川普2020大選法庭訴訟盤點

截至到今日下午，川普陣營就2020大選發動的法庭訴訟狀況：

Pennsylvania

1。 敗訴 3rd U.S. Court of Appeals: In Bognet v. Boockvar, Republicans argued that the extended mail-in ballot deadline challenged the constitution.

Status: Denied.

聯邦第三巡迴上訴案。

共和黨指控州務卿延長通訊投票期限違憲，被第三巡迴否決。

2 不以審理 U.S. District Court, Eastern District: In Barnette v. Lawrence, the GOP lawsuit claimed that Montgomery County wrongly allowed mail-in voters the chance to cure ballots.

Status: Dismissed.

聯邦東區一審法庭案。

共和黨指控縣政府選舉機構錯誤地允許通訊投票選民有機會修正選票填寫錯誤，被法庭拒絕受理。

3。敗訴 U.S. District Court, Eastern District: In Trump v. Philadelphia County Board of Elections, the Trump campaign argued that there was insufficient access by observers.

Status: Denied. 

The Trump campaign later admitted that there were a "nonzero number of people in the room" observing the vote count, including some affiliated with the campaign. Judge Paul S. Diamond shot back, "I'm sorry, then what's your problem?"

聯邦東區一審法庭案。

川普律師先向法庭說計票觀察員沒有能夠有足夠的機會進行觀察計票過程，最後承認他們有人在計票站觀察計票過程。法官反問：“對不起，那你們還有什麼問題呢？”

4。 撤訴 U.S. District Court, Middle District: In Pirkle v. Wolf, four voter plaintiffs generalized allegations of fraud, based on complaints issued by third parties.

Status: Withdrawn.

聯邦中區一審法院案。

4個選民原告，依據第三者說辭，一般性指控大選有欺詐。

5。敗訴 Pennsylvania Supreme Court: In response to the Canvass of Absentee and Mail-in Ballots, Republicans claim that Philadelphia did not give election observers enough access.

Status: Denied. 

The court reversed the petition allowing an appeal. The court rejected the Trump campaign's claim that mail-in ballots with minor flaws must be rejected.

賓州最高法院案。

共和黨指控，賓州沒有給予投票觀察員足夠的機會觀察投票。

6。 敗訴 Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court: In Hamm v. Boockvar, Republicans claimed that the state wrongly allowed voters to cast provisional ballots to cure invalid mail ballots.

Status: Denied.

賓州上訴法院案。

共和黨指控賓州違規，允許臨時投票選民可以修正選票填寫錯誤。

7。撤訴 Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court: Northampton Republicans challenged notifications of votes that were canceled during prescreening.

Status: Withdrawn.

賓州上訴法院案。

共和黨人挑戰選舉機構通知選民選票在初檢階段作廢的做法。

8。勝訴 Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court: In Trump v. Boockvar, the campaign challenged the three-day deadline extension given to mail-in voters missing identification to supply proof of identification.

Status: Relief granted. 

The court found that the secretary of state had no authority to provide an extension. The secretary of state's office has said the total number of votes is probably fewer than 100 statewide.

賓州上訴法院案。

川普律師挑戰賓州延長通訊投票選民回到投票所驗證身份時間三天的規定。

涉及選票數量全州不到100州。

9。審理中  Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County: Both the Republican National Committee and the Trump campaign challenged over 2,000 mail-in ballots.

Status: Active. 

The Democratic National Committee and Bucks County seek an immediate review in Pennsylvania's Supreme Court of whether minor oversights can invalidate ballots.

賓州一審法庭案。

共和黨全國委員會和川普律師挑戰2000張通訊選票的合法性。

10。撤訴 Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas: In Trump v. Montgomery County Board of Elections, the Trump campaign and the RNC challenged about 600 mail-in ballots that lacked voters' addresses.

Status: Withdrawn.

賓州一審法院案

共和黨全國委員會和川普律師挑戰600張沒有地址的通訊選票合法性。

11。審理中 U.S. Supreme Court: In Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar, Republicans challenged the extended mail-in ballot deadline.

Status: Active.

