                                                  The ability to experiment, learn  and adapt, and to embrace seemingly opposing concepts simultaneously,  lies behind China’s rapid economic transformation                                                                  Xi Jinping’s resolve to achieve  both higher-efficiency growth and common prosperity, and to balance  manufacturing prowess with sustainable development, should be seen in  this light                          Chinese modernisation may baffle the West, but it works      
                                                                                       

转载