主流質疑相對論“學名”叫 “Lorentz Violation”，不叫 "反相對論“。"反相對論“ 在中國大陸被認為 ”民科“。



Eur. Phys. J. C (2010) 69: 343–346

DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1437-9





Lorentz violation in high-energy ions

Santosh Devasiaa

U. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-2600, USA



Abstract The theoretical interest in small Lorentz violations has motivated experiments that investigate it by measuring deviations in the time dilation predicted by special relativity (SR) using high-energy ions. The main contribution of this article is to show that including the Doppler effect in the emission (which is of the same order as the time dilation effect) in the analysis leads to differences between experimental and theoretical predictions that indicate potential Lorentz violation.



以上論文認為高能離子實驗測得到時間膨脹因子和狹義相對論的預言有偏離。但是原實驗作者不同意，說以上作者誤解了他們的實驗：



Eur. Phys. J. C (2011) 71: 1596

DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1596-3



Comment on: “Lorentz violation in high-energy ions”

by Santosh Devasia



Abstract In an article “Lorentz violation in high-energy ions” by S. Devasia published in this Journal [EPJ C 69,

343 (2010)], our recent Doppler shift experiments on fast ion beams are reanalyzed. Contrary to our analysis, Devasia concludes that our results provide an “indication of Lorentz violation”. We argue that this conclusion is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of our experimental scheme and reiterate that our results are in excellent agreement with Special Relativity.