主流质疑相对论“学名”叫 “Lorentz Violation”，不叫 "反相对论“。"反相对论“ 在中国大陆被认为 ”民科“。



Eur. Phys. J. C (2010) 69: 343–346

DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1437-9





Lorentz violation in high-energy ions

Santosh Devasiaa

U. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-2600, USA



Abstract The theoretical interest in small Lorentz violations has motivated experiments that investigate it by measuring deviations in the time dilation predicted by special relativity (SR) using high-energy ions. The main contribution of this article is to show that including the Doppler effect in the emission (which is of the same order as the time dilation effect) in the analysis leads to differences between experimental and theoretical predictions that indicate potential Lorentz violation.



以上论文认为高能离子实验测得到时间膨胀因子和狭义相对论的预言有偏离。但是原实验作者不同意，说以上作者误解了他们的实验：



Eur. Phys. J. C (2011) 71: 1596

DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1596-3



Comment on: “Lorentz violation in high-energy ions”

by Santosh Devasia



Abstract In an article “Lorentz violation in high-energy ions” by S. Devasia published in this Journal [EPJ C 69,

343 (2010)], our recent Doppler shift experiments on fast ion beams are reanalyzed. Contrary to our analysis, Devasia concludes that our results provide an “indication of Lorentz violation”. We argue that this conclusion is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of our experimental scheme and reiterate that our results are in excellent agreement with Special Relativity.