聯邦最高法院案。

賓州共和黨挑戰賓州延長通訊投票選票收到截止日期的合法性。

12。 審理中。3rd Circuit Court of Appels: In Trump v. Boockvar, the campaign is arguing that different provisional ballot practices violate equal protection.

Status: Active.

聯邦第三巡迴案。

川普律師指控全州各縣不同的臨時投票處理方法違反了憲法平等保護原則。

13。 敗訴 A federal judge on Saturday dismissed the suit in a scathing opinion: "This claim, like Frankenstein's Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together," Judge Matthew Brann wrote.

賓州聯邦一審法院案。

川普律師要求法庭下令禁制11月23號的賓州大選認證

見博文鏈接周六賓州川普敗訴輸在哪裡？

14。敗訴 The Trump campaign appealed the ruling earlier this week, but their appeal was denied on Friday. The ruling states that "calling an election unfair does not make it so."

聯邦第三巡迴上訴法院案。

上面第13案的上訴案。

見博文鏈接川普的小桌子/聯邦第三巡迴/狀告選舉欺詐被告

15。審理中 Pennsylvania Supreme Court: The Trump campaign appealed a Philadelphia County Board of Elections decision to count five different categories of mail-in and absentee ballots.

Status: Active. 

The court is reviewing whether the state election code allows curing some mail-in ballots by casting provisional ballots.

賓州最高法院案。

川普律師對費城縣競選委員會允許5類通訊選票可以計票決定的上訴。

16。終止 Pennsylvania Supreme Court: In Ziccarelli v. Allegheny County Board of Elections, Nicole Ziccarelli, a GOP legislative candidate, challenged 2,349 undated mail-in ballots.

Status: Stayed. 

賓州最高法院案。

一賓州共和黨候選人挑戰2349張沒有填寫時間的通訊選票合法性。

17。審理中 Ziccarelli sought an injunction Monday to stop the certification of votes in Allegheny County.

賓州最高法院案。

第16案中原告請求法庭下令停止對Allegheny County的選舉認證。

18。待定 Court of Common Pleas for Westmoreland County: Ziccarelli is also challenging a small number of provisional ballots.

Status: Pending.

賓州一審法院案。

第16，第17案中的原告共和黨候選人挑戰數量微小的臨時投票的合法性。

19。 不以審理 Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court: In Kelly v. Pennsylvania, a group of Republicans, led by Rep. Mike Kelly, claimed that the state's no-excuse mail ballot law violates the state constitution. They sought an order blocking certification of most mail-in votes or that directs the state Assembly to choose the presidential electors.

The court on Wednesday issued a temporary blocking of any action to certify votes in Pennsylvania, “to the extent that there remains any further action to perfect the certification.” A hearing is set for Friday. 

The state has sought a supreme court review.

Status: Dismissal 

賓州一審法院案。賓州最高法院案。

共和黨指控賓州競選機構，允許沒有理由的通訊投票違反了賓州憲法，要求法院下令禁止賓州對選舉的認證。一審法官為此在周三下令賓州暫停還沒有完成的選舉認定。賓州司法部回答，認證已經完成。並將此案上訴到賓州最高法院。

賓州最高法院今天下午裁決，原告訴求不以審理。理由：關於通訊投票的規定1年多前就已經通過，那時原告為什麼不告？幾百萬通訊投票已經完成，此訴求提出太晚，所以不以審理。

Michigan

20。撤訴 U.S. District Court, Western District: In Johnson/Stoddard v. Benson, two Trump supporters made generalized allegations of voter fraud.

Status: Withdrawn.

聯邦西區一審法院案。

2個川普支持者一般性籠統指控有選民欺詐。

21。撤訴 U.S. District Court, Western District: In Trump v. Benson, the campaign claimed that Wayne County denied election challengers proper access to watch election workers handle ballots.

Status: Withdrawn.

聯邦西區一審法院案。

川普律師指控：選舉觀察員沒有能夠得到足夠機會觀察選票處理過程。

22。 敗訴Wayne County Circuit Court, Court of Appeals: In Constantino v. Detroit, two Republican poll challengers alleged irregularities in the vote.

Status: Denied. 

The plaintiffs have appealed to the state Supreme Court.

