Total Depravity

Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones was hesitant about preaching on Sundays such doctrines as the five points of Calvinism. He was a Calvinistic Methodist and unashamed of that, but his approach was to permeate all his sermons with these truths and so to Calvinize people by showing them the greatness of our Sovereign Lord and his free redemption. However, when Dr. Lloyd-Jones took part in conferences and discussions he used theological and Calvinistic terms, but rarely did he do so when he preached on Sundays. People learning about Christianity must start in the infants’ school of trust in Jesus Christ before getting to the grammar school of election and the design of the atonement. I appreciate that wise response and have tended to take the same approach myself, but I also think times come when these truths, which are so preachable, need to be declared clearly. I do believe all five points and I want every Christian to believe them because they are the teaching of the Bible. They are historic Christianity. Charles Haddon Spurgeon was different from Dr. Lloyd-Jones as he asked his invited preachers to speak on the Five Points at the grand opening of the Metropolitan Tabernacle, one point each evening for a week. London needed to hear the Five Points as it does today.

—Geoffrey Thomas

The Reformation’s emphasis on sovereign grace met a great deal of resistance, not only from the Jesuits in the Roman Catholic Counter-Reformation, which was initiated especially to roll back the tide of the Reformation, but also, as we have seen, from James Arminius and his followers. The Arminians (or Remonstrants) presented five theological challenges to the Reformed faith, stating their belief in:

• Conditional election. Election, they said, is based on foreseen faith, meaning that God saw ahead of time which sinners would believe in His Son and elected them on that basis. Strictly speaking, election is neither sovereign nor unmerited.

• Universal atonement. Christ’s merits are universal—that is, Christ earned salvation for everyone equally—but only believers obtain its efficacy. The atoning work of Christ makes it possible for everyone to be saved, though it does not actually secure the salvation of anyone.

• Partial depravity. Man is seriously but not totally depraved; with God’s enabling grace, he has the free will and ability to choose salvation in Christ. Everyone chooses to either cooperate or not cooperate with the gospel call to faith and repentance. Sinners are born again by the Spirit only when they believe of their own choice.

• Resistible grace. Man can resist God’s internal, gracious call to salvation; thus, the Spirit’s work is defined and controlled by the sinner’s willingness to cooperate. God’s grace is vincible.

• Lapsing from grace. Arminius and the early Arminians were unsure whether a believer could lapse from grace, but by the time the Synod of Dort met (1618), the Arminians had rejected the doctrine of the perseverance of the saints. They said that unless a believer continues in the faith, he will not ultimately be saved.

The delegates at the Synod of Dort recognized that Arminian teaching threatened two major gospel themes: the glory that belongs to God alone in saving sinners and the believer’s security and assurance in God’s invincible grace. The rejection of these two themes implies the repudiation of salvation by sovereign grace alone. The synod responded to these challenges both negatively and positively in the Canons of Dort. Negatively, the delegates rebutted Arminianism in its every nuance in their rejections; positively, they expounded the main Calvinistic doctrines of salvation in a constructive way, presenting the marrow of what is called soteriological Calvinism. The word soteriological derives from soteria, the Greek word for “salvation”; soteriological, then, simply implies that which pertains to the truth or doctrine of salvation. Central to that salvation, according to the Canons of Dort, is God’s sovereign grace in saving sinners. Simply stated, the canons offer:

多特会议的代表们认识到，阿民念主义的教义威胁到了两个主要的福音主题：在拯救罪人方面荣耀唯独归于神，以及信徒在神不可战胜的恩典中的安全感和保证。拒绝这两个主题意味着拒绝唯独靠主权恩典得救。主教会议在《多特信经》中对这些挑战做出了积极和消极的回应。消极的是，代表们反驳了阿民念主义的每一个细微差别。积极的方面，他们以建设性的方式阐述了加尔文主义的主要救恩教义，呈现了所谓救恩论加尔文主义的精髓。 “soteriological”这个词源自希腊语“soteria”，意思是“救赎”。那么，救恩论仅仅意味着与救赎的真理或教义有关的内容。根据多特信条，救赎的核心是神拯救罪人的主权恩典。简而言之，信经提供：

• Sovereign grace conceived (unconditional election)

• Sovereign grace merited (particular redemption)

• Sovereign grace needed (total depravity)

• Sovereign grace applied (irresistible grace)

• Sovereign grace preserved (perseverance of the saints).

