設萬維讀者為首頁 廣告服務 技術服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
簡體 繁體 手機版
分類廣告
版主:諍友
萬維讀者網 > 教育學術 > 跟帖
You can criticize him
送交者: c_y_lo 2014月06月28日00:27:42 於 [教育學術] 發送悄悄話
回  答: Gerard 't Hooft 最近回信不讓俺重投xyz12345 於 2014-06-26 15:50:34
I criticize his Nobel Lecture as follows:


       Nevertheless,
't Hooft also claimed in his Nobel Lecture [41] that the electric energy is
part of the physical mass mphys of an electron. Moreover, he claimed this "physical mass" obeys
Newton's second law F = mphys a. Note that such a claim violates
special relativity because part of the electric energy is far from the electron
and thus cannot react immediately as an inertial mass does. Another Nobel
Laureate Wilczek [42] also incorrectly applied m = E/c2 without
providing a justification. His problem is that he cannot be distinct about the
issue that a type of energy is equivalent to mass is different from that the
mass is equivalent to energy.



0%(0)
0%(0)
標  題 (必選項):
內  容 (選填項):
實用資訊
回國機票$360起 | 商務艙省$200 | 全球最佳航空公司出爐:海航獲五星
海外華人福利!在線看陳建斌《三叉戟》熱血歸回 豪情築夢 高清免費看 無地區限制
一周點擊熱帖 更多>>
一周回復熱帖
歷史上的今天:回復熱帖
2013: part 20 Freedom VS. Fit 自由VS.適應
2013: 家長怎樣幫助孩子處理和學校的矛盾?
2012: 我的預見力還是相當強的。我早說了,龍
2012: On weight reduction of metals
2011: 從電影“辛德勒的名單”談“中國知識分
2011: 羽矢是老 Tse 叫獸?
2010: 是什麼力量能讓美國科學院院士忘了小學
2010: 美國人怎樣罵人?
2009: 邏輯同學很有意思啊,言同學那麼大的漏
2009: 逮捕劉小波對中共意味着什麼?