州上訴法院案。

兩個共和黨投票觀察員指控有違規投票情況。

23。 敗訴Wayne County Circuit Court: In Stoddard v. Detroit, the plaintiffs claimed that ballots were improperly duplicated by Democratic Party inspectors.

Status: Denied.

州一審法院案。

原告指控，選票有被違規的被民主黨監察員重複算的情況。

24。敗訴 Michigan Court of Claims: In Trump v. Benson, the campaign sought to have more poll observers watch the vote count.

Status: Denied. 

The plaintiffs appealed to the appellate court. Judge Cynthia D. Stephens said in her opinion that the case was "inadmissible hearsay within hearsay." "I heard someone else say something," Michigan Judge Cynthia Stephens said Thursday, summing up an affidavit submitted by the Trump campaign. "Tell me how that is not hearsay. Come on now!"

行政民事訴訟法庭案

川普律師訴求有更多的觀察員觀察計票情況，被一審駁回。案件到了州上訴法院，又被駁回。法官說：原告提出的理由全是傳聞加傳聞。

25。撤訴 U.S. District Court, Western District: In Bally v. Whitmer, a group of voters disputed election results in three counties based on allegations of voting irregularities and fraud.

Status: Withdrawn.

聯邦西區一審法院案。

一群選民以違規和欺詐為依據，挑戰三個縣的選舉結果。

26。提訴 U.S. District Court, Eastern District: In King v. Whitmer, a group of Michigan Republicans asked a federal judge to reverse Biden's victory in Michigan, an outcome that was formally certified earlier this week.

Status: Filed.

聯邦東區一審法院案。

一群密西根共和黨人要求聯邦法官否決拜登在密西根州的選舉勝利，而這個勝利本星期已經被密西根州認證。

Wisconsin

27。不以審理 U.S. District Court, Eastern District: In Langenhorst v. Pecore, Republicans made generalized allegations of voter fraud that relied on third-party accounts.

Status: Dismissed.

聯邦東區一審法院案。

共和黨人依據第三者敘述，一般性籠統指控密西根州選舉欺詐。

28。審理中 Wisconsin Supreme Court: In Wisconsin Voters Alliance v. Wisconsin Election Commission, a conservative group claims that the five cities of Kenosha, Green Bay, Madison, Milwaukee and Racine illegally accepted grants from Facebook CEO, Mark Zuckerburg to improve election systems. They also claim that officials failed to get voter identification for some mail-in ballots.

Status: Active.

州最高法院案。

威斯康星州一保守組織指控威州有6個城市，非法接受臉書老闆馬克 扎克伯格的贈款來改進選舉系統。

Arizona

29。不以審理 Maricopa County Superior Court: In Arizona Republican Party v. Fontes, the Republicans sought a hand recount of the ballots cast in Maricopa County by precinct. The GOP does not allege fraud, but it claims that the audit of votes did not meet state law.

Status: Dismissed.

縣高級法院案。

共和黨人訴求允許在縣裡分選區進行人工計票。

30。不以審理 Maricopa County Superior Court: In Trump v. Hobbs, the Trump campaign claimed that using Sharpies to fill in mail-in ballots caused an overvote and invalidated ballots.

Status: Dismissed.

縣高級法院案。

川普律師指控允許使用馬克筆導致一些選普作廢。

Nevada

31。審理中 Clark County District Court: In Election Integrity Project v. Nevada, the plaintiffs claimed that Nevada's vote-by-mail structure is unconstitutional. The suit was filed in September.

Status: Active.

縣一審法院案。

內華達一保守組織指控：州選舉通訊投票的系統違憲。

32。審理中 1st Judicial District Court, Carson City: In Law v. Whitmer, Trump's six electors claimed irregularities, including the improper use of scanning machines to verify signatures.

Status: Active.

州一審法院案。

6個投票選川普的選民指控選舉違規，包括不當使用掃描器來驗證簽名。

33。撤訴 U.S. District Court: In Stokke v. Cegavske, the plaintiffs sought to stop the use of automated signature matching in Clark County.

Status: Withdrawn.

聯邦一審法院案。

原告訴求停止使用簽名自動驗證機器。

34。不以審理 Nevada Supreme Court: In Kraus v. Cegavske, the Trump campaign, the Nevada GOP and a Republican voter and count-watcher named Fred Kraus sued to stop the use of automated signature matching.