These five points are integrally linked; they stand or fall together. They are all rooted in two inescapable truths of Scripture: man’s complete ruin by sin and God’s perfect, sovereign, and gracious remedy in Christ. These parts of salvation fit together to provide us with a biblical, consistent view of grace revealing how God saves sinners to His glory. They show how great God’s grace is, how it directs everything in this world, and how salvation is ultimately not dependent on anything that man can offer. The real heart of Calvinism is that God sovereignly and graciously loves sinners fully and unconditionally in Christ.

It is important to note that the five points do not summarize all of Calvinism; that would be a truncated view of the Reformed faith. One of the aims of this book is to show the panoramic grandeur of the Reformed faith’s worldview. The Reformed confessions, as well as numerous books, such as Abraham Kuyper’s Lectures on Calvinism, H. Henry Meeter’s The Basic Ideas of Calvinism, Leonard Coppes’ Are Five Points Enough? The Ten Points of Calvinism, and Ernest C. Reisinger and D. Matthew Allen’s Beyond Five Points, show us that Calvinism is too broad and grand to be encompassed in five doctrines. Richard Muller says the five points are “elements that can only be understood in the context of a larger body of teaching,” which includes the necessity of justification by gracious faith alone, thankful obedience, the sacraments as means of grace, and many more. Muller concludes: “When that larger number of points taught by the Reformed confessions is not respected, the famous five are jeopardized, indeed, dissolved—and the ongoing spiritual health of the church is placed at risk.”

However, these points do summarize Calvinistic soteriology, which is one of Calvinism’s most important theological contributions. The Calvinistic plan of salvation is best defended in some of its most controversial areas by these five points.

The five points are conveniently memorized through the acronym TULIP, which, since the late nineteenth century, has been a common way of summarizing and teaching Reformed soteriology. But the acronym has weak points: it rearranges the order of the Canons of Dort and simplifies them. The canons say a great deal more than is represented by TULIP, and they say it with more vitality and in a better order. Nevertheless, TULIP can be used with profit, provided each point is explained with sufficient nuances, so I will follow its order as I examine the five points.

Some people have attempted to modify the terminology of Calvinism’s five points. They prefer radical depravity, radical corruption, or pervasive evil, which suggests that evil is at the root of things, to total depravity, which they assume to mean that every man is as evil as he can be, with no good at all. They prefer using the term sovereign election rather than unconditional election because the first term indicates that God’s gracious choosing makes man willing to receive salvation in Christ, whereas unconditional election seems to downplay the necessity of repentance and faith. Instead of limited atonement, which they say implies that God’s love and power are limited, they suggest definite atonement or particular redemption, which stresses that Christ’s death was for particular individuals. They prefer efficacious or effectual grace rather than irresistible grace, which they say conflicts with the human tendency to resist the common work of the Spirit. And they choose to stress the perseverance of God or the preservation of the saints, which gets at the source of perseverance, rather than the perseverance of the saints.

While such revisions, technically speaking, are consistent with Scripture, none is essential. Personally, if I had to change the wording of any part of TULIP, I would choose only to use definite atonement over limited atonement to avoid misunderstanding. Nevertheless, when rightly explained, TULIP ably sets forth Calvinist soteriology and defends it against its critics and against Arminian theology. Critics often say that TULIP represents a harsh or cruel form of theology, but Calvinism is actually the most loving theology possible, for it is a theology of grace.

This chapter briefly explains total depravity, the first of the five points of Calvinism. The next five chapters will expound the remaining points: unconditional election, limited atonement (two chapters), irresistible grace, and perseverance of the saints.

The Bible tells us that although fallen man is capable of doing some externally good acts, he cannot do anything truly good or pleasing in God’s sight (Rom. 8:8) unless he is regenerated by the Holy Spirit (John 3:1–8). From God’s standpoint, which is the only true standpoint, natural man is incapable of goodness in thought, word, or deed, and thus cannot contribute anything to his salvation. He is in total rebellion against God.

When Calvinists speak of total depravity, they are confessing our hell-deserving demerit and corruption before God because of our original and actual sins. We can neither erase our demerit nor do anything to merit the saving favor of God. To grasp the full implications of this truth, we must understand five things that lie at the heart of what Scripture presents total depravity to mean.^[1]

^[1] Joel R. Beeke, Living for God’s Glory: An Introduction to Calvinism (Lake Mary, FL: Reformation Trust Publishing, 2008), 48–52.