Status: Dismissed. 

The parties reached an agreement to allow for more observers.

州最高法院案。

川普律師，內華州共和黨，和一個選民起訴要求停止使用簽名自動驗證機器。

雙方最後達成和解。

35。審理中 Clark County District Court: In Becker v. Gloria, April Becker, a state Senate candidate, challenged the use of automated systems to match mail-in ballot signatures and the mailing of ballots to all registered voters.

Status: Active.

縣一審法院案。

共和黨州參議員候選人挑戰使用自動簽字驗證機器來驗證通訊投票選票。

36。審理中 Clark County District Court: In Marchant v. Gloria, Jim Marchant, a congressional candidate, challenged the use of automated systems for signature-matching and for mailing ballots to all registered voters.

Status: Active.

縣一審法院案。

共和黨國會議員候選人挑戰使用自動簽字驗證機器驗證選票簽字。

37。審理中 Clark County District Court: In Rodimer v. Gloria, Daniel Rodimer, a state legislative candidate, challenged the use of automated systems for signature-matching and mailing ballots to all registered voters.

Status: Active.

縣一審法院案。

共和黨州立法機構候選人挑戰使用自動簽字驗證機器。

Georgia

38。不以審理 U.S. District Court, Northern District: In Wood v. Raffensperger, an Atlanta lawyer and Trump supporter sought an injunction to prevent a statewide canvass, arguing that a consent decree wrongly imposes an invalid procedure to verify voter signatures.

Status: Dismissed.

聯邦北區一審法院案。

一個亞特蘭大律師和一個川普支持者向法庭尋求禁止認證選舉結果的禁止令。

39。不以審理 U.S. District Court, Southern District: In Brooks v. Mahoney, four Republican voters claimed that a voting machine software glitch caused a miscounting of votes.

Status: Dismissed.

聯邦南區一審法院案。

4個共和黨選民指控選票機器軟體的一個設計錯誤導致計票錯誤

40。不以審理 Chatham County Superior Court: The Georgia Republican Party and the Trump campaign sought a reminder that mail-in ballots arriving late would not be counted.

Status: Dismissed.

縣高級法院案。

佐治亞共和黨和川普律師要求法庭下達一個提醒：過期收到的通訊投票不可以計票。

Minnesota

41。審理中 Minnesota Supreme Court: In Kistner v. Simon, several Republican candidates make generalized claims of voting irregularities. The lawsuit was filed on Wednesday and sought to block the state's certification of votes until an audit of the returns could be completed.

Status: Active.

州最高法院案。

幾個共和黨候選人一般性指控選舉違規，要求停止選舉認證直到選舉審計完成。

川普大選法庭訴訟基本狀況概括：

川普以及盟友們總共在7個州里的聯邦法院系統和州法院系統，就2020大選發起41個訴訟。

41個案子中，有26個結果為敗訴，撤訴，和不以審理，僅有賓州的一個勝訴（案#8），此勝訴案牽涉到的選票不到100張，而賓州拜登的領先票為8萬張。

41個案子中，還有14個案子處在審理，待定，提訴階段。

41個案子有19個在賓州發起，這與賓州的選舉人票在7個州中最多，高達20張有關。賓州的案#13，案#14，和案#19 意義重大，因為這幾個案子涉及選票上百萬張以上。

賓州案#13和案#14，是川普律師向聯邦法庭訴求下達命令禁止賓州11月23號的大選認證，這個訴求在 聯邦一審法院被否決後案#13，上訴到聯邦第三巡迴上訴法院案#14，在昨天又被第三巡迴上訴法院否決。

案#19 由共和黨國會眾議員凱利領軍，在賓州法院發動起訴，也是訴求法院下達禁止令停止賓州的大選認證。賓州一審法院上周三下達了禁止令，但這個禁止令只涉及到還沒有完成的認證，而賓州司法部的回答是認證全部已經完成，賓州司法部為此將案子上訴到賓州最高法院，賓州最高法院今天下午裁決：原告訴求法院下令停止認證的請求不以審理。

相關鏈接：

川普2020大選法律訴訟簡介